< Back to UCC Document Community

StarStrider

Maine UCC search showing confusing results - need help interpreting records

I'm trying to do a maine ucc search on a potential equipment purchase and getting results that don't make sense to me. The debtor name shows up with three different UCC-1 filings from 2019, 2021, and 2023, but two show 'TERMINATED' status and one shows 'ACTIVE.' The collateral descriptions are slightly different on each one - one says 'all equipment' and another says 'manufacturing equipment located at [address].' I need to know if there's still a valid lien on this equipment before we close. The seller claims everything was paid off but these search results are confusing me. Has anyone dealt with interpreting multiple UCC records for the same debtor? I'm worried about missing something important that could affect our purchase.

Ravi Gupta

•

Multiple UCC filings for the same debtor is pretty common, especially for businesses that have had different loans over time. The TERMINATED status usually means those liens were properly released when the loans were paid off. You'll want to focus on that ACTIVE filing from 2023 - that's likely your concern. Check if the collateral description covers the specific equipment you're buying.

0 coins

Exactly this. I see this all the time with equipment purchases. The terminated ones are old history, but you definitely need to investigate that active 2023 filing.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

Thanks, that makes sense. The active one does say 'manufacturing equipment' which could include what we're buying. Should I contact the secured party directly to ask about a partial release?

0 coins

Omar Hassan

•

Before you contact anyone, make sure you're reading the UCC search results correctly. Sometimes the online portals can be confusing about what's actually active vs terminated. Did you get the filing numbers for each record? You might want to pull the actual UCC-1 documents to see the exact collateral descriptions.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

I have the filing numbers but haven't pulled the full documents yet. The search just shows summary info. Good point about double-checking - I'll get the complete filings.

0 coins

Yeah, don't trust just the summary view. I've seen cases where the search results were misleading about termination status.

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

Had a similar situation last month with a maine ucc search. Turned out there were continuation filings I missed that kept an old lien active. Make sure you're looking at the complete filing history, not just the original UCC-1 filings. Any UCC-3 amendments or continuations can change the status.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

Oh wow, I didn't think about continuation filings. How do I find those in the search results?

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

They should show up in the same search if you search by debtor name. Look for UCC-3 filings with the same filing number as the base UCC-1.

0 coins

CosmicCruiser

•

This is why I always do a comprehensive document review before any equipment purchase. Missing a continuation or amendment can be costly.

0 coins

I actually found a tool that helps with this exact problem - Certana.ai has a UCC document verification system where you can upload all the UCC documents and it cross-checks everything for consistency. I used it when I was confused about multiple filings on a real estate deal. You just upload the PDFs and it shows you if there are any discrepancies or missing pieces in the filing chain.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

That sounds really helpful. Does it work with Maine UCC documents specifically?

0 coins

Yes, it works with any state's UCC filings. Really saved me from missing a critical amendment that would have voided our security interest.

0 coins

Sean Doyle

•

Be careful about assuming terminated means clear. I've seen cases where a UCC-3 termination was filed incorrectly and the lien was still technically valid. Also, check if the equipment has any serial numbers that match specific collateral descriptions in the active filing.

0 coins

Zara Rashid

•

This is a good point. Serial number matching is crucial for equipment liens.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

The equipment does have serial numbers. I should definitely check if those are specifically listed in any of the UCC filings.

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

If the active UCC-1 has specific serial numbers listed, that's your smoking gun right there.

0 coins

Nia Jackson

•

Why is the maine ucc search system so confusing anyway? Other states have much cleaner interfaces that make this stuff obvious.

0 coins

NebulaNova

•

Tell me about it. Every state has their own quirky system. At least Maine's is online - some states still require paper requests.

0 coins

The interface isn't great but the data is usually accurate if you know how to read it properly.

0 coins

Aisha Khan

•

Don't forget to check the filing dates against the equipment purchase date from the seller. If the seller bought the equipment after the UCC-1 was filed, it might not even be covered by the lien.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

That's a great point I hadn't considered. The equipment was purchased in 2022 and the active UCC-1 is from 2023, so it could be covered.

0 coins

Ethan Taylor

•

Timeline analysis is always important in UCC due diligence.

0 coins

Yuki Ito

•

You might also want to search variations of the debtor name. Sometimes filings use slightly different versions (LLC vs L.L.C., Inc vs Incorporated) and you could miss active liens.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

Good call. I only searched the exact name the seller gave me. I should try variations.

0 coins

Carmen Lopez

•

Name variations are a huge trap in UCC searches. Always search multiple formats.

0 coins

This is where automated tools like Certana.ai really help - they can catch name variations and cross-reference everything automatically.

0 coins

Andre Dupont

•

I dealt with a similar maine ucc search issue last year. Ended up having to get title insurance because we couldn't definitively clear all the liens. Sometimes that's the safest route for expensive equipment.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

Title insurance for equipment - I didn't know that was an option. What does that typically cost?

0 coins

Andre Dupont

•

Depends on the equipment value, but it was worth it for peace of mind on a six-figure purchase.

0 coins

Update us when you figure this out! I'm dealing with a similar situation in New Hampshire and curious how it resolves.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

Will do! I'm going to pull all the complete UCC documents first, then probably use that Certana verification tool to make sure I'm not missing anything.

0 coins

Jamal Wilson

•

Smart approach. Better to be thorough upfront than deal with lien issues later.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today