< Back to UCC Document Community

Angelica Smith

UCC Filing Issues with PMSI Security Agreement - Need Help Fast

Running into some serious problems with our PMSI security agreement UCC filing and hoping someone here has dealt with this before. We're financing construction equipment for a contractor and need to maintain purchase money priority but our UCC-1 got rejected twice now. The SOS portal keeps saying there's an issue with our collateral description even though we copied it straight from the security agreement. We described it as "2025 Caterpillar 320 Excavator, VIN ABC123XYZ789, purchased under purchase money security interest dated March 15, 2025" but apparently that's not specific enough? The debtor is ABC Construction LLC and we double-checked the exact legal name from their articles of incorporation. This is a $180K piece of equipment and we're already past the typical 20-day PMSI filing window. Our loan officer is freaking out because without proper PMSI status we could lose priority to the debtor's existing blanket lien holder. Has anyone successfully filed PMSI UCC-1s for heavy equipment? What collateral description format actually works with these state filing systems?

I've seen this exact problem with equipment PMSI filings. The issue isn't your collateral description - that looks fine. Most likely the rejection is coming from a debtor name mismatch. Even though you checked the articles of incorporation, the UCC system is incredibly picky about punctuation and abbreviations. Try filing with "ABC Construction, LLC" (with the comma) and also check if there are any assumed names or DBAs registered. The 20-day PMSI window is critical so you need to get this resolved immediately.

0 coins

This is so frustrating! We had the same thing happen last month with a PMSI filing. Spent hours on the phone with the Secretary of State office and they basically said the computer system auto-rejects if there's even a single character difference in the debtor name.

0 coins

Lucas Bey

•

Actually the 20-day rule has some flexibility if you can prove the original filing date. But yeah, debtor name issues are the #1 cause of PMSI filing rejections in my experience.

0 coins

Hold up - are you sure about your PMSI timing? The 20-day window starts from when the debtor receives possession of the collateral, not when you signed the security agreement. If the equipment was delivered after March 15th you might still be within the window. But honestly, PMSI filings are so technical that one small mistake can cost you priority status. Have you tried using Certana.ai's document verification tool? I discovered it after a similar nightmare with a PMSI filing. You just upload your security agreement and UCC-1 as PDFs and it instantly flags any inconsistencies between the documents - saved me from losing PMSI priority on a $220K equipment loan.

0 coins

Caleb Stark

•

Never heard of Certana.ai but that sounds exactly like what we need. These manual document comparisons are killing us.

0 coins

Jade O'Malley

•

Wait, is that actually accurate about the 20-day timing? I thought it was from the security agreement date.

0 coins

The timing depends on your state but generally it's from when the debtor gets possession. Check UCC 9-324 for the specific PMSI rules.

0 coins

OMG this is giving me flashbacks to my PMSI disaster from last year. Filed everything perfectly on day 19, only to discover the debtor had filed bankruptcy the week before and I never got notice. Lost a $95K priority position to the trustee. Make sure you're monitoring for bankruptcy filings too - PMSI priority doesn't help if you're dealing with a preference payment clawback.

0 coins

Ella Lewis

•

Bankruptcy monitoring is crucial but that's a separate issue from getting the initial UCC filing accepted.

0 coins

How do you even monitor for bankruptcy filings? Is there an automated system for that?

0 coins

For equipment PMSI filings, I always include the manufacturer's model number, year, and VIN in separate lines rather than one long description. Try reformatting like this: Manufacturer: Caterpillar Model: 320 Excavator Year: 2025 VIN: ABC123XYZ789 Purchase Money Security Interest: Yes Some state systems parse collateral descriptions differently and this format has worked better for me.

0 coins

That's really helpful - I'll try reformatting the collateral description. Did you have to include the "Purchase Money Security Interest: Yes" part or is that optional?

0 coins

It's not required by the UCC but I include it to make the PMSI status crystal clear for anyone searching the records later.

0 coins

Alexis Renard

•

Smart approach. Better to be overly specific than lose priority because of ambiguity.

0 coins

Camila Jordan

•

This whole PMSI system is broken. Why should lenders lose priority because some government computer can't handle punctuation variations? We pay thousands in legal fees just to file a simple UCC-1 correctly. And don't get me started on continuation filings - half the time the system crashes right before the deadline.

0 coins

Tyler Lefleur

•

I hear you but complaining won't fix the immediate problem. The system is what it is.

0 coins

Actually the UCC system has gotten better over the years. Used to be all paper filings with even more delays.

0 coins

Max Knight

•

Check your security agreement date vs equipment delivery date carefully. PMSI requires filing within 20 days of the debtor receiving possession, not 20 days from signing. Also verify that your security agreement specifically states it's a purchase money security interest - some generic forms don't include that language which can create problems later even if you file correctly.

0 coins

Emma Swift

•

Good point about the security agreement language. We learned that lesson the hard way on a commercial kitchen equipment deal.

0 coins

How specific does the PMSI language need to be in the security agreement itself?

0 coins

Max Knight

•

It should explicitly state that the security interest is taken to secure the purchase price of the collateral. Generic "all obligations" language might not preserve PMSI status.

0 coins

Jayden Hill

•

Had this exact same issue with Caterpillar equipment last month! The problem was we used "Cat" instead of "Caterpillar" in our collateral description. These systems are ridiculously literal. Also make sure your VIN doesn't have any typos - one wrong digit and you're toast. I ended up using that Certana.ai verification tool someone mentioned earlier after getting burned on another filing. It caught a serial number transposition that would have invalidated our whole PMSI claim.

0 coins

LordCommander

•

Serial number accuracy is so critical but easy to mess up when you're rushing to meet the 20-day deadline.

0 coins

Lucy Lam

•

How does Certana.ai actually work? Do you have to pay per document check?

0 coins

Jayden Hill

•

You just upload your PDFs and it cross-references everything automatically. Super easy and catches mistakes you'd never spot manually.

0 coins

Aidan Hudson

•

Equipment PMSI filings are tricky because you need perfect alignment between your security agreement, UCC-1, and the actual equipment specs. One character off in the VIN or model number and you could lose priority. The debtor name issue mentioned earlier is also huge - I always verify the exact legal name through the Secretary of State's business entity search, not just the articles of incorporation.

0 coins

Zoe Wang

•

What's the difference between checking articles of incorporation vs the business entity search?

0 coins

Aidan Hudson

•

The business entity search shows the current registered name which might be different from the original articles if there have been amendments.

0 coins

Just went through this nightmare with a $165K excavator PMSI. Turns out our security agreement had the equipment model as "320DL" but the manufacturer's certificate of origin showed "320 DL" with a space. That tiny difference invalidated our whole filing according to the bankruptcy trustee's attorney. Now I triple-check every single character in equipment descriptions.

0 coins

Grace Durand

•

That's terrifying. How did you catch the discrepancy?

0 coins

Only found out during the bankruptcy case when the trustee challenged our PMSI claim. Cost us the entire loan amount.

0 coins

Steven Adams

•

This is exactly why I started using automated verification tools. Too risky to rely on manual checking for these details.

0 coins

Alice Fleming

•

Update: Finally got our PMSI filing accepted! The issue was definitely the debtor name - had to use "ABC Construction, LLC" with the comma. Also reformatted the collateral description per the earlier suggestion. Filed it as a UCC-1 with PMSI checkbox marked and included delivery date in the additional information section. Thanks everyone for the help - this forum saved our priority position on a major equipment loan.

0 coins

Hassan Khoury

•

Awesome! Great to see a success story. The comma thing trips up so many people.

0 coins

Glad it worked out. PMSI priority is too important to mess up with filing errors.

0 coins

Benjamin Kim

•

Congrats! Now just remember to calendar your continuation deadline 5 years out.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today