PMSI UCC-1 filing got rejected - debtor name issue blocking my equipment lien
Anyone else dealing with PMSI filing headaches? I'm trying to perfect a purchase money security interest on some manufacturing equipment we financed last month. Filed the UCC-1 within the 20-day window but it got rejected because of a debtor name mismatch. The equipment dealer used 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' on the invoice but the debtor's articles show 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' with a comma. Now I'm past my PMSI grace period and scrambling to figure out if I can still claim purchase money status. The loan was for $85K and I really need this PMSI priority over the blanket lien that was already filed. Has anyone successfully argued the relation-back doctrine in a situation like this? The rejection notice just says 'debtor name does not match' but doesn't specify what exactly is wrong. I'm worried I've lost my PMSI protection entirely.
33 comments
Join the conversation
Adrian Connor
Ouch, that comma issue is a classic problem. The exact name match requirement is brutal - I've seen deals fall apart over punctuation marks. For PMSI status, you generally need to file within 20 days of the debtor receiving possession, and if your filing was rejected during that window, you might still be able to argue you had constructive filing. But it's risky territory.
0 coins
Aisha Jackson
Wait, I thought the 20-day rule was just for inventory PMSI, not equipment. Equipment PMSI just needs to be filed before or within 20 days after debtor gets possession, right?
0 coins
Adrian Connor
You're thinking of inventory vs equipment rules. For equipment PMSI, you need to file before the debtor receives possession OR within 20 days after. The grace period applies to both, but inventory has additional notice requirements to other secured parties.
0 coins
Ryder Everingham
I had almost the exact same issue last year - rejection due to debtor name formatting. The key is whether your state follows the 'seriously misleading' standard or strict compliance. Most states use the seriously misleading test, so 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' vs 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' probably wouldn't be seriously misleading to a reasonable searcher. You might still have valid perfection.
0 coins
Mikayla Davison
AuthorThat's encouraging. Do you know how I can check which standard my state uses? The SOS website is pretty vague about the exact matching requirements.
0 coins
Ryder Everingham
Check your state's UCC Article 9 statutes, usually section 9-506. It should specify the 'seriously misleading' standard. Also, most states have safe harbor provisions for minor errors in debtor names.
0 coins
Lilly Curtis
Actually ran into this exact scenario a few months back. Ended up using Certana.ai's document checker - you can upload your articles of incorporation and UCC-1 side by side and it flags any name discrepancies before filing. Would have saved me the rejection and the panic attack.
0 coins
Leo Simmons
PMSI priority is tricky even with perfect filings. You mentioned there's already a blanket lien - when was that filed? If it was filed before your PMSI, you need to make sure your collateral description is specific enough to clearly identify the equipment as PMSI collateral. Generic descriptions like 'all equipment' won't cut it for PMSI claims.
0 coins
Mikayla Davison
AuthorThe blanket lien was filed about 6 months ago and covers 'all equipment, inventory, and accounts.' My PMSI filing specifically describes the manufacturing equipment by serial number and model. That should be sufficient for PMSI priority, right?
0 coins
Leo Simmons
Serial numbers and model descriptions are exactly what you want for PMSI collateral. That level of specificity should help establish your priority claim even if there are questions about the filing timing.
0 coins
Lindsey Fry
Don't panic yet! The rejection might actually work in your favor if you can refile quickly. Some courts have held that the 20-day PMSI window is measured from when the debtor receives possession, not from when you attempt to file. If you can cure the name issue and refile within a reasonable time, you might still maintain PMSI status.
0 coins
Saleem Vaziri
This is why I always double-check debtor names against the secretary of state database before filing anything. Takes 5 minutes and saves weeks of headaches.
0 coins
Kayla Morgan
Easier said than done when you're dealing with multiple entity variations. I've seen companies with 3-4 different name formats across their various documents.
0 coins
James Maki
Had a similar PMSI nightmare last year - rejected filing, missed deadlines, the whole mess. What saved me was proving the debtor name I used was substantially similar to the correct name. The court looked at whether a reasonable searcher would find my filing when searching under the correct name. A comma difference probably passes that test.
0 coins
Jasmine Hancock
What jurisdiction were you in? Some states are way more strict about exact name matches than others.
0 coins
James Maki
This was in Michigan. They follow the UCC's 'seriously misleading' standard pretty closely. The court basically said punctuation differences don't make a filing seriously misleading.
0 coins
Cole Roush
Michigan's actually pretty debtor-friendly on name matching. Other states might be less forgiving.
0 coins
Scarlett Forster
Check if your state allows amendment filings to relate back to the original filing date. Some states permit this for correcting debtor name errors, which could preserve your PMSI timing. File a UCC-3 amendment ASAP with the correct debtor name and note that it's correcting the original filing.
0 coins
Arnav Bengali
Amendment relation-back is state-specific and pretty technical. Definitely consult with a UCC attorney before relying on that strategy.
0 coins
Sayid Hassan
I've seen lenders try the amendment route and get burned when courts don't allow relation-back. It's a risky strategy without solid precedent in your jurisdiction.
0 coins
Rachel Tao
The PMSI rules are unforgiving but not impossible. Since you filed within the 20-day window, even with the rejection, you might have an argument for substantial compliance. The key is whether the name error makes your filing seriously misleading. A comma difference probably doesn't meet that threshold.
0 coins
Derek Olson
Substantial compliance is a great point. The UCC favors substance over form in most situations.
0 coins
Danielle Mays
I'd still refile immediately with the correct name. Better to have a valid filing than to argue about substantial compliance in court later.
0 coins
Roger Romero
This is exactly why I started using Certana.ai for all my UCC filings. You upload your corporate documents and UCC forms, and it instantly flags any name discrepancies before you file. Catches stuff like comma placement, LLC vs L.L.C., Inc vs Incorporated. Would have caught your issue before the rejection.
0 coins
Anna Kerber
How accurate is the name checking? I've tried other services that missed obvious discrepancies.
0 coins
Roger Romero
It's pretty thorough - cross-references the exact name format from articles of incorporation against your UCC forms. Saved me from at least 3 rejections this year.
0 coins
Niko Ramsey
File the corrected UCC-1 immediately while you figure out the PMSI timing issue. Even if you lose PMSI priority, you still want to perfect your security interest. A perfected non-PMSI lien is better than an unperfected PMSI claim.
0 coins
Seraphina Delan
Absolutely this. Get the corrected filing done today if possible. Priority disputes can be sorted out later.
0 coins
Jabari-Jo
Good point about perfection vs priority. Too many lenders get caught up in PMSI timing and forget about basic perfection requirements.
0 coins
Kristin Frank
The blanket lien holder might not even contest your PMSI claim if your collateral description is specific enough. Most blanket lenders expect equipment financing to take PMSI priority as long as the formalities are met. Your comma issue is probably more of a technical perfection problem than a priority problem.
0 coins
Micah Trail
That's optimistic. I've seen blanket lenders fight PMSI claims tooth and nail, especially on larger equipment loans.
0 coins
Nia Watson
Depends on the lender and the loan terms. Some blanket lenders specifically carve out PMSI equipment in their loan agreements.
0 coins
Alberto Souchard
For an $85K equipment loan, it's probably worth fighting for PMSI priority. That's not pocket change.
0 coins