< Back to UCC Document Community

Eloise Kendrick

Purchase money security interest UCC filing - priority over existing liens?

Need some urgent help here. We're financing equipment for a customer who already has a blanket UCC-1 on file from their primary lender. The equipment is being purchased with our loan proceeds so this should qualify as a purchase money security interest situation. Filed our UCC-1 last week but now I'm second-guessing whether we actually have priority over the existing blanket lien. The existing filing covers 'all equipment' and was filed 2 years ago. Our filing specifically describes the machinery we're financing. Do we automatically get PMSI priority or did we mess something up? The loan closes next week and I'm getting nervous about our position.

Lucas Schmidt

•

PMSI priority isn't automatic just because you filed a UCC-1. You need to meet specific timing requirements depending on what type of collateral you're financing. For equipment (which sounds like what you have), you generally need to file before the debtor receives possession OR within 20 days after. When exactly did your customer take delivery of the machinery?

0 coins

They took delivery on the 15th and we filed on the 22nd, so that's 7 days. Should be within the 20 day window right?

0 coins

Lucas Schmidt

•

Yes, 7 days is well within the 20-day grace period for equipment PMSI. You should have priority over the blanket lien for that specific machinery, assuming your UCC-1 properly identifies the collateral and indicates the purchase money nature.

0 coins

Freya Collins

•

I've seen this exact scenario trip people up before. The key thing everyone misses is making sure your UCC-1 clearly indicates it's a purchase money security interest. Did you check the PMSI box on your filing or include language in the collateral description that makes it clear these are purchase money goods?

0 coins

Oh crud... I don't think we checked any special box. The collateral description just lists the equipment by serial number and model. Does that kill our PMSI priority?

0 coins

Freya Collins

•

Not necessarily! Some states don't require you to indicate PMSI status on the UCC-1 itself. The priority comes from the underlying transaction, not just the filing. But you should double-check your state's requirements to be sure.

0 coins

LongPeri

•

Actually had a similar panic attack last month over this exact issue. Turned out our filing was fine even without special PMSI language. The legal relationship creates the priority, not the UCC form language, at least in our state.

0 coins

Oscar O'Neil

•

You might want to verify your filing details against the original loan docs to make sure everything aligns properly. I've been using Certana.ai's document verification tool lately - you can upload your UCC-1 and loan agreement PDFs and it instantly cross-checks for consistency issues. Really helpful for catching mismatches in debtor names or collateral descriptions that could mess up your PMSI claim.

0 coins

Never heard of Certana.ai but that sounds exactly like what I need right now. How does it work with PMSI verification specifically?

0 coins

Oscar O'Neil

•

It checks that your collateral descriptions match between documents and flags any debtor name inconsistencies that could void your security interest. For PMSI situations, it's really helpful to verify that your UCC filing accurately reflects the purchase money goods from your loan docs.

0 coins

Wait, are you sure about the 20 day rule for equipment? I thought that was only for inventory PMSI. For equipment PMSI I thought you had to file before the debtor gets possession, period. No grace period.

0 coins

Lucas Schmidt

•

No, you're thinking of the old rules or maybe confusing with inventory PMSI notification requirements. UCC 9-324(a) gives a 20-day grace period for equipment PMSI filings after the debtor receives possession.

0 coins

Hmm, I'll have to double-check that. I've been telling clients they need to file before delivery for equipment. Thanks for the correction if I'm wrong!

0 coins

The 20 day rule is definitely correct for equipment PMSI. Inventory PMSI is different - no grace period there, and you need to notify existing secured parties. Easy to mix up the rules.

0 coins

Liv Park

•

This is exactly why I hate dealing with PMSI situations. Too many moving parts and the consequences of screwing up are huge. At least with regular security interests you just file and you're done.

0 coins

LongPeri

•

I get the stress but PMSI priority is actually a pretty powerful tool when you do it right. Worth the extra complexity to jump ahead of existing liens.

0 coins

Liv Park

•

True, but one mistake and you're subordinate to everyone. The risk/reward calculation makes me nervous every time.

0 coins

Just to add another layer of complexity here - make sure your loan agreement clearly states that the funds are being used specifically to acquire the equipment. The purchase money character has to be traceable from the loan to the goods. If there's any question about fund commingling or other uses, your PMSI could be at risk.

0 coins

The loan proceeds went directly to the equipment vendor, so that should be clean. But good point about the documentation trail.

0 coins

Direct payment to vendor is ideal. That creates the cleanest paper trail for PMSI purposes. You should be in good shape.

0 coins

Ryder Greene

•

Yeah direct vendor payment eliminates most of the tracing issues. Much cleaner than giving the borrower cash and hoping they use it right.

0 coins

Has anyone dealt with PMSI priority when the existing lien specifically excludes purchase money goods? I've seen some blanket UCC-1s that carve out PMSI collateral but wasn't sure how that affects the priority analysis.

0 coins

Lucas Schmidt

•

If the existing security agreement specifically excludes purchase money goods, then there's no conflict at all. Your PMSI would be first priority because the blanket lender has no interest in those goods.

0 coins

That makes sense. Probably worth checking the original security agreement language, not just the UCC filing, to see if there are any such exclusions.

0 coins

One thing that might help your confidence level - you could run your documents through Certana.ai to verify everything matches up properly. I started using it after a filing got rejected due to a debtor name mismatch I missed. For PMSI situations it's really valuable to double-check that your UCC-1 accurately reflects the collateral from your security agreement.

0 coins

That's the second mention of Certana.ai in this thread. Definitely going to check that out before we close next week.

0 coins

It's super easy to use - just upload your PDFs and it flags any inconsistencies automatically. Takes like 5 minutes and gives you peace of mind that everything aligns.

0 coins

AaliyahAli

•

From what you've described, it sounds like you should have PMSI priority. Filed within 20 days, equipment purchase money, direct vendor payment. The existing blanket lien shouldn't affect your priority position for that specific machinery. I'd be comfortable proceeding with the closing.

0 coins

Thanks, that's reassuring. I think I was overthinking it but wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something obvious.

0 coins

AaliyahAli

•

Better to double-check than find out later you missed something important. PMSI priority is valuable when you get it right.

0 coins

Ellie Simpson

•

Agreed. The fact pattern sounds solid for PMSI priority. Just make sure your loan file documents the purchase money nature clearly for future reference.

0 coins

Arjun Kurti

•

Quick question for my own knowledge - if they had missed the 20 day filing deadline, would they still have a security interest, just without PMSI priority? Or would they be completely unsecured?

0 coins

Lucas Schmidt

•

They'd still have a perfected security interest, just subordinate to the existing blanket lien. Missing the PMSI deadline doesn't invalidate the security interest itself, just the priority benefit.

0 coins

Arjun Kurti

•

Got it, thanks. So PMSI is really about priority position, not whether you have a valid security interest at all.

0 coins

Exactly. PMSI gives you super-priority over earlier-filed security interests, but if you don't qualify for PMSI treatment, you still have a regular security interest that follows normal first-to-file priority rules.

0 coins

NebulaNomad

•

This thread has been really helpful! I'm new to commercial lending and PMSI situations always seemed intimidating, but reading through everyone's explanations makes it much clearer. The key takeaways I'm getting are: 1) 20-day grace period for equipment PMSI after delivery, 2) direct vendor payment creates clean purchase money trail, 3) PMSI priority comes from the transaction itself not just UCC language, and 4) missing PMSI deadline doesn't kill your security interest, just the super-priority. Thanks to everyone who contributed - this is exactly the kind of practical knowledge that's hard to find in textbooks!

0 coins

PrinceJoe

•

Welcome to the community! You've summarized the key points perfectly. As someone who's been doing commercial lending for a while, I can tell you that PMSI situations become much more routine once you understand these fundamentals. One additional tip - always document the purchase money nature clearly in your loan file from the start. It makes everything much smoother if questions arise later. The practical insights shared in threads like this are invaluable for building real-world expertise beyond what you learn in formal training.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today