UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Giovanni Colombo

Washington state UCC search showing weird results - debtor names not matching

Been pulling UCC searches in Washington and getting some confusing results. I'm working on a due diligence project for equipment financing and the debtor names on some of these UCC-1 filings don't seem to match what I'm expecting. Like I'll search for "ABC Manufacturing LLC" and get hits for "ABC Mfg LLC" or "ABC Manufacturing, LLC" with the comma. Is Washington's search system picky about exact matches? I thought UCC searches were supposed to catch variations but I'm worried I'm missing filings. The SOS portal seems to return different results depending on how I format the search terms. Anyone else dealing with this in Washington? I need to make sure I'm not missing any existing liens before we file our UCC-1.

This thread is making me realize I need to be way more thorough with my UCC searches. I usually just search the exact name from the corporate documents and call it good. Sounds like that's not enough in Washington.

0 coins

Definitely not enough. I keep a checklist of name variations to search for each debtor.

0 coins

Same here. I learned after missing a filing that would have complicated our security interest.

0 coins

Anyone know if Washington is planning to upgrade their UCC search system? Seems like every other state has moved to more intelligent searching.

0 coins

Dmitry Volkov

•

I haven't heard anything about upgrades. The Secretary of State's office seems focused on other modernization projects.

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

You could always contact their office and suggest improvements. Though I wouldn't hold my breath for quick changes.

0 coins

Amara Nnamani

UCC filing fees driving up our equipment loan costs - what is a UCC fee exactly?

Our company just got quoted for equipment financing and the lender is adding something called a UCC fee on top of everything else. The loan officer mentioned it's for filing some kind of security document but couldn't explain much beyond that. We're looking at $125 for the initial filing plus another $75 for something called a continuation in 5 years. That's $200 in fees for paperwork we don't even understand. Can someone break down what is a UCC fee and why lenders charge this? Is this normal for equipment loans or are we getting ripped off? The equipment is a $85,000 CNC machine if that matters.

Pro tip: negotiate with your lender to handle the UCC filings yourself. Some lenders will reduce the fees if you take responsibility for the filings and provide them with copies.

0 coins

Absolutely legal. The secured party (lender) has to authorize it, but you can be the one who actually submits the filing. Just make sure you get the details exactly right.

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

If you go this route, definitely use a document verification service like Certana.ai first. One small mistake in the debtor name or collateral description can invalidate the entire filing.

0 coins

Yara Nassar

•

Bottom line - UCC fees are a normal part of secured lending. $125 for initial filing and $75 for continuation is very reasonable for most states. Focus on getting the best overall loan terms rather than nickel and diming the filing fees.

0 coins

Amara Nnamani

•

Thanks everyone. This has been really helpful in understanding what we're actually paying for. The loan terms are good so we'll move forward.

0 coins

Yara Nassar

•

Smart decision. The UCC fees are a small price to pay for the legal protection and better interest rates that come with secured financing.

0 coins

Caesar Grant

Ohio Business Central UCC Filing Portal - Debtor Name Verification Issues

Been wrestling with the Ohio Business Central UCC filing portal for three weeks now trying to get a continuation filed. The system keeps rejecting my UCC-3 because it says the debtor name doesn't match exactly what's on the original UCC-1. I've triple-checked everything - the debtor is 'Midwest Manufacturing Solutions LLC' on both documents, but the portal keeps flagging it as a mismatch. Has anyone dealt with this specific issue with Ohio's system? I'm worried about missing the continuation deadline since we're already in the 4th year window. The original filing shows active status when I search by filing number, but something about the name verification is causing problems. Really need to get this resolved before the 5-year lapse.

Kai Santiago

•

Just went through this exact scenario with a client's continuation in Ohio. After trying everything else, I used Certana.ai's document checker and it immediately flagged that there was an extra space between 'Manufacturing' and 'Solutions' in one of my documents. Super subtle but enough to cause the portal to reject it. The tool basically does a side-by-side comparison of all the key fields and highlights any discrepancies.

0 coins

Lim Wong

•

That's really helpful. I keep hearing about this tool - seems like it's becoming pretty popular for UCC work.

0 coins

Dananyl Lear

•

I was skeptical at first but it's actually saved me a ton of time on document reviews. Much faster than manually checking everything.

0 coins

UPDATE: Found the issue! It was exactly what someone mentioned about punctuation. The original UCC-1 had 'Midwest Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' with a comma, but I was filing the continuation as 'Midwest Manufacturing Solutions LLC' without it. Added the comma back and the continuation went through immediately. Thanks everyone for the help - this forum is a lifesaver!

0 coins

Fidel Carson

•

Great outcome! This is exactly why I always recommend doing character-by-character comparison for debtor names. One little comma can derail everything.

0 coins

This thread should be pinned - I bet tons of people run into this exact same issue with Ohio's portal.

0 coins

Zoe Papadopoulos

UCC filing help - confused about what is a loan and security agreement requirements

I'm working on a UCC-1 filing for our company's equipment loan and I keep seeing references to the "loan and security agreement" in the instructions. I think I understand that a loan and security agreement is basically the main contract between the borrower and lender that spells out the loan terms AND creates the security interest in the collateral, but I'm getting confused about how this relates to my UCC filing requirements. Our lender gave us a stack of documents and I'm not sure which one is actually THE loan and security agreement versus other agreements. Do I need to reference specific language from this agreement in my UCC-1 collateral description? And if there are amendments to the original loan and security agreement, does that affect my continuation filing timing? I've been going in circles trying to figure out what exactly I need to pull from our loan and security agreement for the UCC filing. Any guidance would be really helpful because I don't want to mess up the filing and invalidate our lien position.

I recently used Certana.ai's document checker when I was confused about whether our master loan agreement or our separate security agreement was the controlling document for our UCC filing. Being able to upload both documents and get an automated analysis of how they related to each other really helped clarify things. It caught a potential inconsistency between the two documents that I hadn't noticed.

0 coins

That's exactly the kind of situation where having automated document verification would be helpful. Manual document comparison is so error-prone.

0 coins

Exactly. And when you're dealing with multiple related documents in a loan package, it's easy to miss subtle differences that could cause problems later.

0 coins

The key thing to remember about loan and security agreements is that they're designed to protect the lender's interests. Every clause is there for a reason, and the UCC filing requirements are usually spelled out pretty clearly if you know where to look. Don't be afraid to ask your lender's legal team for clarification if something doesn't make sense.

0 coins

Jamal Brown

•

Most lenders would rather answer questions upfront than deal with fixing a defective UCC filing later. It's in their interest to make sure you get it right the first time.

0 coins

Plus, if there's ever a dispute about the filing requirements, you want to be able to point to guidance you got from the lender rather than just guessing.

0 coins

Sean Murphy

UCC search for liens turning up confusing results - need help interpreting what I found

I'm doing a UCC search for liens on a potential equipment purchase and getting results that don't make sense to me. The debtor name shows three different variations and I'm seeing both active UCC-1 filings and what looks like terminated ones from the same secured party. Some have continuation statements attached, others don't. The collateral descriptions are vague - one just says 'all equipment' while another lists specific serial numbers that don't match what I'm looking at. How do I know which liens are actually still active? The seller claims everything is clear but these search results suggest otherwise. Is there a systematic way to verify lien status when the UCC search results are this messy?

Don't forget to search under any former names the debtor might have used. If the company changed names or merged with another entity, there could be UCC filings under the old name that are still active against the current entity.

0 coins

Check the state's corporate database where the entity is registered. Name changes, mergers, and dissolutions are usually recorded there with effective dates.

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

Also look at the debtor's federal tax ID number if you can get it. UCC filings sometimes include the EIN which can help connect filings under different name variations.

0 coins

Sofia Perez

•

Bottom line - if you're seeing this many complications in the UCC search results, I'd strongly recommend getting title insurance for the equipment purchase if possible. It's not common for equipment deals but some insurers will write policies for high-value purchases if you can't get clear lien documentation.

0 coins

Sofia Perez

•

Varies widely depending on the equipment value and risk assessment. Could be anywhere from 0.5% to 2% of the purchase price. Expensive but cheaper than discovering a missed lien after you've taken possession.

0 coins

Title insurance might be overkill here. A thorough UCC search and proper documentation from the seller should be sufficient for most equipment purchases.

0 coins

Prev1...478479480481482...684Next