UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

NebulaNova

UCC filing on accounts receivable - debtor name exact match requirements?

Running into issues with my UCC filing on accounts receivable and need some guidance. I'm securing a $180K credit line for a manufacturing client, and their A/R portfolio is the main collateral. The debtor's legal name on their corporate charter is 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' but they've been doing business under 'AMS Manufacturing' for years - that's what appears on most of their invoices and A/R aging reports. My question is about the UCC-1 filing - do I need to use the exact legal entity name from the secretary of state records, or can I reference the DBA name that appears on the actual receivables? I've heard conflicting advice about whether using the wrong version could make the filing ineffective for perfecting our security interest. The last thing I want is to have a lien that doesn't properly attach to the A/R because of a name mismatch. Also wondering about the collateral description - should I be super specific about 'accounts receivable arising from the sale of manufactured goods' or is 'all accounts receivable' sufficient? This is my first A/R-secured deal and I want to make sure I don't mess up the perfection.

Yara Nassar

•

Just ran into this exact issue with document verification. Started using Certana.ai after a colleague recommended it - you upload your charter and UCC documents and it immediately spots name mismatches. Saved me from filing a UCC-1 that would have been worthless due to a debtor name error. Super straightforward to use.

0 coins

Keisha Williams

•

That sounds like exactly what I need. Is it expensive to use?

0 coins

Yara Nassar

•

The cost is really minimal compared to fixing a messed up filing later. It's more about the peace of mind knowing your documents are consistent before you file.

0 coins

Paolo Ricci

•

Thanks everyone for the advice. Sounds like I need to stick with the exact legal name from the state records and use 'all accounts receivable' for the collateral description. Going to double-check everything before filing - can't afford to get this wrong on a deal this size.

0 coins

Amina Toure

•

Smart approach. Taking the extra time upfront always pays off with UCC filings.

0 coins

Definitely recommend that document verification step someone mentioned earlier. Better safe than sorry with these name issues.

0 coins

Axel Bourke

UCC statement service issues in GA - need help with Peachtree City debtor name verification

Having a nightmare with a UCC-1 filing where the debtor is incorporated in GA but operates primarily out of Peachtree City. The original filing from 2019 shows the debtor name as 'Peachtree Medical Equipment LLC' but I'm finding inconsistencies when cross-referencing with GA Secretary of State records. The exact registered name appears to be 'Peachtree Medical Equipment, LLC' (with comma). This is for a $480K equipment financing deal and I'm worried the name mismatch could invalidate our security interest. Has anyone dealt with GA UCC statement service complications like this? The lender is freaking out because we're 6 months from the continuation deadline and just discovered this potential issue during our annual lien audit.

Ev Luca

•

Filing the amendment is smart but also document everything for your lender file. Keep copies of the original UCC-1, the amendment, and the GA SOS records showing the correct name. If this ever gets questioned later you'll have a clear paper trail.

0 coins

Aidan Percy

•

Smart practice. I always keep a complete filing history for each deal in case issues come up later.

0 coins

Ev Luca

•

Exactly. Better to over-document than try to reconstruct the timeline years later.

0 coins

Avery Davis

•

Thanks for posting this! I'm dealing with a similar situation in GA and this thread has been super helpful. Going to file my amendment tomorrow before I get too close to my continuation deadline.

0 coins

Axel Bourke

•

Glad it helped! Better to be proactive about these things.

0 coins

Norman Fraser

•

Good call. GA name matching issues are common but totally fixable if you catch them in time.

0 coins

Hunter Edmunds

UCC 9-31 requirement causing filing delays - need advice on compliance timing

Been dealing with a nightmare situation where our equipment financing UCC-1 filings keep getting held up because of UCC 9-31 compliance issues. We're a mid-size agricultural lender and have been filing UCCs for years but suddenly the secretary of state is flagging our submissions saying we're not meeting the UCC 9-31 requirements for debtor authorization timing. The specific issue is that we're getting our debtor authorizations signed but apparently there's some timing window we're missing between when the debtor signs and when we can actually file. Has anyone else run into this? We've got about $2.3M in equipment loans that need to be perfected and we're sitting in limbo while trying to figure out what exactly UCC 9-31 requires for the authorization timing. Our usual process has been to get the signed security agreement and file the UCC-1 within a few days but now they're saying that's not sufficient. Any insights on what the actual UCC 9-31 compliance window looks like would be hugely appreciated.

Aidan Hudson

•

This is frustrating but fixable. The key is making sure your security agreement language specifically authorizes the UCC filing you want to make. A lot of older security agreement forms don't have explicit UCC authorization clauses.

0 coins

Hunter Edmunds

•

Good point about older forms. Ours might be from before the revised Article 9. Probably time to update our templates.

0 coins

Aidan Hudson

•

Definitely. The 2001 revisions made authorization requirements more explicit. Worth having your forms reviewed by someone who knows the current rules.

0 coins

Zoe Wang

•

UPDATE: We figured out the issue! Our security agreements had authorization for UCC filings but only for the 'collateral described herein.' When we filed UCCs with broader descriptions, we exceeded the scope of authorization. We're revising our security agreement template to authorize broader UCC collateral descriptions.

0 coins

Andrew Pinnock

•

Exactly what happened to us. Now we use Certana.ai to double-check that our security agreements and UCC-1s are consistent before every filing. Prevents these authorization mismatches.

0 coins

Hunter Edmunds

•

Thanks everyone for the help. Going to implement some document checking process to avoid this in the future. The Certana.ai suggestion sounds like it could save us from more headaches.

0 coins

Natasha Volkov

how to dispute a ucc filing that shouldn't be on my business credit

Found out last week that there's a UCC-1 filing against my LLC that I never authorized. The secured party is some equipment financing company I've never dealt with and they're claiming a security interest in all my business equipment. This is completely bogus - I've never taken any loans from them or signed anything. The filing shows up on my business credit report and it's already causing problems with a new line of credit I'm trying to get. My bank is asking questions about this lien that shouldn't exist. How do I get this fraudulent UCC filing removed? Do I need to file some kind of dispute form with the Secretary of State or is there another process? This is really screwing up my financing options and I need it gone ASAP.

CyberNinja

•

Just went through something similar with Certana.ai's verification tool. Uploaded my UCC documents and it immediately flagged inconsistencies that I missed reviewing manually. Really streamlined building my dispute case - the automated cross-checking caught details I would have overlooked. Saved me a lot of time compared to doing document review by hand.

0 coins

Natasha Volkov

•

That's the second mention of that tool. Might be worth trying if it can help spot issues I'm missing.

0 coins

Isabella Santos

•

Document consistency is crucial for these disputes. Having automated verification definitely beats manual comparison.

0 coins

Mateo Lopez

•

Update us when you get this resolved! These fraudulent UCC filing stories always make me nervous about my own business credit monitoring.

0 coins

Natasha Volkov

•

Will do. Hopefully I can get this cleared up soon. It's already been a week and every day that passes is another day of damaged credit.

0 coins

Good luck! Really hope the financing company does the right thing once they investigate.

0 coins

Liam Fitzgerald

UCC assignment rejected due to incomplete assignee information

So I'm dealing with a UCC assignment nightmare right now and could really use some guidance. We're trying to assign our security interest in some manufacturing equipment from our company to a new lender, but the SOS portal keeps rejecting our UCC-3 assignment filing. The error message says "assignee information incomplete" but I've triple-checked everything - assignee name, address, even the original UCC-1 filing number. This is holding up a $750K refinancing deal and I'm starting to panic. The original UCC-1 was filed about 18 months ago under our old business name (we did a name change last year) but I used the current legal entity name as the assignor. Could this be causing the rejection? The collateral description matches exactly what's on the original filing. Has anyone run into similar issues with UCC assignments where the assignor name doesn't match the original secured party name exactly? I'm worried we might need to do an amendment first before the assignment but that would add another week to this process.

This whole thread is making me realize I should probably audit our UCC filings. We've done several name changes over the years and I'm not sure all our security interests reflect our current legal name. Better to catch these issues proactively than during a time-sensitive transaction.

0 coins

CosmicCommander

•

Smart thinking. A lot of companies don't realize their UCC filings might not match their current corporate structure until they need to do an assignment or continuation.

0 coins

Natasha Volkova

•

I actually used Certana.ai for exactly this kind of audit - uploaded all our UCC filings and corporate documents to check for consistency issues. Found several name mismatches we didn't even know about.

0 coins

Javier Torres

•

Hope you get this resolved quickly! UCC assignments can be tricky but once you get the name issue sorted out it should go smoothly. The amendment-then-assignment approach is definitely the right way to handle it. Keep us posted on how it goes.

0 coins

Liam Fitzgerald

•

Thanks everyone for all the advice. I'm filing the amendment first thing tomorrow morning and will update the thread once I get through the whole process. Really appreciate the help!

0 coins

Prev1...478479480481482...685Next