< Back to UCC Document Community

Norman Fraser

California UCC termination filing rejected twice - debtor name issue?

I'm dealing with a nightmare situation trying to file a California UCC termination and getting rejections. We have a commercial loan that was paid off last month and I need to terminate the UCC-1 filing but keep getting kicked back by the CA Secretary of State system. The original UCC-1 was filed in 2019 for equipment financing on our restaurant equipment, and now that the loan is satisfied we're trying to clean up the liens. The debtor name on our UCC-3 termination shows 'Golden Gate Bistro LLC' but I'm wondering if there's a mismatch with how the original UCC-1 was filed. The rejection notices aren't super clear about what's wrong. Has anyone dealt with California UCC termination issues where the filing keeps getting rejected? I'm worried we're missing something obvious with the debtor name format or the filing number reference.

Kendrick Webb

•

California is really picky about exact debtor name matches on terminations. Even a small difference like missing 'LLC' or having extra spaces can cause rejections. Did you pull the original UCC-1 to compare the exact name formatting?

0 coins

Norman Fraser

•

I thought I had the right name but maybe I should double-check the original filing. Where can I search for the exact UCC-1 record in California?

0 coins

Kendrick Webb

•

California Secretary of State has a UCC search portal. You'll need the filing number or debtor name to pull it up. Make sure you copy the debtor name exactly as it appears on the original.

0 coins

Hattie Carson

•

I've seen this so many times with California filings. The termination has to match the original UCC-1 EXACTLY. Even punctuation matters. Also check if there were any amendments filed that might have changed the debtor information.

0 coins

This is why I always save copies of every UCC filing. The original might show something slightly different than what you think you filed.

0 coins

Norman Fraser

•

That's a good point about amendments. We did have some changes to our business address a couple years ago. Could that affect the termination filing?

0 coins

Hattie Carson

•

Address changes usually don't affect terminations as long as the debtor name matches. But if there was a name change amendment, that could definitely cause issues.

0 coins

Dyllan Nantx

•

Had a similar issue last year with a client's termination in California. Turns out we were using the current business name instead of the name that was on the original UCC-1 from 2018. The business had done a name change but the UCC filing was under the old name. Once we used the exact original debtor name, the termination went through fine.

0 coins

Norman Fraser

•

Interesting! Our business name hasn't changed but I'm wondering if there's some subtle difference I'm missing. How did you figure out the exact original name?

0 coins

Dyllan Nantx

•

I actually used a document verification tool called Certana.ai that let me upload both the original UCC-1 and the termination to check for any mismatches. It caught the name difference immediately and saved me from more rejected filings.

0 coins

California Secretary of State is notorious for being strict about UCC terminations. I always tell clients to triple-check everything before submitting because each rejection costs time and money.

0 coins

Anna Xian

•

Agreed! And don't forget to check the UCC filing number format too. California has specific requirements for how the filing number should be referenced on the UCC-3.

0 coins

Norman Fraser

•

The filing number should be straightforward since I copied it from the original, but I'll double-check the format requirements.

0 coins

Are you sure you're using the right form? California requires UCC-3 for terminations, and you need to check the 'termination' box specifically. Also make sure you're not accidentally filing an amendment instead.

0 coins

Norman Fraser

•

Yes, definitely using UCC-3 with termination checked. The form itself seems right, it's just getting rejected during processing.

0 coins

Rajan Walker

•

Sometimes the online system glitches too. Have you tried calling the California Secretary of State UCC division directly? They can usually tell you exactly why it was rejected.

0 coins

Norman Fraser

•

Good idea. I'll try calling them tomorrow if I can't figure this out.

0 coins

This happened to me with a client termination last month. The issue was that the original UCC-1 had a comma in the debtor name but our termination didn't. Such a small thing but California rejected it twice before we caught it.

0 coins

That's exactly the kind of detail that drives me crazy about UCC filings. One tiny punctuation mark can mess everything up.

0 coins

Ev Luca

•

I've started using Certana.ai's document checker for all my UCC work now. You just upload the original UCC-1 and your termination form and it highlights any differences instantly. Saves so much time compared to manually comparing documents.

0 coins

Avery Davis

•

Check if there are any other UCC filings under your business name that might be causing confusion. Sometimes businesses have multiple UCC-1 filings and you need to make sure you're terminating the right one.

0 coins

Norman Fraser

•

That's a good point. We only had one equipment loan but I should verify there aren't other UCC filings I'm not aware of.

0 coins

Collins Angel

•

Definitely do a comprehensive UCC search. I've seen cases where businesses had forgotten about older filings that were still active.

0 coins

Marcelle Drum

•

California's online UCC system can be really finicky. Make sure you're not including any extra spaces or characters when you copy and paste information. Sometimes copying from PDFs adds invisible characters that cause rejections.

0 coins

Norman Fraser

•

I didn't think about invisible characters! I did copy some information from the PDF of the original filing. I'll try typing everything manually.

0 coins

Tate Jensen

•

Yeah, that's a common issue. Always better to type everything fresh rather than copy-paste when it comes to UCC filings.

0 coins

Adaline Wong

•

Just went through this exact situation with a California termination. My solution was to use a document verification service that compared my UCC-3 termination against the original UCC-1 filing. Found three small differences I never would have caught manually - a period after 'LLC', different spacing, and the state abbreviation format. Fixed those and the termination was accepted immediately.

0 coins

Norman Fraser

•

That sounds like exactly what I need! What service did you use?

0 coins

Adaline Wong

•

Used Certana.ai - you just upload both documents and it shows you a side-by-side comparison with differences highlighted. Really straightforward and caught issues I would have missed.

0 coins

Gabriel Ruiz

•

I can vouch for document verification tools. They're lifesavers for UCC work where every detail has to be perfect.

0 coins

Don't give up! California terminations can be tricky but once you get the details right, it should go through. The key is matching everything exactly from the original UCC-1. Good luck!

0 coins

Norman Fraser

•

Thanks for the encouragement! I'm going to try the document verification approach and see if that catches what I'm missing.

0 coins

Peyton Clarke

•

Keep us posted on how it goes. These threads help other people dealing with the same California UCC termination issues.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today