


Ask the community...
This reminds me of a situation we had where the UCC search was showing the wrong debtor name entirely - turned out someone at the filing office had a typo when entering our electronic submission. The moral of the story is to always verify your critical filings immediately after submission, not months later during due diligence. I started using automated verification tools after that fiasco.
Which verification tools do you use? I'm dealing with more UCC filings lately and want to avoid these kinds of surprises.
I use Certana.ai now - you just upload your documents and it flags any inconsistencies between your loan paperwork and UCC filings. Really wish it had been available a few years ago when I was doing everything manually.
Just wanted to add that Delaware has been having intermittent portal issues all month. I've had search results show up blank, display wrong dates, and show incorrect filing statuses. If you're dealing with a time-sensitive transaction, definitely call rather than relying on the online search.
Really? I haven't noticed any issues but I mostly just do basic name searches. Maybe the problems are more noticeable with detailed record reviews.
Just went through something similar with a client who had multiple entity names. Ended up using one of those document comparison tools where you upload the search results and it flags potential duplicates or related filings. Found two UCCs I would have missed doing manual searches. Worth the investment for peace of mind.
Which tool did you use? I've been thinking about trying some of the automated options but wasn't sure which ones actually work well for UCC searches.
I used Certana.ai - you just upload the PDFs of your search results and it cross-references everything. Pretty straightforward and caught the connections I missed.
Update us when you figure this out! I have a similar situation coming up with a borrower that's gone through several name changes and I'm dreading the search process. Would love to know what approach ends up working best for you.
Will do. Based on all the advice here I'm going to try a combination of broader searches, entity record verification, and probably one of the automated comparison tools. I'll report back on what I find.
Good luck! This kind of thorough searching is exactly why UCC due diligence takes longer than clients expect, but it's so important to get it right.
One thing to remember - incidental damages under UCC are limited to reasonable expenses. If you spent $5000 to recover $3000 in collateral value, a court might question the reasonableness of your expenses.
Thanks everyone for the detailed responses. Sounds like our storage, transport, and prep costs should be solid. Will definitely document everything carefully and probably skip trying to recover the lost rent. The Certana.ai suggestion is interesting - might be worth checking our security agreement language to make sure we're covered.
Yeah we kept pretty good records thankfully. This discussion has been really helpful for understanding what we can actually claim.
Has anyone dealt with continuation filings for international equipment? I'm coming up on a 5-year anniversary for one of my UCC-1s and wondering if the fact that some equipment has moved overseas affects the continuation process.
Continuation is straightforward - just file your UCC-3 continuation within 6 months before the 5-year lapse date. Equipment location doesn't affect the continuation timing, only the debtor's state of organization matters for that.
Good to know. I was overthinking it. The international aspect really does complicate everything else but apparently not the basic UCC maintenance.
Going back to the original question about collateral descriptions - I'd strongly recommend getting your current UCC-1 reviewed by someone experienced with international transactions before you make any amendments. Small changes can have big implications when equipment crosses borders regularly.
Agreed. I think I'm going to run everything through that document checking tool first to identify any immediate issues, then consult with our international team about the cross-border implications. Thanks everyone for the insights.
Smart approach. Better to invest time upfront in getting the documentation right than to discover problems when you need to enforce your security interest.
Brielle Johnson
Update us when you get the corrected filing accepted! These stories help everyone learn what to watch out for. The security and pledge agreement name matching issue comes up more often than it should.
0 coins
Honorah King
•Agreed, always good to hear how these situations get resolved.
0 coins
Oliver Brown
•Hopefully the correction goes through smoothly and there are no other surprises.
0 coins
Mary Bates
One more thing - document the rejection and your corrective action in the loan file. Some auditors want to see evidence that UCC rejections were promptly addressed, especially when there's a gap between the security and pledge agreement execution and successful UCC perfection.
0 coins
Ayla Kumar
•Include timestamps and screenshots of the rejection notice too. Shows you acted quickly to fix the problem.
0 coins
Lorenzo McCormick
•This kind of documentation saved me during our last compliance review. Showed we had proper controls even when mistakes happened.
0 coins