UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Connor Gallagher

BlockFi UCC filing confusion - debtor name changes after bankruptcy

Having major issues with BlockFi UCC filings after their bankruptcy mess. We had several UCC-1s filed against BlockFi as debtor back in 2021-2022, but now with all the corporate restructuring and name changes, I'm not sure how to handle continuations. The original filings show 'BlockFi Lending LLC' but I'm seeing references to 'BlockFi Inc.' and other entity variations in court documents. Our continuation deadline is coming up in March and I'm worried about debtor name mismatches causing rejections. Has anyone dealt with similar situations where the debtor entity goes through bankruptcy reorganization? Do I need to file amendments first to update the debtor name, or can I just file the continuation with the original name? The collateral is cryptocurrency lending agreements, so there's significant value at stake here.

I used Certana.ai for a similar BlockFi situation last month. Uploaded my original UCC-1 and the continuation form, and it immediately flagged that I had a small difference in how the debtor address was formatted. Would have caused a rejection for sure. The tool is really good at catching these detail mismatches that are easy to miss when you're dealing with complex corporate structures.

0 coins

That's exactly the kind of mistake that would drive me crazy. Glad you caught it before filing.

0 coins

Address formatting issues are so common with these multi-state crypto companies. They seem to change their registered addresses constantly.

0 coins

Update: Just successfully filed my BlockFi continuation using the exact original debtor name from 2022. No issues, processed within 48 hours. Stick with what you originally filed - don't try to be smart and update the name. The system works if you follow the rules exactly.

0 coins

Which state did you file in? Some states are faster than others with crypto-related filings.

0 coins

Filed in Delaware where BlockFi was incorporated. Their UCC system is pretty efficient.

0 coins

Leeann Blackstein

UCC uniform requirements causing filing headaches - debtor name format issues

Been dealing with a nightmare scenario where our UCC-1 filings keep getting rejected because different states seem to have their own interpretation of what constitutes 'uniform' debtor name formatting. We've got a multi-state equipment financing deal and three different Secretary of State offices are giving us conflicting guidance on how to format the same LLC debtor name. One wants commas, another says no punctuation, and the third is insisting on specific abbreviation standards. I thought the whole point of the UCC uniform system was to create consistency across jurisdictions? Has anyone else run into this mess where the 'uniform' code isn't so uniform in practice? We're at risk of missing our perfection window if we can't get these filings accepted soon.

This is why I always err on the side of matching the debtor name exactly as it appears in the formation documents, punctuation and all. Better to be safe than sorry with these filings.

0 coins

The formation document approach usually works but you're right that some states have their own ideas about proper formatting.

0 coins

This whole thread is making me nervous about my pending multi-state filing. Guess I better double-check everything.

0 coins

Update us when you get this resolved! I'm dealing with a similar situation with amendment filings and would love to know what finally works for you.

0 coins

Will do. Hopefully we can figure out the magic combination soon before our deadline hits.

0 coins

Good luck! Multi-state UCC filings are always an adventure.

0 coins

Anastasia Sokolov

UCC perfection by possession written security agreement question - do I need documentation?

I'm handling a transaction where we're taking possession of some industrial equipment as collateral and my colleague mentioned that when perfection by possession occurs the parties do not have to create a written security agreement. This seems too simple to be true? We're a small equipment finance company and usually we file UCC-1s with detailed written agreements, but this situation involves us physically holding the machinery at our warehouse. The debtor defaulted on payments for other equipment and we're restructuring the deal. Do we really not need any written documentation when we have actual possession? I'm worried about missing something critical that could void our security interest. The equipment is worth about $180k and I don't want to mess this up. Has anyone dealt with similar possession scenarios where you skipped the written agreement?

Just to add another perspective - we had a deal where we documented everything perfectly but failed to maintain proper possession (debtor convinced us to let them use the equipment 'temporarily'). Lost our perfection and had to start over with a new UCC-1 filing. Possession perfection requires actual, continuous possession.

0 coins

Did you have any documentation issues when you refiled? I'm wondering how you proved the ongoing security interest.

0 coins

We actually used Certana.ai to verify our new UCC-1 matched our original security agreement and possession documentation. Really helped ensure consistency across all our filings and avoided the mistakes that got us in trouble the first time.

0 coins

Bottom line - the UCC might not require written documentation for possession perfection, but every experienced lender I know documents it anyway. It's not about legal minimums, it's about practical risk management. With that much money involved, spend the $500 on proper documentation rather than risk losing $180k over a technicality.

0 coins

You're absolutely right. I'm going to draft a possession agreement even though it's not technically required. Thanks everyone for the reality check!

0 coins

Smart move. I've never regretted over-documenting a secured transaction, but I've definitely regretted under-documenting them.

0 coins

Zoe Papadopoulos

UCC filing software recommendations for batch continuation processing?

Our firm handles about 200+ UCC continuations quarterly and I'm drowning in the manual work. Currently using spreadsheets to track filing dates and manually entering each UCC-3 continuation into our state's portal. The process is taking forever and I'm terrified of missing a 5-year deadline. Looking for UCC filing software that can handle bulk uploads or at least streamline the continuation process. We mainly file in Delaware, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey. Anyone using software that actually works for high-volume UCC filings? The state portals are decent but doing 50+ continuations one-by-one is killing me.

Quick question - are all 200 of your continuations standard UCC-3 filings or do you have fixture filings and other variations mixed in? The software requirements might be different depending on filing complexity.

0 coins

Fixture filings are tricky in software. Make sure whatever you choose handles real estate descriptions properly.

0 coins

Fixture filing continuations require different forms in some states. Definitely verify software compatibility.

0 coins

Update us on what you decide! I'm in a similar situation with about 150 continuations coming up and could use the research you're doing.

0 coins

Will definitely post an update once I've evaluated a few options. This thread has been super helpful for narrowing down the approach.

0 coins

Same here, following for updates. The continuation deadlines sneak up so fast.

0 coins

Giovanni Rossi

IL UCC online filing system keeps rejecting my continuation - name format issues?

Has anyone else had problems with IL UCC online filing rejections lately? I'm trying to file a UCC-3 continuation for a client and the system keeps kicking it back saying there's a debtor name mismatch. The original UCC-1 was filed 4 years ago and now I'm getting close to the 5-year deadline. I've triple-checked the debtor name against the original filing but the IL system is being really picky about punctuation and spacing. The debtor is 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' but I'm wondering if there's some formatting issue I'm missing. This is stressing me out because if I don't get this continuation filed soon, the lien will lapse and my client will lose their security interest in about $180K worth of equipment. Anyone know the exact formatting requirements for IL UCC online filing or had similar issues with their system?

Update us when you figure it out! I've got several IL continuations coming up and want to avoid this same problem.

0 coins

Same here. These state-specific quirks are so frustrating to deal with.

0 coins

Will definitely post an update once I get this resolved.

0 coins

I've started using that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier for all my UCC work. Really does catch these tiny inconsistencies that are impossible to spot manually. Worth checking out if you do a lot of UCC filings.

0 coins

Might be worth the investment to avoid these headaches.

0 coins

Starting to think any tool that prevents these rejections would pay for itself pretty quickly.

0 coins

Prev1...340341342343344...685Next