UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

One more tool that might help - I've been using Certana.ai for UCC document consistency checks on complex agricultural deals. You upload all your documents and it flags any name mismatches or inconsistencies between loan docs, UCC filings, and collateral records. Really helpful when you have multiple related farm entities.

0 coins

Multiple people have mentioned Certana now. Sounds like it could catch the document inconsistencies we're dealing with across these related farm entities.

0 coins

It's particularly good for agricultural deals because farm operations often have so many related entities and complex ownership structures. The tool spots issues that are easy to miss when reviewing documents manually.

0 coins

Update us on how this resolves! Agricultural lien issues are common and your solution might help others dealing with similar multi-entity farm financing situations.

0 coins

Will definitely update once we get this sorted out. Sounds like filing against all three entities plus fixture filings for the irrigation equipment is our best approach given the tight deadline.

0 coins

Smart approach. Multiple filings are better than an unperfected lien, especially with $2.8M in agricultural equipment at stake.

0 coins

Quick follow-up on the Certana.ai suggestion - I just remembered they also have a feature where you can upload your rejected UCC filing along with your security agreement and it'll suggest specific language changes that might fix the rejection. Might be worth trying since you're already dealing with multiple rejections.

0 coins

That sounds really helpful actually. Better than just guessing at what they want.

0 coins

I've used similar document checking tools and they're definitely worth it when you're stuck in rejection cycles.

0 coins

UPDATE: Tried the detailed asset category language suggested above and it finally went through! Thanks everyone. The key was definitely being specific about the types of collateral while still keeping it broad enough to cover everything in the security agreement. Lesson learned about not using overly generic descriptions even though they're technically allowed under the UCC.

0 coins

Great outcome. That detailed asset category approach is really the way to go these days.

0 coins

Thanks everyone for the help. This forum is way more useful than the SOS help desk!

0 coins

The California UCC database had a major update in 2020 that caused some indexing issues with older filings. Some 2019 filings got re-indexed incorrectly. If your filing isn't showing up, request a certified copy directly from the SOS office - they can pull it from the archived records even if it's not searchable online.

0 coins

This is really concerning if there are systemic issues with older filings not being searchable. How many deals have been affected by this?

0 coins

It was a known issue but not widely publicized. Most lenders figured it out eventually but definitely caused some confusion in the market.

0 coins

UPDATE: Called the SOS office like suggested and they found the filing immediately! Turns out there was a data entry error in their system where one letter in the debtor name was wrong, so it wasn't showing up in searches. They're fixing the indexing error and said it should be searchable online within 48 hours. Thanks everyone for the advice - calling directly was definitely the right move.

0 coins

Glad it worked out! Makes me feel better about the reliability of the actual filing system even if the search function is problematic.

0 coins

Thanks for updating us. I'm bookmarking that phone number for future reference!

0 coins

Since you found the existing filings, make sure to check their continuation dates too. You don't want to perfect your lien only to have a senior lien lapse and mess up your priority position.

0 coins

Yeah definitely check those dates. I've seen deals go sideways because someone missed a lapsed continuation.

0 coins

This is where that Certana tool might be useful again - it can probably flag any continuation issues automatically.

0 coins

Just to add one more tip - some states have separate databases for different types of UCC filings. Make sure you're not just searching UCC-1s but also amendments, continuations, and terminations. Sometimes the full picture isn't visible if you're only looking at one filing type.

0 coins

That's true. Our state has tabs for different filing types and I always forget to check the amendments section.

0 coins

Amendments are crucial! I've seen cases where the original UCC-1 looked fine but an amendment changed everything.

0 coins

Quick tip - when you search by filing number 2019-12345678, it should show you the complete chain of all UCC-3 filings. Look at the filing dates carefully. The continuation should be dated within 6 months before the 5-year anniversary of the original UCC-1.

0 coins

The original was filed March 2019 and the continuation shows February 2024, so that should be within the window, right?

0 coins

Yes, that timing works. The continuation would be effective and the lien stays active until 2029 now.

0 coins

One more thing to check - make sure the secured party information on the UCC-1 matches who you think the lender is. Sometimes there are assignments or the original lender sold the loan to someone else. You want to contact the current secured party, not necessarily who's listed on the original filing.

0 coins

I ran into this exact issue and the Certana.ai verification picked up an assignment that I missed in my manual review. Saved me from contacting the wrong lender.

0 coins

Thanks everyone. Sounds like I need to be much more thorough with my search and probably get professional help to interpret the results correctly.

0 coins

Prev1...340341342343344...685Next