Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
This is why I always recommend keeping UCC-1 collateral descriptions simple and broad. Use 'all inventory' or 'all equipment' and let the security agreement handle the specifics. The filing office wants to know what TYPE of property, not what QUALITY of property.
Exactly. The UCC-1 and the security agreement serve different purposes. The UCC-1 is public notice, the security agreement is private contract terms.
Grace Durand
•I learned this the hard way too. Now I run everything through Certana.ai first to check for these kinds of description issues before filing.
Steven Adams
Update: We refiled with 'all inventory consisting of manufactured components, raw materials, and work-in-process, whether now owned or hereafter acquired' and it was accepted immediately. Thanks everyone for the help! The conforming goods standards are still in the credit agreement so our lender is happy.
Lucy Lam
•Perfect solution. You described the goods by type and let the security agreement handle the quality standards.
Glad it worked out! This thread should help other people avoid the same mistake.
Join the conversation
StarSeeker
This thread convinced me to double-check all our UCC filings. Found two that expire next year that I had wrong dates for. Decided to try that Certana.ai tool mentioned earlier and holy cow - uploaded our UCC documents and it instantly caught three potential debtor name mismatches I never noticed. Already fixed two continuation deadlines I had calculated wrong.
StarSeeker
•Yeah it cross-checks everything - debtor names against articles of incorporation, collateral descriptions, filing numbers. Really thorough compared to doing it manually.
Malik Davis
•Might have to check that out myself. These manual reviews are killing me and clearly I'm missing stuff.
Paolo Conti
Bottom line - file your new UCC-1 today, not tomorrow. Every day you wait increases the risk that another creditor could file and take priority over you. Then work with your attorney and lender to minimize any fallout from the lapse. Most importantly, put systems in place so this never happens again.
Smart move. And honestly the fact that you caught it only 3 days late shows you're at least paying attention. I've seen lapses go unnoticed for months.
Paolo Conti
•True, 3 days is manageable. The real disasters happen when people don't realize for weeks or months that their security interests have lapsed.
Join the conversation
One more thing to consider - make sure your purchase agreement actually creates buyer status under UCC vs just an option to buy. There's a technical difference between contracting to buy (which makes you a buyer) vs having the right to buy (which doesn't until exercised).
Ravi Gupta
•We definitely exercised the option and signed a purchase agreement. So we should be buyers under the UCC definition.
NebulaNinja
•Then the finance company is just being difficult. You might want to get your lawyer to send them a demand letter citing UCC 1-201(b)(9).
Update us on how this resolves! These UCC buyer definition disputes are becoming more common as equipment financing gets more complex. Would be helpful to know what finally worked for you.
Ravi Gupta
•Will do. Planning to have our attorney send a formal demand letter this week referencing the specific UCC sections mentioned here.
Good luck! The UCC buyer definition should be on your side if you have a proper purchase agreement.
Join the conversation
Dylan Wright
Quick follow up question - when you refile after a rejection like this, do you need to worry about the gap in perfection timing? Or does the original filing date still count if you refile within a reasonable time?
Sean O'Brien
•That's what I was worried about. Going to get the corrected version filed today to minimize the gap.
NebulaKnight
•depends on your state too - some have specific rules about relation back for corrected filings but don't count on it
Update: Got the refile accepted this morning! Changed the collateral description to specifically mention 'commercial food service equipment for restaurant business operations' and made sure the entity type was correctly selected as LLC. Thanks for all the suggestions - especially the tip about being more specific with the business context.
Zara Shah
•Great news! The specificity in collateral descriptions really does make a difference with these automated systems.
Congrats on getting it through. Still think the system shouldn't have rejected it in the first place, but at least you got it sorted quickly.
Tristan Carpenter
One thing that might help - try searching with just the first few words of the business name. Sometimes the database truncates longer names or has character limits that cause exact matches to fail.
0 coins
Ruby Blake
•Good suggestion. I'll try searching just 'Atlanta Medical Equipment' and see what comes up.
0 coins
Amaya Watson
•Also try without 'LLC' entirely. Some filers drop the entity designation.
0 coins
Grant Vikers
Just to add another perspective - make sure you're checking the actual UCC-3 continuation statements to see if they reference the original filing numbers correctly. I've seen cases where the continuation was filed but didn't properly reference the original UCC-1, making it ineffective.
0 coins
Levi Parker
•How does that work exactly? Do you upload both the original and continuation documents?
0 coins
Savannah Weiner
•Yeah, you can upload multiple documents and it cross-checks all the filing numbers, debtor names, and references to make sure everything aligns properly. Pretty handy for complex filing chains.
0 coins