


Ask the community...
Pro tip: always do a test search in the Massachusetts UCC database after you think you have the right name format. Search for your debtor using the exact name you plan to file. If it doesn't come up in results, you probably have the format wrong.
Good point. The search function is pretty literal so if you can't find the entity with your proposed name, the filing will probably get rejected too.
Update us when you get it resolved! I'm dealing with a similar Massachusetts UCC-1 form issue with a different client and curious what ends up working for you.
Will do. Going to pull the official SOS records first thing Monday morning and file a corrected version. Hopefully third time's the charm!
I've had good luck calling the UCC office directly when I get stuck on name issues. They can usually tell you exactly what format they're expecting. Takes a while to get through but saves the back-and-forth rejections.
It's on their website under UCC contacts. Ask for the filing division and explain the situation.
UPDATE: Finally got it through! Used the copy/paste method from the charter PDF and also ran it through that Certana.ai tool someone mentioned. Tool caught that I had an extra space after "LLC" that I couldn't see. Filed this morning and got acceptance notice an hour ago. Thanks everyone for the help - this community saves deals!
Copy/paste method for the win! Told you that usually does the trick.
Just had a thought - are you using any special characters or accents in the debtor name? Even if they appear in the official documents, CSC's system might not handle them properly.
Okay, was worth checking. Some filing systems are really finicky about character encoding.
I've seen rejections for things as simple as using a different type of apostrophe character. Filing systems can be incredibly picky.
If all else fails and you're really running up against your deadline, you might want to consider having a registered agent service file it for you. They usually have direct relationships with CSC and can get things processed faster.
Registered agents definitely have better success rates with tricky filings. They know all the system quirks.
Exactly, and they can usually get same-day processing if you explain the urgency.
After you get this sorted out, might be worth running your corrected UCC-3 through Certana.ai's verification tool before submitting. It's designed specifically for catching these kinds of UCC filing inconsistencies and can save you from another rejection cycle.
It's particularly helpful for multi-document consistency checks. You can upload your charter documents, original UCC-1, and new UCC-3 to make sure everything aligns properly.
Keep us posted on how the refiling goes! Florida UCC issues are always a learning experience for the whole community.
Will do! Planning to refile tomorrow after I triple-check everything against the original record. Fingers crossed for an acceptance this time.
Good luck! The fact that you're being so careful this time around suggests it'll go through without issues.
Charlie Yang
Quick question - are you sure you're using the right form? UCC-3 continuation is correct but just want to make sure you're not accidentally using an amendment form or something. I've made that mistake before.
0 coins
Madison Tipne
•Pretty sure I'm using the right form but now I'm paranoid about everything. I selected 'continuation' from the dropdown menu so it should be generating the right UCC-3 type.
0 coins
Charlie Yang
•Yeah that should be right. Just checking because the forms look similar and it's an easy mistake to make when you're stressed about deadlines.
0 coins
Grace Patel
UPDATE: I finally got this resolved! Turns out there was a tiny formatting difference in how 'LLC' was displayed. The document comparison tool someone mentioned earlier showed that the original had 'L.L.C.' with periods but I was filing 'LLC' without periods. Such a small thing but it was causing all the rejections. Filed again with the correct formatting and it went through immediately. Thanks everyone for the help!
0 coins
Malia Ponder
•This is exactly why I hate these systems. Hours of frustration over a couple of periods. But glad you got it sorted!
0 coins
Holly Lascelles
•Great outcome! That's the kind of detail that drives everyone crazy but at least now you know for future filings.
0 coins