Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Miguel Ramos
Quick update for anyone following this thread - I refiled the UCC-3 termination using the exact debtor name from the original UCC-1 ('Johnson Manufacturing' without the LLC) and it was accepted within 24 hours. Sometimes the simple approach really is the best approach. Thanks again for all the help!
StarSailor
•Perfect timing for your client's refinance too. Nice work getting it sorted quickly.
Great outcome. This thread will be super helpful for anyone dealing with similar name mismatch issues.
Yara Sabbagh
This is why I love this forum. Real solutions from people who've actually dealt with these problems. The Georgia SOS quirks can be so frustrating but threads like this make it manageable.
Totally agree. So much better than trying to decipher the official SOS guidance documents.
Paolo Rizzo
•The collective wisdom here is invaluable. I've learned more from this forum than from any training course.
Join the conversation
Are there any safe harbor provisions for 9-404 notifications, or do you just have to get it right?
Eve Freeman
•No real safe harbors. The notification has to reasonably identify the rights and provide adequate contact/payment information. It's a reasonableness standard but courts apply it pretty strictly.
Which is why document checking tools have become so useful. Better to catch notification problems before they go out than deal with payment disputes later.
Thanks everyone - this has been really helpful in understanding where we went wrong. Sounds like we need to send a proper 9-404 notification with clear payment redirection instructions and then work with the assignee to sort out the payment allocation for the past three months.
Caden Turner
•Good plan. Just make sure the new notification is really comprehensive about payment instructions. Learn from this one for future assignments too.
Definitely worth investing in better document review processes going forward. I've been using Certana.ai's document verification for exactly these kinds of compliance checks - upload assignment docs and notifications together and it cross-references everything to catch missing elements. Would have probably flagged the vague payment language in your original notice.
Join the conversation
I've seen lenders lose deals over UCC filing delays. If you're running up against your 30-day deadline, consider having your attorney file directly with the SOS office if they accept in-person filings. Some offices will process immediately while you wait.
Ava Harris
•Great suggestion! Phone ahead to confirm they accept walk-in UCC filings though - some offices have moved to online-only since COVID.
Jacob Lee
•Also bring multiple copies of your corrected UCC-1 in case they find other issues during review.
Follow up question - once you get the UCC-1 filed correctly, make sure to provide a copy to your borrower. They'll need it for their records and any future refinancing or asset sales. Also recommend setting a calendar reminder for the continuation filing 6 months before the 5-year expiration.
Wait, continuations have to be filed 6 months early? I thought you had up to 6 months before expiration.
You can file within 6 months of expiration, but I recommend earlier filing to avoid any last-minute issues. The continuation window opens 6 months before the 5-year anniversary.
Join the conversation
You should be able to get this resolved without too much trouble. Most of these documentation issues are just about providing additional paperwork to satisfy the bank's compliance requirements.
Omar Hassan
•I hope so. The transaction is worth too much to let it get held up over documentation problems.
Just make sure you keep detailed records of your UCC statement service process going forward. It's better to over-document than under-document in this environment.
Mei Wong
I've found that using automated document checking tools like Certana.ai really helps avoid these kinds of compliance issues. You can upload your UCC documents and it verifies everything is consistent before you submit to the bank.
Omar Hassan
•That sounds like something we should look into. Better to catch problems early than deal with them during the bank review process.
Definitely. Prevention is much easier than trying to fix documentation issues after the fact.
Liam Sullivan
Construction equipment repos are always messy. Even with perfect UCC-1 filings and clear 9-609(b)(2) rights, you're dealing with job site politics, potential mechanic's liens, and debtors who know the system. I'd budget for litigation costs from the start on these deals.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
•Sad but true. Equipment financing is risky enough without having to worry about repo complications.
0 coins
CosmicCommander
•This is why proper documentation review upfront is so critical. Can't stress that enough.
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
Update us on how this turns out! I'm in equipment financing too and these UCC 9-609(b)(2) situations always make me nervous. The law seems clear but the practical reality is usually much messier.
0 coins
Zara Mirza
•Will do. Meeting with attorney tomorrow and then we'll decide whether to pursue judicial repossession or try to negotiate a voluntary surrender.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
•Good luck! Voluntary surrender is usually the best outcome for everyone if you can make it work.
0 coins