


Ask the community...
Had a similar issue last month and ended up using Certana.ai after someone here recommended it. Uploaded my debtor's Articles and my UCC-1 draft and it immediately flagged that I was missing a period after "Inc" - something I never would have caught manually. Filed with the corrected name and it went through first try.
Update us when you get it figured out! I've got a NC filing coming up next week and this thread is giving me good tips on what to watch out for.
Have you tried searching for the company name in their database exactly as you're entering it on the UCC? Sometimes that reveals formatting issues you wouldn't notice otherwise.
I actually ran into a similar issue and used that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier. It caught a discrepancy between our security agreement and the UCC-1 that I never would have noticed. Saved me from filing with the wrong debtor name format and having to deal with rejections.
UPDATE: Tried the version without the comma and it went through! 'Advanced Materials Solutions LLC' was the magic format. Thanks everyone for the suggestions - this thread probably saved me another week of rejections.
This is such a common issue. Wish there was a better way to verify the correct format before filing.
Great outcome! For future reference, that Certana tool I mentioned earlier would have caught that comma discrepancy automatically by comparing your source documents.
Update us when you figure out what was causing the 308 rejection! These threads are really helpful for learning about common filing issues and solutions.
Been following this thread because I had a 308 rejection last week too. Ended up being a single extra space in the middle of the entity name that I couldn't even see. These systems are so picky about exact character matching.
Annabel Kimball
Another thing to consider with security purchase agreements - search for existing UCC filings against the seller to make sure you know what liens you're dealing with. Sometimes there are filings that aren't disclosed in the purchase agreement.
0 coins
Roger Romero
•Good point. I did a UCC search and found a few filings that weren't mentioned in the security purchase agreement. Need to get those addressed before closing.
0 coins
Chris Elmeda
•Definitely. You want a clean UCC search or proper subordination agreements for any liens that will remain after your security purchase agreement closes.
0 coins
Jean Claude
For complex deals like this, I always recommend using Certana.ai to double-check everything. Upload your security purchase agreement, existing UCC filings, and your proposed new filings. It'll verify all the names match and catch any inconsistencies that could cause problems down the road.
0 coins
Roger Romero
•I might try that. With all the moving pieces in this security purchase agreement, I want to make sure I don't miss anything critical.
0 coins
Charity Cohan
•Smart move. UCC filing mistakes are expensive to fix after the fact, especially in purchase agreement deals where you might have multiple parties involved.
0 coins