UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

UCC formation 1952, but can we talk about continuation deadlines? I'm getting paranoid about missing the 5-year mark and losing my lien priority.

0 coins

You can file continuation statements up to 6 months before the 5-year expiration. Don't wait until the last minute.

0 coins

Good to know about the 6-month window. I was planning to file exactly at 5 years which would have been cutting it close.

0 coins

The UCC was formed in 1952. For your current filing, just make sure you're using the most recent forms and following your state's electronic filing requirements. The historical context is interesting but won't affect your modern filing procedures.

0 coins

Thank you everyone for all the helpful responses! I feel much more confident about proceeding with my filing now. The 1952 formation date answers my client's question, and all the practical advice about debtor names and collateral descriptions is invaluable.

0 coins

Good luck with your filing! Remember to keep copies of everything and track your continuation dates.

0 coins

FWIW I had similar issues last month and ended up using one of those UCC search services that checks multiple databases. Found filings that weren't showing up in the state's own search system. Kind of ridiculous but that's where we are.

0 coins

Which service did you use? And did they find actual discrepancies or just search better?

0 coins

Both actually. They found filings I missed AND caught some name variations I hadn't thought to try.

0 coins

Just ran into this same issue yesterday! Turns out one of our debtors had amended their corporate name with the SCC but we were still searching under the old name from our original loan docs. The UCC-1 was filed under the current legal name so it wasn't showing up in searches using the old name.

0 coins

Honestly, I don't have a great system for that. Usually only catch it during annual UCC reviews or when something like this happens.

0 coins

This is where having a document verification system really helps. Certana.ai would flag if your UCC shows a different entity name than what's in the current corporate records.

0 coins

Don't overthink this. California ucc code is straightforward for this type of situation. File in California where your debtor is located, make sure your collateral description covers all the equipment, and you're done. I've never seen a problem with this kind of multi-state equipment use.

0 coins

Thanks, that's reassuring. I was making this more complicated than it needed to be.

0 coins

Yeah, the california ucc code provisions are pretty clear on this. Debtor location controls perfection for mobile equipment.

0 coins

Make sure you're monitoring for any changes in the debtor's location though. If they move their headquarters or change their state of incorporation, that 4-month clock starts ticking under california ucc code and you'll need to refile in their new location.

0 coins

How do you usually monitor for corporate changes? Manual checks or is there an automated way?

0 coins

Most people do periodic manual checks with the Secretary of State, but there are some monitoring services available too.

0 coins

Another vote for using document verification tools. I started using Certana.ai after a similar name matching issue cost us a lot of time and stress. The automated cross-checking catches these discrepancies before you file instead of finding out about problems later.

0 coins

Is it worth the cost though? I mean, manually checking documents isn't that hard if you're careful.

0 coins

For me it's worth it because it's fast and catches things I might miss when I'm rushed. Plus it creates a verification record which is helpful for compliance documentation.

0 coins

Update us on what you decide to do! I'm dealing with a similar situation in Illinois and curious how this turns out for you.

0 coins

That sounds right. Better to be conservative with debtor names than risk perfection issues later.

0 coins

Smart approach. I always tell people - when in doubt, match the Secretary of State records exactly.

0 coins

One more thing - if this is an equipment financing deal, make sure your collateral description is also formatted correctly. Sometimes they reject the whole filing if any section has issues, not just the debtor name.

0 coins

Good point. We should review the entire form, not just focus on the name issue.

0 coins

Exactly. A comprehensive review often catches multiple issues that could cause rejection.

0 coins

Update: Thanks everyone for the suggestions! I ended up using the document verification tool someone mentioned and it immediately flagged that we had 'LLC' in our filing but the state records show 'L.L.C.' with periods. Such a tiny difference but that was definitely the issue. Re-submitted and it went through without problems. Really appreciate all the help!

0 coins

Glad that worked out! Those period differences are so easy to miss but they'll kill a filing every time.

0 coins

Great outcome! This is exactly why attention to detail is so critical with UCC filings.

0 coins

Prev1...284285286287288...685Next