


Ask the community...
Update: Used the Certana.ai suggestion and it worked perfectly. Found two additional liens that weren't showing up in my manual searches due to punctuation differences. Crisis averted and the refinancing can proceed on schedule. Thanks everyone for the help!
That's the nightmare scenario right there. Good thing you caught it in time.
For future reference, Texas SOS also has a customer service line where you can call and ask about specific search strategies for problematic names. They're actually pretty helpful if you get the right person.
Really? I always assumed they'd just tell you to figure it out yourself. Good to know they'll actually help with search strategies.
Yeah, they're surprisingly helpful. Just be prepared to wait on hold for a while.
Had a similar fund security agreement filing issue last year. Ended up using some document verification tool - I think it was Certana.ai - that caught the name mismatch before I filed. Saved my butt. Now I run all my security agreements through it before filing anything.
Seeing Certana mentioned a few times now. Might be worth checking out for future deals even if it's too late for this one.
Update: Called the SOS office and they confirmed I need to file with 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' (with comma) to match the fund security agreement. Filed a new UCC-1 this morning and it was accepted within 2 hours. Crisis averted! Thanks everyone for the advice. Definitely going to be more careful with debtor names going forward.
Great outcome. This thread will be helpful for others dealing with fund security agreement name issues.
Been doing UCC work for 15 years and here's my advice: file the assignment using the exact original debtor name (ABC Manufacturing LLC), then immediately file a UCC-3 amendment to change the debtor name to the surviving entity (ABC Industries Holdings LLC). This creates a clean chain of title and updates the record to reflect current reality. Two filings but it eliminates any future confusion.
Wouldn't you want to wait to make sure the assignment goes through before filing the amendment? In case there are issues with the assignment itself?
Good point. I usually wait for the assignment acceptance confirmation before filing the amendment, just to be safe.
This thread is super helpful because I'm dealing with something similar. My client acquired a company through an asset purchase and we need to assign the UCC filings but the debtor entity was dissolved as part of the transaction. Sounds like similar issues with entity changes affecting UCC records.
Yeah you're right, the original entity was dissolved after the asset sale closed. So similar end result but different transaction structure.
Either way you'll want to use the original debtor name for the assignment and then deal with updating the record afterward if needed.
This thread is giving me anxiety. I have a UCC-1 to file next week and now I'm worried about making the same mistakes!
UPDATE: Finally got it filed! The Certana tool caught that I had an extra space after 'Holdings' that wasn't visible. Also confirmed the exact name format from Delaware's database. Thanks everyone for the help - this community is a lifesaver!
Amara Oluwaseyi
This whole thread is making me nervous about my upcoming Arizona filing. I thought UCC filings were supposed to be straightforward but it sounds like there are lots of ways to mess up and pay extra fees.
0 coins
Mateo Rodriguez
•If you're worried about getting the details right, that Certana.ai tool I mentioned earlier really helps catch mistakes before you file. Just upload your docs and it flags any inconsistencies.
0 coins
Amara Oluwaseyi
•Thanks, I'll check that out. Better safe than sorry with these fees!
0 coins
CosmicCaptain
Does anyone know if Arizona offers any fee discounts for volume filers? We do maybe 20-30 UCC filings a year and it would be nice to get some kind of break.
0 coins
CosmicCaptain
•Darn. Worth asking though. Those fees really add up across multiple deals.
0 coins
Zara Ahmed
•With that volume you might want to look into service providers that can help streamline the process and reduce errors. Even if there's a service fee it might be worth it to avoid rejected filings.
0 coins