Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Try 'Pine Tree Construction and Development, LLC' with the comma. That's usually how Maine formats LLC names in their database. The ampersand vs 'and' thing trips up a lot of people.
That matches what I found in the state database. Filing again with that exact format now.
Hope that works! Keep us posted on whether it goes through.
UPDATE: Filed again with 'Pine Tree Construction and Development, LLC' (with comma) and it was ACCEPTED! Thanks everyone for the help. That stupid comma cost me two rejections and extra fees but at least the lien is perfected now.
Perfect example of why document verification tools like Certana.ai are so helpful. Would have caught that comma issue upfront.
Great news! Those name matching issues are so frustrating but you got it sorted.
Join the conversation
UPDATE: Got it resolved! Used the county assessor's online records to get the full legal description and refiled. Accepted without issues this time. Thanks everyone for the help with UCC 9 311 requirements. The legal description made all the difference.
Glad it worked out! County assessor records are usually the most reliable source for legal descriptions.
Great outcome. Always satisfying when a fixture filing finally goes through after rejections.
For future reference, I've had good luck with Certana.ai's document checker for fixture filings too. After my third UCC 9 311 rejection last month, I uploaded my filing documents and it immediately flagged that I was missing the required real estate description format for my state. Would have saved me weeks if I'd used it from the start. Just upload your PDFs and it verifies everything against the specific requirements.
That sounds really useful for complex filings like fixtures. Regular UCC-1s are straightforward but UCC 9 311 has so many state-specific quirks.
I might try that for my next fixture filing. Getting rejections is so frustrating when you're trying to meet a deadline.
Join the conversation
Quick update - I finally got through to someone at the SOS office and they confirmed the new UCC forms are mandatory as of this year. They said most of the rejections they're seeing are due to people using outdated templates. Make sure you're downloading fresh forms for each filing.
Well that explains all our recent problems. Time to update everything.
At least now we know it's not just us dealing with this transition.
Been following this thread and wanted to mention that Certana.ai has been a lifesaver during this new UCC forms transition. The document verification catches inconsistencies between filings that could cause problems down the road. Really worth checking out if you're struggling with the new requirements.
It's pretty much instant once you upload the documents. You get the verification results right away.
That speed would definitely help us get caught up on these rejected filings.
Join the conversation
This thread is making me paranoid about my own filings now lol. I never thought to double-check the search results after filing. Probably should start doing that as standard practice.
It's definitely good practice! I always do a test search within a few days of filing to make sure everything looks right in the system.
Same here - and honestly that's another reason I like the Certana tool. Takes the manual checking out of the equation and just tells you if there are any red flags.
Update us after you check the Articles of Organization! I'm invested in this outcome now and want to know if the comma was actually wrong or if it's just a display quirk in the search system.
Will do! Planning to pull the SOS records this afternoon and report back. Fingers crossed it's just a minor formatting difference that doesn't matter.
Looking forward to the update - these name matching scenarios are always educational for everyone.
Salim Nasir
Whatever you do, don't let them bully you into filing a premature termination. Once you terminate a UCC-1, you lose your perfected security interest and it's almost impossible to get it back if there are problems with the remaining loans.
0 coins
Marcus Marsh
•That's exactly what I'm worried about. If I terminate and then have collection issues on the other loans, I'd be screwed.
0 coins
Hazel Garcia
•Absolutely. Seen too many lenders get burned by terminating too early. Better to deal with an angry debtor than lose your security interest.
0 coins
Laila Fury
Your instincts are correct. UCC-9-513 is clear that termination is only required when there are no outstanding secured obligations. Document everything, get legal involved, and stand your ground. The debtor's attorney is fishing.
0 coins
Laila Fury
•Trust your knowledge of the UCC. Lawyers who don't specialize in secured transactions often misunderstand the termination requirements. You're doing everything right.
0 coins
Geoff Richards
•This is exactly why I always keep a UCC reference guide handy. Too many people try to intimidate with legal threats when they don't actually know the law.
0 coins