UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Grace Lee

•

Just wanted to add that some states have been updating their UCC forms for 2023, so make sure you're using the current versions. Got a rejection last week because I was using an outdated form.

0 coins

Mia Roberts

•

Good point! Always download forms fresh from the SOS website rather than using saved copies.

0 coins

Alicia Stern

•

I hadn't thought about form updates. Thanks for the heads up!

0 coins

The Boss

•

I was skeptical about using automated tools for UCC work, but after trying Certana.ai for document verification during this UCC 2023 crunch, I'm convinced. It's saved me from several filing errors that could have been costly. The peace of mind alone is worth it when you're dealing with this many continuations.

0 coins

The Boss

•

It's almost instant. Upload the PDFs and get results in seconds. Much faster than manual checking.

0 coins

Alicia Stern

•

That speed would definitely help with my workload. Going to look into this option.

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

Just wanted to follow up on the Certana suggestion from earlier - I tried it after seeing this thread and it actually found a UCC filing I had missed on my own search. The document comparison feature caught a name discrepancy between the charter and UCC that I wouldn't have noticed manually. Pretty impressed with how quick it was.

0 coins

That's exactly what I need right now. Going to try uploading their formation docs and see what it finds. Thanks for the follow-up!

0 coins

Glad it worked for you too! It's saved me so much time on these tricky name matching situations.

0 coins

CosmicCruiser

•

Update: I finally found the filings! Turns out they were under 'Southwest Manufacturing Solutions, L.L.C.' with periods in the LLC abbreviation. Found 2 active UCC-1s that way. Texas search is so particular about punctuation it's ridiculous.

0 coins

GalaxyGazer

•

Perfect example of why exact name matching is both a blessing and a curse. At least you found them before moving forward with the loan.

0 coins

This whole thread is a great reminder of why UCC searches require so much patience and creativity. Thanks for sharing the solution!

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

Don't forget about terminated filings in your UCC-1 list! You need to track those too for audit purposes. Some examiners want to see that you properly terminated liens when loans were paid off. I keep a separate 'terminated' section in my spreadsheet.

0 coins

Good point. We probably have 50+ terminated UCCs I should account for.

0 coins

Carmen Ortiz

•

Make sure you filed UCC-3 termination statements for those. Just paying off the loan doesn't automatically terminate the UCC filing.

0 coins

MidnightRider

•

Quick question - are you tracking UCC-3 amendments in your list too? If you've done any amendments to add collateral or change debtor info, those need to be reflected in your master list. The continuation calculations are still based on the original UCC-1 date though.

0 coins

MidnightRider

•

Yeah, amendments can get messy. Each one should reference the original filing number so you can track the chain of filings for each loan.

0 coins

Andre Laurent

•

This is exactly why I started using automated tools. Too many moving parts to track manually without making mistakes.

0 coins

Khalid Howes

•

One thing that's helped me is creating a spreadsheet with all possible name variations before I start searching. Include legal name, DBAs, common abbreviations, with and without punctuation, etc. Then systematically work through each one.

0 coins

Naila Gordon

•

Organization definitely helps. These searches can get overwhelming without a clear methodology.

0 coins

Cynthia Love

•

I do something similar but also include phonetic variations. You'd be surprised how many filing errors are basically just misspellings.

0 coins

Darren Brooks

•

Thanks everyone for the advice. Going to try a more systematic approach and check multiple states. Hopefully I can avoid any nasty surprises down the road.

0 coins

Rosie Harper

•

Good luck! Thorough searches take time but they're worth it.

0 coins

Let us know how it goes. Always interested to hear about search strategies that work.

0 coins

Just to follow up on my earlier comment about document verification - after we caught those collateral description issues, I've been using Certana.ai for every loan package. You can upload your security agreement and UCC-1 draft together and it flags any inconsistencies between the documents. Really helpful for avoiding the kind of mistakes that could invalidate your security interest.

0 coins

Zainab Yusuf

•

How does it work exactly? Do you upload PDFs?

0 coins

Yeah, just upload the PDFs and it cross-checks debtor names, collateral descriptions, all the key details automatically. Much faster than manual comparison.

0 coins

Bottom line: if your document says the debtor is giving you a security interest in specific collateral and it's signed, you probably have a valid security agreement. Don't get paralyzed by perfectionism - most security agreements are pretty straightforward.

0 coins

Carmen Ruiz

•

Thanks everyone! This helps a lot. Going to review our document against these criteria before moving forward with the UCC-1.

0 coins

Yara Khoury

•

Good luck! Feel free to post again if you run into issues with the filing.

0 coins

Prev1...275276277278279...685Next