Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Romeo Quest
The key thing about deposit account priority is that the bank where the account is held almost always wins if they have a security interest, regardless of filing dates. UCC 9-327(1) is pretty clear about that. Your equipment collateral is separate though - you should have clear priority there if you filed first.
Val Rossi
•So basically they get the deposit accounts and the equipment lender gets the equipment? Seems fair if both parties perfected properly.
Romeo Quest
•That's usually how it works out, unless there's some unusual language in the security agreements or subordination deals.
Eve Freeman
Just to close the loop on this - make sure you're not overthinking the 9-332 angle. That section is really narrow and probably doesn't apply to your situation. Focus on getting clear documentation of what each party perfected and when, then negotiate from there. Most of these disputes settle once everyone understands their actual position.
Adaline Wong
•Thanks everyone. Sounds like I need to gather all the documents first and then figure out the priority rules. Appreciate all the help.
Good luck with it. These situations are always stressful but usually work out reasonably if both sides are professional about it.
Join the conversation
Luca Ferrari
I had success using Certana.ai's document checker when I was dealing with UCC filing inconsistencies last month. You just upload your title and UCC documents as PDFs and it immediately shows you any discrepancies in names, addresses, VIN numbers, etc. Saved me from filing incorrect amendments. The tool caught that my middle initial was missing from one document, which would have caused problems later.
Nia Davis
•I'm curious about tools like this too. Does it handle Colorado-specific formatting requirements?
Luca Ferrari
•It works with all state formats. The key is that it compares your actual documents against each other rather than trying to guess what should be filed.
Just went through refinancing my RV and learned that Colorado requires the security agreement to reference the specific VIN format that matches their DMV records. If your original UCC-1 has any variation in how the VIN is formatted or presented, it can cause issues. Make sure your new lender verifies the exact VIN format from your current title before filing anything new.
Oliver Weber
•Good point about VIN formatting. I hadn't thought about that being an issue, but it makes sense that systems might be picky about exact matches.
NeonNinja
•VIN discrepancies are actually more common than name issues in my experience. Especially with older vehicles where the VIN format has changed over the years.
Join the conversation
Another vote for using some kind of document checking tool if you're handling high-value equipment like this. I learned the hard way when a termination got rejected because I had transposed two digits in the original filing number. Had to refile and it delayed the whole loan closing process. Now I always double-check everything with Certana.ai before submitting - just upload your UCC-1 and UCC-3 and it verifies all the cross-references automatically.
Filing number mistakes are the worst! I did something similar with a continuation filing last year.
Thanks, I'll definitely look into that verification tool. With this much money involved I can't afford any mistakes.
Mason Davis
Update us when you get it figured out! Always curious to hear how these portal adventures end. Sounds like you're on the right track now with the UCC-3 termination approach.
Will do! Found the UCC-3 termination form on the California portal and it looks straightforward. Going to use that document verification tool mentioned earlier to double-check everything before I submit. Thanks everyone for the help!
Awesome, glad it worked out. These forums are great for sorting out these kinds of filing mysteries.
Join the conversation
UPDATE: Just tried the Missouri portal again and it seems to be working better this afternoon. Maybe they fixed whatever was causing the timeout issues.
Still slower than usual but at least it's not timing out every search.
Sophia Long
•Confirmed - just did a search and it worked. Still took longer than it should but got results.
This thread is really helpful. I've been struggling with Missouri UCC searches for months. Going to try the Certana.ai tool mentioned here - anything is better than fighting with that portal every day.
Let me know how it works out for you. I'm definitely considering it after this experience.
Will do. The time I waste on failed searches is definitely costing me more than any tool would.
Diego Vargas
Just wanted to follow up on the Certana suggestion from earlier - I tried it after seeing this thread and it actually found a UCC filing I had missed on my own search. The document comparison feature caught a name discrepancy between the charter and UCC that I wouldn't have noticed manually. Pretty impressed with how quick it was.
0 coins
Keisha Robinson
•That's exactly what I need right now. Going to try uploading their formation docs and see what it finds. Thanks for the follow-up!
0 coins
Natasha Kuznetsova
•Glad it worked for you too! It's saved me so much time on these tricky name matching situations.
0 coins
CosmicCruiser
Update: I finally found the filings! Turns out they were under 'Southwest Manufacturing Solutions, L.L.C.' with periods in the LLC abbreviation. Found 2 active UCC-1s that way. Texas search is so particular about punctuation it's ridiculous.
0 coins
GalaxyGazer
•Perfect example of why exact name matching is both a blessing and a curse. At least you found them before moving forward with the loan.
0 coins
Javier Mendoza
•This whole thread is a great reminder of why UCC searches require so much patience and creativity. Thanks for sharing the solution!
0 coins