Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Quick question - if the UCC search shows active filings, does that automatically kill the deal? Or are there ways to work around existing security interests?
Not necessarily a deal killer. You can negotiate with the seller to pay off the secured debt, get a release from the lender, or adjust the purchase price. The key is knowing about it before closing so you can address it properly.
Sometimes the equipment subject to UCC liens isn't even essential to your intended use of the property. You might negotiate to exclude those items from the sale entirely.
I just went through this process last month for a warehouse purchase. Found three UCC-1 filings against forklifts and racking systems. Two had been terminated properly with UCC-3 filings, but one was still active. Seller had to provide a satisfaction letter from the lender before we could close. Definitely worth the extra week of due diligence to avoid future headaches.
How long did it take the seller to get the satisfaction letter? I'm worried about delays affecting my closing timeline.
About 10 business days. The lender was pretty responsive once they confirmed the debt had been paid off. Just make sure to request termination documents well before your closing date.
Join the conversation
UCC formation 1952, but can we talk about continuation deadlines? I'm getting paranoid about missing the 5-year mark and losing my lien priority.
You can file continuation statements up to 6 months before the 5-year expiration. Don't wait until the last minute.
Good to know about the 6-month window. I was planning to file exactly at 5 years which would have been cutting it close.
Amina Diop
The UCC was formed in 1952. For your current filing, just make sure you're using the most recent forms and following your state's electronic filing requirements. The historical context is interesting but won't affect your modern filing procedures.
Mei Zhang
•Thank you everyone for all the helpful responses! I feel much more confident about proceeding with my filing now. The 1952 formation date answers my client's question, and all the practical advice about debtor names and collateral descriptions is invaluable.
Good luck with your filing! Remember to keep copies of everything and track your continuation dates.
Join the conversation
UCC filer 6269 is fixable but you need to be methodical. Print out both the original UCC-1 and your rejected UCC-3, then compare every single character in the debtor name field. Don't trust copy and paste - actually look at each letter.
Good advice. I'll do a character-by-character comparison before refiling.
Liam Mendez
•Character comparison is tedious but necessary. I missed a period after "Inc" once and it took me forever to spot it manually.
Update: Found the problem! The original UCC-1 had our company name as "ABC Manufacturing LLC" but I filed the termination as "ABC Manufacturing, LLC" with a comma. Refiled without the comma and it went through immediately. Thanks for all the help troubleshooting UCC filer 6269!
Chloe Martin
•Perfect example of why document verification tools are worth it. Would have caught that comma difference instantly.
Congrats on getting it resolved! Now you know to be extra careful about punctuation on future UCC filings.
Join the conversation
Just went through something similar and ended up using Certana.ai to map out all our collateral descriptions across multiple UCC filings. Found several gaps we didn't even know existed. Really eye-opening to see everything laid out visually.
How long did that process take? We've got hundreds of UCC filings and the thought of reviewing them all manually is terrifying.
That's the beauty of it - just bulk upload your PDFs and the system does the analysis automatically. Took maybe an hour to upload everything and then got results immediately.
Bottom line - you're probably fine on the proceeds issue but definitely should consider broadening your collateral description for future deals. This type of classification problem only gets worse as businesses evolve and change their operations.
Yeah that's kind of where I'm landing too. Probably covered under current filing but need to be more comprehensive going forward.
Exactly - learn from this one and adjust your standard forms. Most of these problems are preventable with better initial documentation.
Aisha Mahmood
One trick I use is to search for just the first word of the company name, then scan through all the results. Takes longer but catches things you might miss with more specific searches.
0 coins
Ethan Moore
•That's a good idea for thorough searches. Time consuming but comprehensive.
0 coins
Yuki Kobayashi
•I do something similar - search by just the last name if it's a person, or the main business name without entity type.
0 coins
Carmen Vega
Just to double-check - you're searching in the right state, right? I once spent an hour searching Idaho when the business was actually incorporated in Delaware.
0 coins
Amina Bah
•Ha! Yes, definitely Idaho. The business operates here and that's where we filed our UCC-1.
0 coins
QuantumQuester
•Had to ask - we've all been there at some point!
0 coins