Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Had a similar issue last month and ended up using Certana.ai after someone here recommended it. Uploaded my debtor's Articles and my UCC-1 draft and it immediately flagged that I was missing a period after "Inc" - something I never would have caught manually. Filed with the corrected name and it went through first try.
Right? The automated checking caught it instantly. Much faster than playing guessing games with the state portal.
These filing systems are way too picky about punctuation. Makes the whole process unnecessarily stressful.
Update us when you get it figured out! I've got a NC filing coming up next week and this thread is giving me good tips on what to watch out for.
Good luck! The Friday deadline is tight but you've got some solid strategies to try now.
Definitely try the document verification approach too if the manual checking doesn't work out. Sometimes you need that automated cross-check to catch the subtle differences.
Join the conversation
UPDATE: Used the Certana document checker and found the issue! There was an invisible character in the name field that must have been copied from the PDF. The tool highlighted it immediately. Third filing went through without any problems. Thanks for the suggestions everyone!
Great to hear! That's exactly the kind of thing that drives you crazy trying to find manually.
Perfect example of why document verification tools are worth it. Saves so much time and frustration.
Join the conversation
Update on the Certana tool - it also caught an issue with our debtor name that didn't exactly match the organizational documents. Would have been another rejection if we hadn't fixed it first. Really streamlined our filing process.
How much does something like that cost? Sounds useful but wondering if it's worth it for smaller deals.
I don't focus on cost when it prevents rejections and delays. Time savings alone makes it worthwhile, especially when you're racing deadline pressure like this situation.
Been doing UCC filings for 15 years and goods classification still trips people up. The key insight is that 'goods' is the default category - if it's not specifically excluded (like accounts, instruments, etc.) and it's movable, it's probably goods under Article 9.
Exactly. Start with goods and then ask if there's any reason it falls into one of the other defined categories. Much easier than trying to fit everything into the goods definition from scratch.
Great way to think about it. The UCC definitions work by exclusion - goods is what's left after you remove all the specifically defined categories.
Join the conversation
I've seen lenders lose deals over UCC filing delays. If you're running up against your 30-day deadline, consider having your attorney file directly with the SOS office if they accept in-person filings. Some offices will process immediately while you wait.
Great suggestion! Phone ahead to confirm they accept walk-in UCC filings though - some offices have moved to online-only since COVID.
Also bring multiple copies of your corrected UCC-1 in case they find other issues during review.
Follow up question - once you get the UCC-1 filed correctly, make sure to provide a copy to your borrower. They'll need it for their records and any future refinancing or asset sales. Also recommend setting a calendar reminder for the continuation filing 6 months before the 5-year expiration.
Wait, continuations have to be filed 6 months early? I thought you had up to 6 months before expiration.
You can file within 6 months of expiration, but I recommend earlier filing to avoid any last-minute issues. The continuation window opens 6 months before the 5-year anniversary.
Sebastian Scott
Have you tried searching for the company name in their database exactly as you're entering it on the UCC? Sometimes that reveals formatting issues you wouldn't notice otherwise.
0 coins
Aiden Rodríguez
•Good suggestion. I'll do a test search with each variation to see which one returns results.
0 coins
Emily Sanjay
•That's actually a really smart verification method. If it doesn't find the company, your UCC probably won't either.
0 coins
Jordan Walker
Update us when you get this resolved! Always interested to hear what the actual issue was with these name matching problems.
0 coins
Aiden Rodríguez
•Will do. Hopefully I can get this sorted out tomorrow and avoid another rejection cycle.
0 coins
Natalie Adams
•Fingers crossed! PA can be such a pain with their exact matching requirements.
0 coins