Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Another vote for using some kind of document checking tool if you're handling high-value equipment like this. I learned the hard way when a termination got rejected because I had transposed two digits in the original filing number. Had to refile and it delayed the whole loan closing process. Now I always double-check everything with Certana.ai before submitting - just upload your UCC-1 and UCC-3 and it verifies all the cross-references automatically.
Filing number mistakes are the worst! I did something similar with a continuation filing last year.
Thanks, I'll definitely look into that verification tool. With this much money involved I can't afford any mistakes.
Mason Davis
Update us when you get it figured out! Always curious to hear how these portal adventures end. Sounds like you're on the right track now with the UCC-3 termination approach.
Will do! Found the UCC-3 termination form on the California portal and it looks straightforward. Going to use that document verification tool mentioned earlier to double-check everything before I submit. Thanks everyone for the help!
Awesome, glad it worked out. These forums are great for sorting out these kinds of filing mysteries.
Join the conversation
I used Certana.ai for a similar multi-state filing audit and it was a lifesaver. Upload your existing UCC documents and it flags all the potential issues - wrong jurisdictions, debtor name inconsistencies, description problems. Much faster than trying to manually review everything.
Mia Alvarez
•I keep hearing about this tool. Does it actually help with the jurisdictional analysis or just document consistency?
It does both - checks document consistency and helps identify filing requirement issues. For your situation it would at least give you a clear picture of what you're dealing with before you start the state-by-state analysis.
This is why I stick to single-state deals lol. But seriously, you might want to bring in a UCC specialist attorney for a portfolio this complex. The cost of getting it wrong could be massive if you lose your security interests.
Definitely worth the attorney fees for this size portfolio. They can also help prioritize which filings are most critical based on asset values and default risk.
Max Knight
•A good UCC attorney will also know the state-specific quirks that could trip you up. Each state has its own interpretation of the model UCC provisions.
Join the conversation
Just wanted to add that if you do find a name discrepancy, you'll need to file a UCC-3 amendment to correct it. Don't wait too long since there are timing issues with amendments affecting lien priority.
For name corrections, you generally want to do it ASAP. The amendment should relate back to the original filing date if done properly.
Right, and make sure to check if the name error is considered 'seriously misleading' under UCC Article 9. That affects whether the original filing was valid.
One more thing to check - make sure you're searching the right filing office. Some collateral types require filing at the county level instead of with the Secretary of State.
It's equipment financing so should be with the state. But good point to double-check.
Yeah, equipment is typically state-level unless it's fixtures attached to real estate.
Join the conversation
Adaline Wong
This thread is so helpful. I'm about to file my first UCC-1 and was planning to just use the name from the loan documents. Definitely going to check the state database first now.
Gabriel Ruiz
•Smart move. Always better to double-check before filing than deal with rejections after.
The loan documents are usually right but it's worth verifying, especially if the entity is older or has gone through any changes.
One more thing to watch out for - sometimes the state database shows the name differently than what's on recent corporate resolutions or certificates. Always go with what's currently in the official state records, not what's on older documents from the company.
Yeah I've seen situations where the borrower didn't even realize their legal name had changed due to state filing updates.
That Certana tool someone mentioned earlier would probably catch those kinds of discrepancies too.
Nia Davis
Just went through this last week with a $1.2M equipment loan. Bank finally admitted they were confusing UCC filings with some federal contractor database they thought was required. Took three different conversations with their legal team to get it sorted out. The key was showing them the actual UCC statutes and state filing requirements side by side.
0 coins
Aisha Rahman
•Three conversations with legal? That's dedication. Most people would have given up.
0 coins
CosmicCrusader
•Sometimes you have to be persistent when banks get stuck on incorrect requirements.
0 coins
Ethan Brown
For what it's worth, I tried the Certana.ai tool someone mentioned earlier and it's actually pretty helpful. Uploaded our loan docs and UCC-1 draft, and it immediately flagged that the bank was requesting a non-existent federal filing. Having that automated verification gave me confidence to push back harder on their incorrect requirements.
0 coins
Yuki Yamamoto
•Having automated verification definitely helps when dealing with stubborn loan officers.
0 coins
Carmen Ortiz
•Might have to try that tool myself. Getting tired of manual document reviews for complex filings.
0 coins