


Ask the community...
I ran into a similar UCC 9-316 issue last year and ended up using one of those document verification services to make sure my refiling was done correctly. There are tools that can cross-check your original filing against the new state requirements to catch potential issues before they become problems. Worth looking into if you want to be extra careful with the Tennessee filing.
Which service did you use? I want to make sure this Tennessee filing is bulletproof since I already messed up the timing.
I used Certana.ai - you just upload your documents and it flags any inconsistencies or potential issues. Really helped catch things I would have missed.
UCC 9-316 is one of those provisions that seems simple until you actually have to deal with it. Four months sounds like plenty of time until you realize you weren't even tracking the debtor's entity status. File in Tennessee this week and put systems in place to prevent this from happening again on future deals.
One thing to watch out for - make sure your new lender is searching correctly. We had a situation where the new bank was doing a sloppy UCC search and missing terminated liens. They kept saying there were active filings when there weren't. Sometimes the problem is on their end, not yours.
Update us when you get this resolved! These california ucc financing lien situations are always learning experiences for the rest of us dealing with equipment financing.
One more tip for the original poster - keep a copy of exactly what you file. If you ever need to do an amendment or continuation, you'll want to reference the exact language from your original UCC-1.
To wrap this up - your collateral description should be clear, accurate, and sufficient to give notice. Don't overthink the 'contract definition' aspect. You're describing collateral, not drafting the contract itself. For construction equipment, use language that reasonably identifies the equipment without being overly broad or unnecessarily specific.
Thank you everyone - this has been incredibly helpful. I feel much more confident about moving forward with the filing now.
Great thread - I learned a lot too. The Certana.ai suggestion is definitely worth looking into for complex filings.
Update us on how this turns out! I'm curious whether BECU actually filed any UCC statements for your secured card or if it's just account-level security.
One more thing - make sure your UCC-1 continuation gets filed on time regardless of this BECU issue. You don't want to let that lapse while sorting out the secured card question.
Evelyn Xu
Just to close the loop on this - I ended up filing with a straightforward equipment description and kept all the covenant language in the security agreement. No issues with the filing and everything was accepted. Thanks for the help everyone. The key insight was realizing that UCC covenant definition isn't something that belongs in the filing itself - covenants are contractual terms that stay in your loan documents.
0 coins
Dominic Green
•Glad it worked out! This is one of those things that seems more complicated than it actually is.
0 coins
Hannah Flores
•Perfect example of keeping the UCC filing focused on its purpose - giving notice of the security interest, not publishing the loan terms.
0 coins
Kayla Jacobson
For anyone else reading this thread later - the main takeaway is that covenant language belongs in your security agreement, not your UCC filing. The UCC-1 should have a clear collateral description that identifies what's secured, but it doesn't need to include the contractual restrictions (covenants) that apply to that collateral. Keep it simple and keep it focused on perfecting your security interest.
0 coins
William Rivera
•This should be pinned or something. Really clear explanation of how to handle covenant issues in UCC filings.
0 coins
Grace Lee
•Agreed - this thread answered a question I didn't even know I had about covenant definitions in UCC filings.
0 coins