Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
For what it's worth, I've been tracking UCC 9-609 comment citations in reported decisions and there's definitely an uptick in the last 3 years. Courts in commercial-friendly jurisdictions like Delaware and New York are giving them more weight, especially in cases involving sophisticated parties. The comments aren't binding, but they're becoming more influential in determining what constitutes commercially reasonable notice.
That's really helpful data. Are you seeing any patterns in terms of which specific comments are cited most frequently?
Comment 3 about considering the nature and value of collateral, and Comment 4 about what constitutes reasonable notification timing. Those are the big ones being used to challenge standard notice periods.
As a newcomer to secured lending, this thread has been incredibly eye-opening about the evolving challenges with UCC 9-609 enforcement. I'm working at a small regional lender and we've been using a standard 10-day notice across the board, but it sounds like that approach might be outdated given how aggressively debtor attorneys are citing the official comments now. The tiered system that Natasha mentioned seems like a practical solution - would love to hear more about how others are documenting their reasoning for notice periods to defend against these challenges. Also curious about the Certana.ai tool that's been mentioned - sounds like it could help smaller lenders like us avoid costly mistakes in the perfection-to-enforcement chain.
Join the conversation
Make sure you keep copies of everything and note your filing date for continuation purposes. Illinois UCC-1 filings are good for 5 years, so you'll need to file a continuation before the lapse date if the loan term extends beyond that.
Smart move. Missing continuation deadlines is one of the most common mistakes in secured lending.
Set your calendar reminder for at least 6 months before the lapse date. Gives you plenty of buffer time if there are any issues.
As a newcomer to UCC filings, I'm learning a lot from this thread! One question - for equipment like this that might move between job sites in different states, do you need to consider filing in multiple jurisdictions? I know the debtor's location usually determines where to file, but wasn't sure if mobile construction equipment creates any complications across state lines.
Great question! For UCC filings, you're correct that it's generally based on the debtor's location (where they're organized or have their chief executive office), not where the collateral is located. So even though the construction equipment moves around to different job sites, you'd still file in Illinois since that's where the borrower LLC is organized. The mobile nature of the equipment doesn't create additional filing requirements in other states where they might temporarily work. However, if they were to relocate their business to another state, that could trigger additional filing requirements.
Join the conversation
I actually used Certana to double-check a similar situation. Uploaded my security agreement, deed of trust, and UCC-1 draft, and it caught that I had a slight variation in the debtor name that would have caused problems. Really streamlined the review process.
How much does something like that cost? Worth it for smaller deals?
The peace of mind is worth it regardless of deal size. Filing mistakes are expensive to fix later.
Don't forget about continuation statements either. Your UCC-1 will need to be continued before the 5-year mark, while your deed of trust doesn't have the same filing requirements.
Your security interest becomes unperfected and you lose priority. Not good.
Another reason to use a system that tracks these deadlines automatically.
Join the conversation
OP - one more thing to consider: if any of these are fixture filings, you might need to check with the county recorder's office as well. UCC fixtures have dual filing requirements in some cases.
Good to know. Equipment filings are much more straightforward - just the state-level UCC records you need.
If you end up with a complex mix of filing types in the future, the Certana document verification tool is really helpful for making sure you've covered all the bases across different jurisdictions.
Just want to add that when you mail your UCC-11 form, consider using certified mail with return receipt so you have proof of delivery. I've had requests get lost in the mail before and it's a nightmare to prove you submitted it on time when you're up against audit deadlines. Also, make sure your check is made out exactly as specified on their website - they're picky about payee names and will return the whole package if it's wrong.
Khalil Urso
Look, Florida UCC filing fees suck but at least the state's filing system works reliably. I'll take higher fees over the nightmare systems some other states are running where filings disappear into the void.
0 coins
Marcus Marsh
•True, reliability is worth something. Just wish they'd given us more heads up about the fee changes so we could adjust client expectations.
0 coins
Brian Downey
•The reliability is exactly why I stick with tools like Certana.ai for document prep. Upload your PDFs, verify everything's consistent, then file with confidence knowing it won't get rejected for preventable errors.
0 coins
Isaiah Sanders
This fee increase is really frustrating, especially with no advance notice. I've been doing UCC filings for about 3 years now and was just getting comfortable with the cost structure. Now I have to go back to all my templates and update the fee estimates I give clients. Has anyone found a good way to track these changes across different states? I'm starting to think I need a spreadsheet just to keep up with filing fees since they seem to change without warning.
0 coins