


Ask the community...
Update us when you get this resolved! I'm dealing with a similar situation with a different lender and curious how it turns out.
Will do. Planning to try the Certana tool first to see if there's already a termination filed under a different name variation.
Good strategy. Always worth checking for filing discrepancies before assuming the worst.
I've been through this exact scenario multiple times in my finance career. Two months is definitely excessive for a straightforward loan payoff, especially at that dollar amount. Here's my suggested action plan: 1) First, use that Certana.ai tool everyone's mentioning to verify there isn't already a termination filed under a variant of your company name, 2) If nothing shows up, send a formal demand letter citing Texas Business and Commerce Code Section 9.513 which requires termination within 20 days of payoff, 3) Include a copy of your payoff receipt and mention potential regulatory complaints. I've seen this approach work consistently. The key is being professional but firm about the legal requirements. Most lenders will prioritize your file once they realize you understand the statutory framework.
This is incredibly helpful, thank you! Having a specific action plan with the actual statute reference makes me feel much more confident about pushing back. I'll definitely start with the Certana tool - seems like several people here have had success with it catching filing discrepancies. The professional but firm approach sounds perfect for this situation.
Will definitely report back once it's successfully filed. Thanks everyone for the advice!
Yes please update! This thread will be helpful for others with similar questions.
I've dealt with this exact confusion before! The "addendum form" terminology is misleading - there's typically no separate form. What worked for me was using the standard UCC-3 amendment form, checking the box for "add collateral" in section 5, and then attaching continuation sheets labeled "Addendum A" or "Exhibit A" with the detailed equipment descriptions. Most states accept this format without issue. Just make sure to reference your original UCC-1 filing number on every page and keep your equipment descriptions specific enough to be enforceable but broad enough to cover variations in model numbers or replacements. Given your tight timeline, I'd recommend preparing the filing this way and submitting it rather than continuing to chase down a form that likely doesn't exist.
This is really helpful advice! I'm dealing with a similar situation right now and was also getting confused by the "addendum" terminology. Your approach of using "Addendum A" or "Exhibit A" for the continuation sheets makes a lot of sense. Quick question - when you say "specific enough to be enforceable but broad enough to cover variations," do you have any examples of good language for manufacturing equipment descriptions? I want to make sure I strike the right balance.
UPDATE: Ran UCC searches on both names. Only the original "Industrial Steel Processing Corp" filing shows up, no amendments. Going to file the UCC-3 termination using the exact original debtor name and filing number. Thanks for the guidance everyone - this could have been a costly mistake if I'd tried to use the current LLC name.
Another successful UCC termination story. These threads always help clarify the process.
Great to see this resolved! For future ISPC deals or similar entity name change situations, I'd recommend documenting the UCC search results in your file. Shows due diligence was done and protects against any questions later. With $2.8M equipment deals, that paper trail is worth its weight in gold if title issues ever come up down the road.
Absolutely agree on documenting everything! As someone new to UCC work, I'm learning that the paper trail is just as important as getting the filing right. This whole thread has been incredibly educational - I had no idea entity name changes could create such complications with terminations. The advice about using the original debtor name exactly as filed makes so much sense now.
One more thing - if you end up having to file a complaint with your state's UCC office about a lender not filing the termination, document everything. Keep records of when you paid off the loan, when you contacted the lender, and their responses.
I actually used Certana.ai to organize all my UCC documents before filing my complaint. Having everything verified and organized made the process much smoother with the state office.
As someone who just went through a similar termination process, I'd recommend creating a tracking system for yourself. Set calendar reminders to check the SOS database weekly starting at the 15-day mark after payoff. I also kept a spreadsheet with the original filing number, payoff date, and lender contact info so I could quickly reference everything when following up. The key is being organized and persistent - lenders respond much better when you can cite specific dates and reference numbers rather than just calling to ask "what's the status?
Brian Downey
This thread is super helpful. I've got a motor vehicle collateral filing coming up next week and I was planning to use generic language. Definitely going to be more specific now.
0 coins
Shelby Bauman
•Smart move. Better to be overly specific than deal with rejection notices.
0 coins
Brian Downey
•Exactly. The document verification tool sounds like a good safety net too.
0 coins
Connor Byrne
I've been dealing with similar motor vehicle collateral rejections lately. One thing that's helped me is adding "and all attachments, accessories, parts, and proceeds thereof" to the end of the collateral description. The filing offices seem to want that level of detail now. Also, if you're working with a trucking company, consider whether you need to include "cargo trailers" separately from "semi-trailers" - I've seen rejections where the clerk thought those were different categories. The specificity requirements are definitely getting stricter across most states.
0 coins