


Ask the community...
Just a quick update - I got a follow-up call from ESD today asking if everything was resolved to my satisfaction. The agent explained that my case had been flagged for "manual review" but somehow got lost in their queue until the governor's inquiry pushed it to the front. She apologized for the delay and said they're working on improving their internal tracking system. So it seems like contacting the governor really did make a difference in my case.
OF COURSE they called to apologize after the governor's office got involved! But they couldn't be bothered to look at your claim for 7 WEEKS before that??? This just proves how broken the system is. Glad you got paid but it shouldn't take executive intervention to get your legally entitled benefits. The whole system needs an overhaul!
so like what if u made exactly ur weekly benefit amount? do u get nothing that week or do u get something?
If you earn exactly your weekly benefit amount, you would not receive any unemployment benefits for that week. You only receive benefits when your earnings are less than your weekly benefit amount. In that case, ESD deducts 75% of what you earned from your weekly benefit. But if your earnings equal or exceed your weekly benefit amount, you receive $0 for that week. Still file your weekly claim though!
One more tip based on my experience - print out or screenshot the confirmation page after you submit your weekly claim with the high earnings reported. I had an issue once where ESD later questioned my reporting, and having those screenshots saved my butt! Just a good practice in general when dealing with unemployment stuff.
Yes, you'll receive copies of any response your employer submits. The Commissioner's Review is less formal than the hearing process but still follows procedural rules. To answer your earlier question - yes, you should attach relevant documentation to your message. Include: 1. A copy of your hearing decision (with docket number) 2. Any evidence that supports your position 3. A clear explanation of why the judge's interpretation was incorrect Keep in mind that you generally can't introduce new evidence that wasn't presented at the original hearing. The review focuses on whether the judge made legal errors based on the evidence already presented.
Let us know how it goes! I've got my fingers crossed for you. The whole unemployment system feels designed to wear people down until they give up. but stay persistent!!
Good luck with your application! Just to clarify something that was mentioned earlier - the Training Benefits extension can be up to 26 weeks, but the exact number depends on your specific situation and training program length. Some people get the full 26 weeks, others might get less. If your medical coding program is 9 months (about 36-40 weeks), and you have 6 weeks of regular benefits left, you might have a gap between when Training Benefits end and when your program finishes. Plan your budget accordingly, or check if your school has any financial aid options to cover that period. Don't forget that once you're approved, you'll still need to file your weekly claims just like with regular unemployment - including reporting your part-time work hours and earnings. The only difference is you won't have to do job searches.
I want to emphasize something important: apply for Training Benefits ASAP. Don't wait until your benefits are about to run out. The application process involves multiple steps and potential delays: 1. You submit the initial application 2. ESD reviews it and may request additional documentation 3. You submit any requested documents 4. ESD makes a determination 5. If approved, they send a formal approval letter Each of these steps can take time. With only 6 weeks left on your claim, you're already in a time crunch. Submit your application this week if possible. Also, keep detailed records of everything - confirmation numbers, copies of all documents you submit, names of ESD representatives you speak with, etc. This documentation is invaluable if there are any issues later.
Rajan Walker
just wondering if anyone else is having issues with the 'Ability and Availability' questions throwing their claims into adjudication? i answered YES to being available for work every single time but somehow my claim got flagged anyway. makes no sense!!!!
0 coins
Jungleboo Soletrain
•This is actually a common issue. The system sometimes flags claims even when you answer correctly if there's any inconsistency with other information in your claim. For example, if you indicated certain work restrictions or limitations elsewhere in your application, it might trigger an availability review even if you answered 'Yes' to being available. Another possibility is that your employer provided information suggesting you might not be available (like if they indicated you turned down work or had scheduling restrictions). The adjudication process is supposed to sort this out, but as we've all seen, that's taking much longer than normal right now.
0 coins
Anna Xian
UPDATE: The Governor's Office escalation WORKED! Just got an update on my eServices account this morning - all my pending claims have been approved and payment is being processed! It took exactly 2 business days after I called the Governor's Office. For anyone else stuck in adjudication with no explanation, I 100% recommend this approach. Thanks to everyone who provided advice!
0 coins
Avery Davis
•That's amazing! Did they ever explain what caused the disqualification in the first place?
0 coins
Anna Xian
•Yes, actually! I got a call from an ESD specialist who explained there was a flag on my account because my former employer had initially contested the claim (saying I was fired for misconduct instead of laid off). Once they reviewed the documentation I submitted showing it was a position elimination, they approved everything. The specialist apologized for the delay and said they should have contacted me weeks ago but are just overwhelmed right now.
0 coins