Will my wife's teacher pension reduce her Social Security survivor benefits due to WEP/GPO rules?
I'm trying to make the right decision about when to claim Social Security. I'm 64 and the higher earner in our household (earned about $92,000 last year). I understand delaying until 70 would give me a larger benefit and eventually provide my wife with a higher survivor benefit if I pass before her. Here's the complicated part - my wife has been teaching for 22 years in a school district that doesn't participate in Social Security. Before teaching, she worked various jobs for about 12 years that DID pay into Social Security, so she has enough credits (40+) to qualify for her own SS benefit. Someone at my wife's retirement planning seminar mentioned something called a "windfall rule" that would reduce her benefits regardless of when I claim. Is this true? Will delaying my benefits until 70 actually help her survivor benefits, or will they get reduced anyway because of her teacher pension? I'm confused about whether this WEP or GPO (I think that's what they called it) would negate the advantage of me waiting. Can someone clarify how this works with teacher pensions from non-covered employment? Is it still worth me delaying to 70?
19 comments


Brianna Muhammad
This is actually a great question about the Government Pension Offset (GPO) and Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP). You're dealing with two separate issues: 1. WEP affects your wife's OWN Social Security benefits based on her work history in SS-covered jobs. Since she worked in non-SS-covered employment and will receive a pension from that work, her own SS benefit will likely be reduced (not eliminated). 2. GPO affects SPOUSAL and SURVIVOR benefits. This is what you need to worry about regarding your wife's survivor benefits after you pass. GPO will reduce her survivor benefits by 2/3 of her non-covered pension amount. Importantly, your decision to delay claiming until 70 STILL MATTERS because: - Your own benefit will be larger (about 8% per year of delay) - Her survivor benefit is based on your benefit amount - Even after GPO reduction, a larger starting survivor benefit means more money for her So yes, delaying is still advantageous if you can afford to wait, even with GPO in the picture.
0 coins
Camila Castillo
•Thank you for that explanation. So if I understand correctly, even though her survivor benefit will be reduced by 2/3 of her pension amount, starting with a higher benefit (by me delaying) will still result in more money for her overall? For example, if my benefit at 70 would be $3,500 vs. $2,600 if I claimed now, and her teacher pension is $4,200/month, the GPO reduction would be the same either way (2/3 of $4,200), but she'd still get more from the higher starting point. Is that right?
0 coins
JaylinCharles
BEWARE!! My husband was in THE EXACT SAME SITUATION!! He delayed till 70 thinking my teachers pension wouldn't matter much. When he passed away last year, I got NOTHING from his Social Security!!! The GPO took it ALL because my pension was too high!! The SSA office people didn't warn us about this in advance!!! I'm so angry we didn't understand this sooner!! Make sure you do the ACTUAL MATH with real numbers from your situation. Don't just assume delaying will help!!!!
0 coins
Eloise Kendrick
•I'm sorry about your husband, but your situation is actually not typical for everyone dealing with GPO. The reduction is always 2/3 of the non-covered pension, which means you only lose ALL survivor benefits if your pension is very high compared to what your husband's benefit was. For example: - If pension is $3,000/month, GPO reduction is $2,000 - If potential survivor benefit is $2,800, you'd still receive $800 after GPO - If potential survivor benefit is only $1,800, GPO would eliminate it The original poster needs to calculate his wife's potential teacher pension amount and compare it to his projected Social Security benefit to see if she'd still receive something after the GPO reduction. It varies by individual circumstances.
0 coins
Lucas Schmidt
my wife had this same issue. she taught for 30 yrs in ohio which doesnt do ss. what we learned is that if she takes her ohio pension first, her ss gets reduced. but if she takes ss first and then the pension, no reduction. might be something to look into. good luck man its confusing.
0 coins
Brianna Muhammad
•I'm afraid that's not correct. The order in which you claim benefits doesn't affect whether WEP or GPO applies. These provisions are based on receiving both a non-covered pension and Social Security benefits, regardless of which one you take first. The Social Security Administration applies these reductions automatically once they know you're receiving a non-covered pension. This is a common misconception that unfortunately leads to disappointment when people find out the actual rules.
0 coins
Freya Collins
I dealt with this exact situation last year when planning my retirement. After hours of being on hold trying to reach Social Security to ask about WEP/GPO calculations, I found a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that got me connected to an SSA agent in under 20 minutes instead of waiting for hours. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU The agent I spoke with ran the actual numbers based on my specific situation and showed me exactly how much the GPO would reduce my wife's potential survivor benefits. This was incredibly helpful because the online calculators were giving me different answers than what the SSA determined. I'd recommend getting the actual calculation from SSA rather than guessing, especially with something this important.
0 coins
LongPeri
•Does this service actually work? I've been trying to get through to SS for weeks about my disability application and keep getting disconnected or waiting forever.
0 coins
LongPeri
My ex is a teacher with a non-SS pension and from what I understand, it depends on how much her pension is vs what your SS benefit would be. The 2/3 rule means that if her pension is really big, she might not get anything from your SS even if you wait. But if her pension is smaller, waiting would still help her get more. Its really about running the numbers for your specific situation
0 coins
Camila Castillo
Thank you all for the responses. I'm starting to understand this better. I think I need to find out exactly how much my wife's teacher pension will be when she retires in 2 years. From what I'm gathering, if her pension is large, the GPO might wipe out most or all of her survivor benefits regardless of when I claim. But if it's moderate, then my delaying could still benefit her. I'll try to get specific numbers from both SSA and her pension system so we can make an informed decision. This is much more complicated than I initially thought!
0 coins
Brianna Muhammad
•That's the right approach. Get both numbers and do the math: 1. Calculate your age 70 benefit (approximately 132% of your FRA benefit) 2. Get an estimate of your wife's teacher pension 3. Calculate the GPO reduction (2/3 of her pension) 4. Subtract the GPO reduction from your age 70 benefit 5. Compare that to what she'd receive if you claimed earlier Also consider your own longevity and financial needs. Delaying to 70 means missing out on 6 years of payments, which could be $150,000+ in benefits you'd never receive if you don't live long enough. This needs to be weighed against the potential higher survivor benefit for your wife.
0 coins
Oscar O'Neil
I just want to add that the rules for WEP and GPO are incredibly unfair to public servants like teachers! My mother taught for 35 years and lost almost all her SS from my dad when he passed because of this rule. Congress should repeal these provisions!! They're basically penalizing people twice!!
0 coins
Eloise Kendrick
•While I understand the frustration, it's not exactly a double penalty. The original purpose of WEP/GPO was to prevent what Social Security saw as a "windfall" for government employees. Without these provisions, someone could work just enough under Social Security to qualify for benefits, spend most of their career in non-covered employment, and receive a proportionally higher SS benefit than someone who paid in their entire career. That said, there have been bills introduced in Congress over the years to modify or repeal these provisions, but none have passed due to the significant cost to the Social Security system that would result.
0 coins
LongPeri
Has your wife looked into if she can get a lump sum for her pension instead of monthly payments? My aunt did this with her state pension and somehow it helped with the GPO thing. Not sure if all pension plans allow this tho
0 coins
Brianna Muhammad
•That's generally not a viable workaround. While some pension systems offer lump sum options, the SSA has rules to prevent using this as a way to avoid GPO. If you take a lump sum pension, they'll calculate what the equivalent monthly pension would have been and still apply GPO as if you were receiving those monthly payments. They specifically closed this loophole years ago.
0 coins
Camila Castillo
I called my wife's pension system today. Her projected pension after 24 years (when she plans to retire) will be about $3,850 monthly. So if I'm understanding correctly, the GPO reduction would be about $2,567 (2/3 of $3,850). My SS benefit at 70 would be around $3,940 vs. $2,950 if I claimed now at 64. So it looks like if I delay to 70, she would still get about $1,373 in survivor benefits after the GPO reduction. If I claim now, she'd only get about $383 after GPO. Does that math look right to everyone? Seems like delaying would still help her significantly in this case.
0 coins
Eloise Kendrick
•Your math is correct, and this is a perfect example of why personalized calculations matter. In your specific situation, delaying to 70 would give your wife about $990 more per month in survivor benefits after you pass ($1,373 vs $383). That's a significant difference that could greatly impact her financial security. Of course, you'll need to weigh this against your own needs, health outlook, and financial situation during the years you're delaying benefits. But from a pure survivor benefit perspective, the numbers make a strong case for delaying in your specific situation.
0 coins
Isabel Vega
As a new member who's been researching this topic for my own family situation, I want to thank everyone for this incredibly detailed discussion. The math example that Camila provided really helps illustrate how these calculations work in practice. One thing I'd add for anyone reading this thread: make sure to also consider that your wife's own Social Security benefit (from her 12 years of covered employment) will likely be reduced by WEP when she starts collecting it. This is separate from the GPO impact on survivor benefits, but it's another piece of the puzzle that affects overall retirement planning. Also, I've found that many local SSA offices have staff who aren't fully versed in WEP/GPO calculations, so getting multiple opinions or using the online calculators on SSA.gov can be helpful to verify the numbers you're given. Your situation shows that even with these provisions, strategic timing decisions can still make a meaningful difference. The $990 monthly difference in survivor benefits you calculated is substantial over time.
0 coins
Victoria Charity
•Welcome to the community, Isabel! You make an excellent point about the WEP reduction on the wife's own Social Security benefit - that's definitely another layer to consider in the overall planning. I'm curious about your mention of getting multiple opinions from SSA offices. Have you found significant variation in the knowledge level of staff when it comes to these calculations? It seems like WEP/GPO are complex enough that not all representatives may be equally familiar with the nuances. Also, for anyone following this thread, Isabel's advice about using the online calculators is spot on. The SSA website has specific WEP and GPO calculators that can help verify the math, though as we've seen from this discussion, getting the actual projected pension amounts is crucial for accurate results. @20ea8c58d5d0 Your situation really demonstrates how important it is to run the actual numbers rather than making assumptions about these provisions. The nearly $1,000 monthly difference in survivor benefits makes a compelling case for your delay strategy.
0 coins