Will my reduced 2025 income affect my Social Security benefits at FRA? Should I file early?
I'm reaching my full retirement age (67) in mid-2026, but this year has been brutal financially. Had to take almost 5 months off work due to some serious health problems (nothing life-threatening, but couldn't work). My income for 2025 will end up around $30,000 instead of my usual $50,000+. I'm worried about how this income drop might impact my eventual SS benefit amount. I'm debating whether to file for benefits in December 2025 when I turn 66, so they don't include this lower-earning year in my calculation. Or maybe it doesn't really matter in the big picture? I'm confused about how they actually calculate the benefit amount and whether one bad year will significantly reduce my monthly checks. Has anyone been through something similar? Should I just wait until my actual FRA next year?
19 comments
Liam Duke
They use your 35 highest earning years to calculate your benefit, so one lower year won't make a huge impact. The real question is - how does this $30k year compare to your other working years? If you've consistently earned more throughout your career, this one dip won't matter much. But if this will be one of your 35 highest years despite the reduction, then yes it could slightly reduce your PIA (Primary Insurance Amount). As for starting at 66 vs your actual FRA, you'll face a small reduction (about 6-7%) for claiming early. I'd suggest getting your earnings record from MySocialSecurity account and looking at your year-by-year history before deciding.
0 coins
Dana Doyle
•Thanks for the explanation! I just checked my earnings record and realized most of my early career years (1980s) show earnings below $30k, so I guess this year might still count in my top 35. I hadn't considered that. So waiting until my actual FRA might be better even with this reduced income year?
0 coins
Manny Lark
dont worry about 1 bad year!! they take ur top 35 years anyway so it probably wont even count! i had 2 years where i barely worked and my benefit calculation didnt change much
0 coins
Rita Jacobs
•This is generally correct, but I should clarify one thing - it's not necessarily your "top" 35 years, but rather your 35 highest-earning years after indexing for inflation. Years before age 60 get indexed upward to account for wage growth over time, which means older lower-earning years might actually count for more than you'd expect in the calculation.
0 coins
Khalid Howes
I think your looking at this ALL WRONG!!! The real question you should be asking is about your HEALTH not your money. You said you missed 5 MONTHS of work for medical issues!!! That's serious. If your health is declining, taking SS earlier could be smarter even with a reduction. What good is waiting for more money if your too sick to enjoy it??? SSA doesn't care about your reasons for low income. They just use the numbers. The system is BROKEN for people with health problems!
0 coins
Dana Doyle
•You make a good point about the health aspect. To clarify though, my health issues are resolved now - it was a complicated surgery with a longer-than-expected recovery. I'm back to full health, so I'm expecting to work until my FRA if possible. But you're right that health considerations should be part of the equation.
0 coins
Ben Cooper
Nobody mentioned this yet but have you considered applying for SSDI (Social Security Disability Insurance) for the months you couldn't work? If you were unable to work for medical reasons, you might qualify for back payments. Might be worth looking into even though you're back at work now.
0 coins
Naila Gordon
•This is a great suggestion in theory, but SSDI has a 5-month waiting period before benefits start. Since the original poster was off work for just under 5 months, they likely wouldn't qualify for any disability payments. Also, the medical condition would need to be expected to last at least 12 months or result in death to qualify for SSDI, which doesn't sound like the case here.
0 coins
Cynthia Love
Have you tried calling the SSA to discuss your specific situation? When I was making similar decisions last year, I spent WEEKS trying to get through on their 800 number. Always busy signals or disconnects after waiting on hold forever. I finally tried a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that got me through to an agent in under 20 minutes. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU The agent I spoke with ran calculations for different filing ages based on my specific earnings record and it helped me make a much more informed decision. Totally worth it since this is a decision that affects your income for the rest of your life.
0 coins
Dana Doyle
•I hadn't heard of that service before! I tried calling SSA once but gave up after 45 minutes on hold. I'll check out that link - getting personalized calculations would definitely help me make a better decision. Thanks for the tip!
0 coins
Manny Lark
•does that thing actually work? i hate calling ssa... always waste half my day
0 coins
Liam Duke
One aspect we haven't discussed is the earnings test. If you claim at 66 but continue working in 2026, you'll be subject to the earnings limit until you reach your FRA. For 2025, the limit for people reaching FRA during the year is $56,520. Earn over that and they withhold $1 for every $3 above the limit. If you expect to earn good money next year, this might be another reason to just wait until your full FRA when the earnings test no longer applies.
0 coins
Dana Doyle
•Great point! I am planning to continue working full-time in 2026, and I'll definitely earn above that threshold. I didn't realize they'd withhold benefits if I started taking them before hitting my FRA. That changes my thinking - sounds like waiting makes more sense in my situation.
0 coins
Rita Jacobs
Based on everything I've read here, waiting until your Full Retirement Age seems like the optimal choice for your situation because: 1. One lower-earning year won't significantly impact your benefit calculation if you have 35+ years of work history 2. You're planning to continue working at a good salary in 2026 3. You'd be subject to the earnings test if you claim before FRA 4. Your health issues are resolved and you expect to live a normal lifespan The difference between filing at 66 vs. 67 is approximately 6.7% of your benefit amount for the rest of your life. That's significant over a 20+ year retirement.
0 coins
Khalid Howes
•This makes sense for MOST people but everyone's situation is DIFFERENT! The 6.7% matters less if you die young! Break-even point is typically around 80 years old. OP should think about family health history too!
0 coins
Ben Cooper
I had a similar situation 2 years ago. Bad health, income dropped, worried about SS calculation. What I found is that Social Security replaces more of your income if you're a lower earner (it's progressive). So the calculation isn't strictly proportional. Someone earning $30k doesn't get exactly half the benefit of someone earning $60k. The lower earner actually gets more than half.
0 coins
Dana Doyle
•That's interesting and makes me feel a bit better. I'd been thinking it was a straight percentage calculation, but it sounds like there's a bit of a safety net built in for lower-earning years. Thanks for sharing your experience.
0 coins
Cynthia Love
After reading all this advice, what are you thinking you'll do? It's good to get different perspectives, but ultimately it's a personal decision based on your unique circumstances.
0 coins
Dana Doyle
•I think I'm leaning toward waiting until my actual FRA next year. The earnings test would definitely be an issue if I filed early, and it sounds like one lower-earning year won't drastically reduce my benefit. Plus, I'm back to good health now, so no reason to rush into claiming early. Thanks to everyone for the helpful advice!
0 coins