< Back to Social Security Administration

Isaiah Cross

Social Security survivors benefits at FRA while working - tax implications with CalPERS/CalSTRS income?

I'm hitting a financial crossroads with my Social Security decision. I'm reaching my Full Retirement Age (FRA) on March 30th and eligible for survivors benefits around $2,000/month. I've been told I can apply now but preserve January as my filing date. My situation is complicated because I'm currently working full-time (teaching job under CalSTRS) while also collecting my CalPERS retirement from my previous career. My income is actually pretty good, but I made a mess of my taxes this year - didn't have enough withheld and didn't set up any IRAs or other tax shelters. Now I'm facing a hefty tax bill. I'm planning to continue teaching for another 1-2 years, but I'm concerned about adding Social Security survivors benefits on top of my current income and making my tax situation even worse. Should I just wait until I fully retire to claim survivors benefits? Or is there some strategy I'm missing that would let me collect now without creating an even bigger tax headache? Any advice from those who've navigated Social Security benefits while working with multiple income streams?

At Full Retirement Age, there's no earnings test for Social Security, so you can collect your full survivors benefit while working without reduction. But yes, it will increase your taxable income. Up to 85% of your Social Security could be taxable depending on your provisional income (adjusted gross income + 50% of SS benefits + tax-exempt interest). With your CalPERS, CalSTRS, and teaching salary, you're likely already in a high tax bracket. Since you don't necessarily need the money right now (having "adequate salary"), you might consider waiting until you stop teaching to reduce your tax burden. Though remember, you're essentially leaving $2,000/month on the table. Some financial planners argue it's better to take the money and pay the taxes than to leave benefits unclaimed.

0 coins

Thank you for explaining this! I hadn't fully understood the 85% taxation threshold. So even though I've reached FRA and can get my full benefit while working, the tax implications might make waiting worthwhile... That's a tough choice - $24,000/year is a lot to leave unclaimed, but my tax bracket is already causing me problems.

0 coins

im in similar boat. took survivors benefits at 66 (my FRA) while still working part time. YES it raised my taxes but the way i see it more money is more money even if uncle sam takes some. better to have 70% of something than 100% of nothing!!! just set aside extra for taxes maybe?

0 coins

THIS! People overthink this stuff! If someone offered you $2000 a month but said you had to give back $600 in taxes, would you refuse the $1400? That makes no sense! Take the money! You earned it through your spouse's contributions!!

0 coins

There are several strategies you could consider: 1. Take the survivors benefits now, but increase your tax withholding on your CalSTRS or CalPERS payments to account for the additional income. 2. If you're age 72 or older, consider making Qualified Charitable Distributions from any traditional IRAs you might have, which can reduce your taxable income. 3. Maximize your 403(b) contributions through your teaching position to reduce your overall taxable income - the limit for 2025 is $23,000 plus an additional $7,500 if you're over 50. 4. Determine if you're subject to the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) or Government Pension Offset (GPO) due to your CalPERS/CalSTRS pensions, as these could affect your survivors benefits amount. Remember that at FRA, there's no earnings test penalty, so your only consideration is taxation of benefits, not reduction of benefits.

0 coins

Thank you for these suggestions! I hadn't thought about increasing withholding from CalSTRS/CalPERS to offset the additional tax burden. And I definitely need to look into my 403(b) options through my teaching job. I've been contributing but not maximizing. I was told the GPO won't affect my survivors benefits since my husband never worked in a job covered by CalPERS/CalSTRS, but I should double-check this.

0 coins

I spent 35 years as a tax advisor for clients with public pensions. You should absolutely take your survivor benefit now! Here's why: 1. You can't "save up" Social Security benefits - months you don't claim are permanently lost 2. Tax-advantaged options: maximize your 403b contributions ($23,000 + $7,500 catch-up if over 50), which reduces your AGI 3. Consider a Health Savings Account if you have a high-deductible health plan 4. Tax withheld from SS can be adjusted using Form W-4V Yes, you'll pay some taxes, but you'll still come out ahead financially. Don't leave $2,000/month on the table because of tax concerns!

0 coins

This is very helpful - I hadn't considered that I'm essentially forfeiting benefits by not claiming them. I like the idea of adjusting withholding using Form W-4V and maximizing my 403b. I'm going to run the numbers and see how much I'd actually keep after taxes.

0 coins

I tried calling Social Security about a similar situation last month and spent HOURS on hold only to get disconnected THREE TIMES! So frustrating. Then someone told me about a service called Claimyr that got me through to a real SSA agent in under 20 minutes. Seriously saved my sanity. They have a video demo at https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU that shows how it works. Once I actually talked to an agent, they explained exactly how my pension affected my benefits and the tax implications. Much better than guessing!

0 coins

Thanks for the tip! I've been avoiding calling because I've heard horror stories about the wait times. I'll check out that service - I definitely need to speak with someone at SSA who can look at my specific situation before making a decision.

0 coins

You people are OVERTHINKING this! The SSA and IRS are STEALING our money with these complicated rules! Just take your benefits NOW! You EARNED them! Your spouse PAID INTO the system! Don't let the government keep money that's RIGHTFULLY YOURS just because they might tax some of it back!

0 coins

While I understand your frustration, it's important to make financial decisions based on one's complete situation. For some people, waiting might actually result in keeping more money overall, depending on their tax bracket and other income sources. It's not always as simple as "take it now.

0 coins

did u check if the calpers pension effects ur SS? my wife had a teachers pension in ohio and it reduced her SS by like 2/3! some rule called windfall something i think

0 coins

You're referring to the Government Pension Offset (GPO) and Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP). The GPO can reduce spousal or survivor benefits for people who receive pensions from work not covered by Social Security. The WEP affects your own retirement benefits if you receive a pension from non-SS-covered work. For the original poster: Since you're claiming survivor benefits (not your own retirement), the GPO could apply, potentially reducing your survivor benefit by 2/3 of your CalPERS/CalSTRS pension amount. You should definitely verify this with SSA before making your decision.

0 coins

Oh no! I was under the impression that GPO wouldn't affect me since my husband worked in the private sector his entire career. Now I'm worried. Definitely need to confirm this before making my decision - could completely change the math if my survivors benefit would be reduced significantly.

0 coins

Everyone's talking about taking benefits now vs. waiting, but there's another option: You mentioned you can apply now but preserve January as your filing date. This is likely referring to the 6-month retroactive benefits available at FRA. If you apply in March, you could potentially get benefits back to September (not January though, unless I'm misunderstanding something). With retroactive benefits, you'd get a lump sum for those months, which could impact your taxes differently than monthly payments. Worth considering how a lump sum vs. regular payments might affect your tax situation.

0 coins

Good catch! Though to clarify: at FRA, survivors benefits can actually have up to 12 months of retroactivity, not just 6 months (the 6-month limit applies to retirement benefits). So if the poster applies in March 2025, they could potentially claim back to March 2024, assuming they were already at FRA then. And you're right about tax planning - a lump sum retroactive payment might push them into a higher bracket for 2025. There are special tax rules for lump-sum distributions that might help (filing an amended return or special calculations), but it gets complicated quickly.

0 coins

One consideration I haven't seen mentioned: if you're planning to claim your own Social Security retirement benefit someday (separate from the survivor benefit), the timing of the survivor claim doesn't affect your own retirement benefit. You could take the survivor benefit now and later switch to your own retirement benefit if it ends up being higher. Regarding taxes, calculating the exact impact would require knowing your specific tax situation, but if you're already in the 24% or higher federal bracket, expect to pay at least that rate on about 85% of your SS benefits. State taxation varies - California doesn't tax Social Security, which is helpful for you. A financial planner who specializes in public employee pensions might be worth consulting for your specific situation.

0 coins

That's a great point about California not taxing Social Security! I hadn't factored that in. And yes, I do have my own retirement benefit that I could claim later (though it would be less than the survivor benefit). I'm leaning toward claiming now and dealing with the tax implications, especially after learning about the California tax advantage. Thank you!

0 coins

Social Security Administration AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today