Social Security survivor benefits at 66 vs FRA - tax implications with high income?
I lost my husband last April after 30 years of marriage and I'm trying to figure out the best strategy for survivor benefits. I just turned 66 this month and still working full-time earning about $6560 monthly ($1640/week). My job provides health insurance which I need. My Full Retirement Age is December 2025, and I'm planning to work until 67, then possibly take my own retirement benefit at 70 since mine is higher than my late husband's. My main question is about TAXES - would it make more sense to wait until my FRA to claim survivor benefits? With my income level, I'm worried about tax implications if I take survivor benefits now vs waiting until FRA. Has anyone been in a similar situation? Any advice on minimizing the tax hit while maximizing benefits?
19 comments
PixelPrincess
First, I'm sorry for your loss. From a tax perspective, waiting until your FRA to claim survivor benefits might be advantageous in your situation. At your current income level ($78,720/year), 85% of any Social Security benefits would likely be taxable. The survivor benefit at FRA would be 100% of your husband's benefit amount, whereas taking it now at 66 would result in a reduction to about 95.6% since you're a few months before your FRA. Since you're already planning to take your own benefit at 70 (smart move for the higher amount), waiting until FRA for survivor benefits gives you two advantages: slightly higher monthly amount AND potentially lower income during the claiming period if you're retired by then, which could mean less tax on those benefits.
0 coins
Astrid Bergström
•Thank you for explaining this. Do you know how much of a difference that 4.4% reduction would make monthly? I'm trying to calculate if waiting those extra months is worth it. Also, if I claim survivor benefits at FRA, can I still let my own benefit grow until 70?
0 coins
Omar Farouk
i went thru this 2 yrs ago. definetly wait till FRA for survivors!! the tax hit is BAD with high income. my accountant showed me i was only keeping like 55 cents on the dollar with the SS tax + regular income tax when I tried taking it early. not worth it!!
0 coins
Astrid Bergström
•Thanks for sharing your experience! That's exactly what I'm worried about - getting hit with taxes that eat up most of the benefit. Did you end up waiting until your FRA?
0 coins
Chloe Martin
The taxation of Social Security benefits follows specific thresholds. For individual filers, if your combined income (adjusted gross income + nontaxable interest + half of SS benefits) exceeds $34,000, up to 85% of benefits become taxable. At your income level, you'd definitely hit this threshold. Yes, you can absolutely claim survivor benefits at FRA and then switch to your own retirement benefit at 70. This is called a "restricted application" strategy and it's still available for survivor benefits (though it was eliminated for spousal benefits for people born after 1/1/1954). If maximizing lifetime benefits is your goal, and your own benefit will be significantly higher at age 70, this approach makes mathematical sense. The survivor benefit essentially provides "free money" between your FRA and age 70 while your own benefit continues growing by 8% per year until 70.
0 coins
Omar Farouk
•this is what i did exactly!! took survivors at my FRA (66+2mo) and letting my own grow. my own will be about $700 more per month at 70 than survivors
0 coins
Diego Fernández
DONT LISTEN TO THESE PEOPLE!! You should take survivor benefits NOW!!! Money now is better than money later - what if something happens and you never get to collect?? My sister waited and then got sick and missed out on THOUSANDS she could have had. The SSA people wont tell you this but its better to claim right away!!!!
0 coins
PixelPrincess
•While I understand your concern, this advice doesn't consider the tax implications the OP specifically asked about. With her high income, taking benefits now could result in significantly more tax than waiting until FRA or when her income is lower. Everyone's situation is different, and what happened with your sister (which I'm very sorry about) doesn't necessarily apply here.
0 coins
Anastasia Kuznetsov
My mom was in a similar situation last year. She tried for WEEKS to get through to SSA to discuss these exact questions about survivor benefits taxation. So frustrating. She finally used a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) which got her connected to a real SSA agent in about 20 minutes instead of waiting on hold for hours. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU The SSA agent told her that in her case, waiting until FRA for survivor benefits made more sense tax-wise since she was still working full-time with good income. Once she got concrete numbers for her specific situation, the decision became much clearer.
0 coins
Astrid Bergström
•Thank you for the suggestion! I've been dreading the phone call tomorrow, especially after my neighbor said she was on hold for over 2 hours last month. I'll check out that service if I have trouble getting through.
0 coins
Sean Fitzgerald
my condolences on your husband. i get ssi disability not regular ss so idk about the taxes but just wanted to say sorry for your loss
0 coins
Astrid Bergström
•That's very kind, thank you. It's been a difficult year figuring out all these financial details on top of everything else.
0 coins
Zara Khan
I think everyone's missing something important here - the earnings test! Before FRA, if you earn over $21,240 in 2023, they withhold $1 in benefits for every $2 you earn above that limit. With your income, they'd withhold pretty much ALL of your survivor benefit anyway until you reach FRA. So the tax question is kinda moot since you wouldn't even get the money until FRA anyway due to your earnings. Ask the SSA rep specifically about this tomorrow. The earnings test disappears at FRA, which is another huge reason to wait in your case.
0 coins
Chloe Martin
•Great point about the earnings test. In 2025, with the OP's income level (assuming similar earnings), the SSA would indeed withhold most if not all survivor benefits if claimed before FRA. This absolutely strengthens the case for waiting until FRA in December 2025. And just to clarify for the thread, the 2025 earnings limit will likely be higher than the $21,240 mentioned (it's adjusted annually for inflation), but the principle remains valid - high earners before FRA face significant withholding.
0 coins
Astrid Bergström
•Oh! I completely forgot about the earnings test! That definitely changes things - seems like waiting until FRA is the obvious choice now. Thanks for pointing this out!
0 coins
Diego Fernández
I think you all are making this WAY more complicated than it needs to be. Just take the survivor benefits now AND keep working. Then when you hit 70, switch to your own benefit. That way you get the most money overall. My financial advisor told me Social Security is all about getting the most money over your lifetime.
0 coins
Zara Khan
•Your financial advisor gave you incomplete information. With the OP's income level ($78,720/year), the earnings test would withhold approximately $28,740 of benefits annually if claimed before FRA. Essentially, she wouldn't receive ANY survivor benefits until reaching FRA anyway. So claiming early literally gets her $0 additional dollars while potentially creating administrative headaches. This is why understanding the complete picture matters.
0 coins
PixelPrincess
To summarize the excellent points made here: 1. Due to the earnings test, with your income level, you'd have most or all survivor benefits withheld until you reach FRA anyway 2. Waiting until FRA means you get 100% of your husband's benefit amount versus a reduced amount now 3. You can take survivor benefits at FRA and then switch to your own higher benefit at 70 (this is still allowed) 4. When you eventually collect survivor benefits, they'll be taxed based on your overall income; potentially less tax impact if your income is lower by then Given these factors, waiting until FRA to apply for survivor benefits appears to be the optimal strategy in your specific situation.
0 coins
Astrid Bergström
•Thank you for this clear summary! This has been incredibly helpful. I'm going to ask specifically about the earnings test during my call tomorrow and confirm that the restricted application for survivor benefits will still allow my own benefit to grow until 70. I really appreciate everyone's input!
0 coins