< Back to Social Security Administration

Social Security retirement filing strategy at FRA - husband filing now, wife waiting until 70?

Our retirement situation seems straightforward but I'm second-guessing myself about the earnings limits and spousal benefits! My wife and I both hit our full retirement age (FRA) of 66 this month (January 2025). I've been temporarily out of work for about 3 months and considering starting my SS retirement benefits now, but I'm still actively job hunting. If I understand correctly, since I'll be at FRA for all of 2025, I can earn unlimited income without any reduction in benefits? Is that right? Here's our numbers and situation: - My SS benefit if I file now at 66 (FRA): $2,071/month - Wife's benefit if she filed now at 66 (FRA): $1,794/month - Wife's benefit if she waits until 70: $2,532/month My wife plans to continue working full-time for a few more years, potentially until 70 for the maximum benefit. I've read comments about spouses claiming each other's benefits if they're higher, but I don't understand how that works or if it applies to us. Can someone explain this spousal benefit option and whether we should consider it? Also, is there any downside to me filing now while still looking for work? If I get a job next month that pays well, will that affect my benefits at all since I'm at FRA? Thanks for any guidance - we're trying to make the smartest decision for our retirement income!

Owen Devar

•

You're correct about the earnings limit - once you reach your Full Retirement Age (FRA), there is NO limit on how much you can earn while receiving Social Security retirement benefits. The earnings test only applies before FRA. Regarding spousal benefits, it sounds like you're asking about claiming on each other's records. Here's how it works: When you file for retirement benefits, your spouse can potentially receive up to 50% of your Primary Insurance Amount (PIA) as a spousal benefit IF that amount is higher than their own retirement benefit. However, since both of you have substantial benefits on your own records, spousal benefits likely won't increase either of your payments. Your strategy of having one spouse claim at FRA while the other waits until 70 is often recommended by financial planners. It provides some income now while maximizing the higher earner's benefit, which becomes the survivor benefit when one spouse passes away. One thing to consider: Has either of you looked into filing a restricted application for spousal benefits only? This option was eliminated for most people by the 2015 law changes, but people born before January 2, 1954 (which you both were) can still use this strategy.

0 coins

Brooklyn Knight

•

Thank you! That's really helpful about the earnings limit. I wasn't fully confident about that despite reading about it. I'm not familiar with a "restricted application" - what exactly is that? Would it allow one of us to claim on the other's record while letting our own benefit grow until 70? That sounds like it could be advantageous but I've never heard anyone mention it before.

0 coins

Daniel Rivera

•

In your situation, the restricted application strategy might actually be worth looking into! Since you both were born before January 2, 1954, this could work well. Here's how: - You file for your retirement benefits at FRA - Your wife files a restricted application for SPOUSAL benefits only (she'd get 50% of your benefit while letting her OWN benefit continue to grow until 70) This way, you'd get your $2,071/month, and she'd get around $1,035/month (50% of your benefit) while her own benefit grows to $2,532 at age 70. When she turns 70, she switches to her own higher benefit. You're absolutely right about the earnings test - at FRA there are NO limits. You could make $200,000 next year and still get every penny of your Social Security benefit. That's one of the big advantages of waiting until FRA to file! And when one of you eventually passes away (hopefully many years from now), the surviving spouse will receive the higher of the two benefits as a survivor benefit. That's another reason why having at least one spouse wait until 70 is a smart move.

0 coins

Sophie Footman

•

Is this restrictd application thing really still availble?? I thought they got rid of all those claiming "loopholes" years ago. My neighbor tried to do something like this last year and SSA told him no way.

0 coins

Connor Rupert

•

Just wanted to 2nd what others are saying - you wont lose ANY benefits if you work after FRA, no matter how much $$ you make. My brother started his SS at 66 last yr and still works full time making about 85k, gets his full SS payment every month. But calling SSA to ask about that restricted application thing could take FOREVER. I tried calling them about a different issue last month and spent 3 hours on hold before getting disconnected. So frustrating!!

0 coins

Molly Hansen

•

If you need to talk to SSA about complex filing strategies like restricted applications, I'd recommend using Claimyr (claimyr.com). It got me through to a real person at SSA in under 20 minutes last month when I was dealing with my own retirement filing questions. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU For what it's worth, the restricted application strategy is definitely still available for those born before Jan 2, 1954. The SSA representative might need to check with a supervisor though, as many frontline reps aren't as familiar with this option since it only applies to a shrinking group of people now.

0 coins

Brady Clean

•

YOUR WIFE SHOULD ABSOLUTELY FILE A RESTRICTED APPLICATION!!! This is one of the last great "secrets" in Social Security planning and most people miss out on it. The government tried to eliminate this with the 2015 law but people in your birth year were grandfathered in. I did this exact strategy with my wife last year. I filed for my regular benefit, she filed restricted for spousal only (got half my amount) and is letting her own benefit grow until 70. We're getting an extra $15,000+ over 4 years this way that we would have missed if we didn't know about this! Just be prepared when you go to the SS office - MANY of their employees don't understand this rule or will tell you it's not possible. You may need to speak with a supervisor or bring the actual rule in writing. Don't give up!

0 coins

Brooklyn Knight

•

That's amazing - thank you for sharing your experience! We'll definitely look into the restricted application option. Do you remember what forms your wife had to fill out or what specifically she had to say when applying? I want to make sure we get this right.

0 coins

Skylar Neal

•

um i think some of yall are confused about this restricted app thing?? my mom tried this and they told her it only works if you were born before 1954 AND you haven't filed for your own benefits yet. if you already filed for your own retirement you can't do it. just saying so nobody gets disappointed

0 coins

Owen Devar

•

You're absolutely right about the requirements - to use the restricted application strategy: 1. You must have been born before January 2, 1954 2. You must be at or past your Full Retirement Age (FRA) 3. You cannot have filed for your own retirement benefits previously 4. Your spouse must have already filed for their retirement benefits In the original poster's case, his wife meets all these criteria as long as she hasn't already filed for her own benefits. She was born before 1954, is at FRA, and her husband is planning to file for his benefits.

0 coins

Brady Clean

•

I looked more closly at your numbers, and if your wife can get half of your benefit while letting hers grow, she'd get about $1,035/month now PLUS her full benefit of $2,532 at age 70. Thats potentially an extra $50,000+ over 4 years that SSA definitely won't volunteer information about!!! BTW, I tried calling SSA about this FIVE TIMES and got disconnected each time before using Claimyr to get through. The rep who finally helped me actually had to go ask a supervisor about the restricted application because she wasn't familiar with it. Don't assume the first person you talk to knows about this option!

0 coins

Sophie Footman

•

This sounds too good to be true lol. Are you SURE the govt allows this?? And does the spouse filing restricted have to stop working or can they still work full time?

0 coins

Owen Devar

•

To answer a few questions that have come up in this thread: 1. Yes, the restricted application strategy is absolutely still available, but ONLY for people born before January 2, 1954. This was specifically preserved when Congress changed the rules in 2015. 2. For someone using this strategy, there is NO earnings test after FRA. So the wife in this scenario could continue working full-time with no reduction in spousal benefits as long as she's at or past her FRA. 3. To file a restricted application, you would specifically need to state that you are "restricting the scope of your application to spousal benefits only." This exact language is important. Form SSA-1-BK is used, but the key is making that specific restriction clear. 4. This works because of a provision called "deemed filing" that was changed in 2015 but grandfathered certain birth years. For people born before 1954, deemed filing only applies before FRA. The OP's situation is actually a textbook case of when this strategy works perfectly.

0 coins

Brooklyn Knight

•

Thank you so much for this detailed explanation! We're going to try this strategy. My wife will continue working while collecting the spousal benefit on my record until she turns 70, then switch to her own higher benefit. This forum has been incredibly helpful - we had no idea this option existed!

0 coins

Daniel Rivera

•

One last point regarding your strategy: when you pass away (hopefully many decades from now), your wife will receive the higher of the two benefits as a survivor benefit. So by having her wait until 70 to claim her own retirement benefits, you're also potentially maximizing her future survivor benefit. This is especially important since women typically outlive men by several years. The restricted application strategy you're considering provides: 1. Your full benefit now when you need it 2. Extra spousal income for your wife while her benefit grows 3. A maximized benefit for your wife at 70 4. A maximized survivor benefit for your wife if you predecease her It's really an optimal approach for your birth years and situation.

0 coins

Sophie Footman

•

Well dang i wish i knew about all this before i filed last year! No one at the social security office mentioned any of these strategies to me, they just had me sign the papers and that was it. Feels like they should tell people about these options!

0 coins

TaxRefund AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
6,689 users helped today