< Back to Social Security Administration

Social Security reps gave me incorrect information that would've cost me $14,500 - always verify!

Just had to share my experience with getting different answers from SSA representatives about my widow's benefits. I applied in March 2025 after my husband passed away last December. The first rep I spoke with told me I couldn't receive widow's benefits until I turned 60 (I'm 57) even though I'm caring for our 15-year-old son. She insisted that the "care of child" provision only applied if the child was under 16 AND disabled. I knew this didn't sound right based on what I'd read, so I asked to speak with a supervisor. The supervisor immediately confirmed I WAS eligible for widow's benefits while caring for a child under 16, regardless of disability status. That mistake would've cost me approximately $14,500 in missed benefits over the next year! This wasn't some obscure rule - it's basic eligibility information any SSA representative should know. I'm not trying to bash SSA employees, but PLEASE double-check any information you receive, especially if it means losing benefits. Ask for supervisors, get second opinions, or bring documentation of the rules. Has anyone else encountered wrong information from SSA?

100% this! I had almost the EXACT same experience but with retirement benefits. Rep told me I couldn't file a restricted application for spousal benefits only (I'm from the pre-2000 eligible birth cohort), but when I spoke to a supervisor, they confirmed I absolutely could. Would have lost out on $800/month for 4 years! I've found Claimyr really helpful for getting through to actual SSA representatives quickly when you need to verify information. Their service at claimyr.com lets you skip the hold times (which can be 2+ hours). They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU. Worth it when you need answers fast or want to double-check information with different representatives.

0 coins

Thank you for sharing your experience! That's a huge amount of money you could have lost. I'll definitely look into that service. The hold times are absolutely ridiculous these days - I was on hold for 1.5 hours before I even got to speak with the first representative who gave me the wrong information.

0 coins

As a former SSA employee (retired in 2022), I can explain why this happens. Most field office reps are generalists handling everything from cards to benefits. The training is inadequate, and policies change constantly. Mother's/father's benefits and widow(er)'s benefits with a child in care are commonly misunderstood. The correct rule is that you can receive widow's benefits at ANY age if you're caring for the deceased worker's child who is under 16 OR disabled. No requirement for both conditions. I always tell people to check the SSA website (specifically Publication No. 05-10084) and bring it with you to appointments.

0 coins

is it possible to apply for these benefits online or do you have 2 go into the office? my sister just lost her husband and has 2 kids (12 and 14) and doesnt know where to start

0 coins

Demi Hall

THIS!!! I was told by THREE different reps that I couldn't receive disability benefits because I hadn't worked in the last 5 years. Turns out I was still within my disability insured period because I had 25+ years of work before becoming disabled. Finally found a knowledgeable rep who actually looked at my FULL work history instead of just the recent years. Was approved and received $29K in backpay that I almost lost because of bad info!

0 coins

That's awful but I'm so glad you finally got someone who knew what they were doing. I wonder how many people just accept the first answer they get and lose out on benefits they've earned.

0 coins

i think some SSA workers just make stuff up when they dont know the answer lol. i was told i couldnt get survivors benefits for my kids because their dad and i were divorced when he died. turns out thats completely false, kids can get benefits regardless of the parents marital status as long as the parent was insured. ended up getting benefits for both my children after i insisted on talking to someone else.

0 coins

This is exactly why I recommend everyone read SSA's own publications before any appointment or call. The eligibility rules are clearly spelled out. For survivor benefits with children, see Publication No. 05-10084. For disability, No. 05-10029. For retirement, No. 05-10035. These are freely available on SSA.gov and explain in plain language who qualifies. Print them and highlight the relevant sections before your appointment.

0 coins

When my husband passed away in January, I had a similar situation but the opposite problem. The first representative told me I could get widow's benefits at age 50 (I'm 49) because I have a medical condition. But when I went to apply, a different representative clarified that early widow's benefits at 50 only apply if you meet the disability definition, not just having a general medical condition. I appreciate the second rep's honesty—it prevented me from applying for something I wasn't eligible for and potentially facing an overpayment later. So sometimes the more restrictive answer is actually correct! It's so confusing trying to navigate all these rules during an already difficult time.

0 coins

That's a really good point. Getting incorrect information works both ways. I'm sorry for your loss and hope you're doing okay. The whole system is just so complex that even their own employees struggle with it.

0 coins

my mom had this happen with medicare!! they told her that she didnt need to sign up for part b when she retired at 66 because she had health insurance from my dads work. But they didnt ask how big his company was, and it turns out you DO need to sign up if the company has less than 20 employees!! she got hit with a HUGE late enrollment penalty that follows her for life :

0 coins

You're absolutely right - this is one of the most common Medicare enrollment mistakes. For anyone reading: if you're covered by an employer plan for a company with fewer than 20 employees when you turn 65, Medicare becomes your primary insurance and you MUST enroll in Part B to avoid penalties and coverage gaps. This is a perfect example of why verifying information is so important.

0 coins

I'd like to add some practical advice for anyone dealing with SSA: 1. Always get the name and direct extension (if possible) of any representative you speak with 2. Ask them to add detailed notes to your file about the information they provided 3. Request written confirmation of eligibility decisions when possible 4. If applying for a benefit with specific rules, print the relevant SSA publication and bring it with you 5. If you feel the information is incorrect, politely ask, "Could you show me where that policy is written?" 6. Request to speak with a Technical Expert (TE) or supervisor for complex situations 7. Consider scheduling an appointment rather than walking in - you're more likely to see someone with experience The system is complex, and even well-meaning representatives make mistakes.

0 coins

Demi Hall

Great list! I'd add one more: RECORD EVERYTHING! Most states allow you to record calls if one party (you) knows it's being recorded. I started doing this after getting contradictory info multiple times. When I mentioned having our previous conversation recorded to a rep who told me something different, suddenly they were much more willing to double-check policies.

0 coins

I feel like this is becoming more common with all the experienced SSA staff retiring. My neighbor worked there for 30+ years and said they're losing institutional knowledge faster than they can train new people. When I had issues getting through on the phone to verify some benefit calculation questions, I used claimyr.com to connect with an agent (worked great, and I didn't have to wait on hold forever). The first agent gave me one answer, so I called back later using the service again and got a completely different answer from another agent. The third agent finally had the correct information that matched what the SSA website said. If I hadn't been persistent, I would have made decisions based on incorrect information.

0 coins

That persistence really paid off for you! And I think you're right about the loss of experienced staff. The woman who eventually helped me mentioned she'd been there for 22 years, and she knew the answer immediately without having to look anything up.

0 coins

sometimes i wonder if its on purpose tbh. my uncle was told he wasnt eligible for retirement benefits because he didnt have enough credits. turns out they were only looking at his us work record and completely ignored the fact that wed moved from canada and there's a totalization agreement. he was eligible after all but missed out on almost a year of payments because of bad info.

0 coins

International agreements are one of the most misunderstood aspects of Social Security. There are 30 countries with totalization agreements that allow workers to combine credits. Representatives should always ask about foreign work when someone is close to but not meeting the 40 credits requirement. This is a perfect example of specialized knowledge that many generalists at SSA might not be familiar with.

0 coins

TaxRefund AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
6,606 users helped today