Social Security early retirement at 62 - what percentage of FRA benefits will I actually get?
Been trying to figure out my retirement plans and I'm seriously considering taking SS at 62 instead of waiting til my full retirement age. Problem is, I can't seem to get a straight answer about exactly what percentage of my full benefit I'll receive if I claim early. I think it's around 70% but I've seen different numbers online. Does anyone know the exact percentage reduction for claiming at 62 compared to FRA? And does the reduction change depending on what year you were born? Thanks in advance for any help!
22 comments


Jamal Harris
The exact percentage depends on your birth year since Full Retirement Age (FRA) varies. For most people retiring now, FRA is 66 and some months, or 67. If your FRA is 67, filing at 62 gives you 70% of your full benefit. If FRA is 66, you'd get about 75% at age 62. The reduction is approximately 5/9 of 1% for each month before FRA (up to 36 months) and 5/12 of 1% for each additional month beyond 36 months early.
0 coins
Zoe Stavros
•Thanks! I was born in 1963 so my FRA is 67. So looks like I'm at the 70% level if I take it at 62. That's a pretty big cut but waiting 5 extra years is tough too.
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
My brother took his at 62 last year and he only got 71% i think. But he needed the money right away so didn't have much choice. Every situation is diffrent!
0 coins
Mei Wong
•Did your brother factor in that his benefits would be reduced even further if he was still working? The earnings test can really bite you if you claim early but are still earning income above the threshold ($22,320 in 2025). For every $2 earned above that limit, SSA deducts $1 from benefits. Just something to consider if the original poster is planning to keep working.
0 coins
Liam Sullivan
The reduction is PERMANENT don't forget!!! A lot of people think they can take it early and then somehow get the full amount later but YOU CAN'T! I made this mistake and regret it every single month when I get my check. If you can possibly wait until your FRA, DO IT!!! Even better if you can wait until 70 - that's a 24% INCREASE over your FRA amount. Social Security is one of the few guaranteed lifetime income sources with inflation protection...don't shortchange yourself if you don't absolutely need the money at 62.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
•Not everyone lives long enough to make waiting worth it! My husband waited and only collected for 8 months before he passed away. Sometimes bird in hand is better than two in bush.
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
Let me clarify a few things since there's some confusion in the responses: 1. For someone born in 1963 (as you mentioned in a comment), your FRA is indeed 67 and claiming at 62 means you'll receive exactly 70% of your Primary Insurance Amount (PIA). 2. The reduction follows a specific formula: 5/9% reduction per month for the first 36 months before FRA, and 5/12% reduction per month for months beyond that. So the total reduction for 60 months early (67 to 62) is 30%. 3. This reduction is permanent, but there's one exception: if you claim early, then withdraw your application within 12 months, repay all benefits received, and reapply later. But this is a one-time option. 4. Consider your life expectancy, other income sources, and immediate needs when making this decision. The break-even age (where waiting for FRA equals total benefits from claiming early) is usually in your early 80s. Hope this helps with your planning!
0 coins
Zoe Stavros
•This is super helpful, thanks! I didn't know about that withdrawal option. My health is pretty good so I'll probably live into my 80s based on family history, but I'm really concerned about having enough money in the next few years. Tough decision.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
Been trying to call SSA for WEEKS to ask this exact question! Always disconnected or hours of waiting. So frustrating!!! Has anyone found a way to actually talk to a real person there?
0 coins
Jamal Harris
•I had the same problem trying to get through about my survivor benefits. Finally used a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that got me connected to an agent in about 20 minutes instead of waiting for hours. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU. It saved me so much frustration since I had already tried calling for days with no luck.
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
my sister says if u take it at 62 you only get like 65% but idk if thats right cause my neighbor got more than that i think
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
•Your sister might be confusing the reduction percentages. No one gets as low as 65% of their FRA benefit at age 62. The minimum is 70% (for those with FRA of 67). For older individuals with an FRA of 66, they'd get 75% at age 62. The exact percentage depends on your birth year.
0 coins
Liam Sullivan
ALSO remember that if you're married, taking it early impacts SURVIVOR BENEFITS too!! If you're the higher earner and you take reduced benefits, your spouse might get lower survivor benefits if you pass away first. My husband took his early and now I'm stuck with his reduced benefit for the rest of my life since he passed. THINK LONG TERM!!!
0 coins
Amara Okafor
•That's so true and people don't talk about it enough. Sorry about your husband. I'm in a similar situation.
0 coins
Mei Wong
I've been wrestling with this same decision. What complicates things for me is the earnings test while working. I plan to keep working part-time until 65, and if I claim at 62, I'll lose some benefits due to the earnings limit ($22,320 for 2025). However, once I reach FRA, SSA will adjust my benefit amount to account for months where benefits were withheld. Another factor to consider is that taking benefits at 62 might mean you pay taxes on Social Security for more years if you're still working with substantial income. Up to 85% of benefits can be taxable depending on your combined income. Anyone know if the recalculation at FRA for benefits withheld due to the earnings test fully makes up for the early claiming reduction?
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
•The recalculation at FRA doesn't eliminate the early claiming reduction entirely. What happens is that SSA will adjust your benefit to give you credit for the months your benefits were completely withheld due to the earnings test. For example, if you claimed at 62 but had 12 months of benefits completely withheld due to earnings, at FRA they would recalculate as if you had claimed at 63 instead of 62. So you'd get a slightly higher percentage, but still less than your full FRA amount.
0 coins
Zoe Stavros
Thanks everyone for the information! Based on your advice, I'm thinking more carefully about this decision. One more question - does anyone know if delaying affects COLA increases? Like if I take reduced benefits now, do I also get reduced COLA adjustments going forward?
0 coins
Jamal Harris
•COLA increases are percentage-based, so they apply proportionally to whatever your benefit amount is. So yes, if you take reduced benefits at 62, your COLA increases will be calculated on that smaller amount. For example, with a 3% COLA, someone receiving $1,000 would get a $30 increase, while someone receiving $1,400 would get a $42 increase. This compounds over time, making the gap between early and delayed claiming grow larger each year with inflation.
0 coins
Logan Chiang
One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is that you can use the Social Security Administration's online benefit calculators to get personalized estimates. If you create a my Social Security account at ssa.gov, you can see exactly what your estimated monthly benefit would be at different claiming ages (62, FRA, 70) based on your actual earnings record. This takes the guesswork out of the percentages since it shows you real dollar amounts. The calculators also factor in future earnings if you plan to keep working. I found this really helpful when I was making my decision - seeing the actual monthly dollar difference between claiming at 62 vs waiting made the trade-offs much clearer than just thinking about percentages.
0 coins
Nia Watson
•This is excellent advice! I just created my account and wow, seeing the actual dollar amounts really puts it in perspective. The difference between $1,960 at 62 vs $2,800 at 67 is stark when you see it in black and white. The online calculator also showed me how continuing to work for a few more years could increase my benefit amount since it replaces lower earning years in my calculation. Definitely recommend anyone considering early retirement do this first before making the decision.
0 coins
Jessica Nguyen
Just wanted to add something that helped me make this decision - consider doing a break-even analysis with your specific numbers. I calculated that if I take benefits at 62 ($1,400/month) versus waiting until 67 ($2,000/month), I'd collect about $84,000 by age 67 from early claiming. Then it would take about 14 years (until age 81) for the higher monthly payments to make up that difference. Since women in my family tend to live into their late 80s, waiting made sense for me. But if you have health concerns or immediate financial needs, that calculation might look different. Also factor in what you'd do with that money - if you can invest the early payments and earn a decent return, it changes the math. The key is running the numbers with your actual benefit estimates rather than just thinking about percentages.
0 coins
Alice Fleming
•This break-even analysis approach is really smart! I hadn't thought about factoring in potential investment returns on the early payments. That's a good point that if you could invest that $84,000 over 5 years and get decent returns, it might change the calculation significantly. Do you happen to know what kind of return rate would make taking early benefits mathematically better than waiting? I'm trying to run similar numbers for my situation but I'm not sure what's a realistic assumption for investment returns over that timeframe.
0 coins