< Back to Social Security Administration

Social Security benefit increase from 62 to FRA - is it different than FRA to 70?

I'm trying to figure out the best time to claim my SS retirement benefits. I've heard that benefits grow by 8% per year if you wait from your full retirement age (67 for me) until 70. But I'm confused about the growth rate between 62 and my FRA. Is it also 8% per year during that period? Or is it calculated differently? My financial advisor mentioned something about 'actuarial reduction' before FRA versus 'delayed retirement credits' after FRA, but I didn't fully understand the difference. Can someone explain how the percentages work in both periods?

No its not the same! The reduction from 62 to FRA is about 5-6% per year, not 8%. And its not exactly the same each year either. I think its actually calculated monthly by some weird formula.

0 coins

Thanks for responding! So it's a lower percentage before FRA than after? That's helpful to know. Do you happen to know why they use different rates?

0 coins

Your financial advisor was using the correct terminology. The growth from FRA to 70 is called 'delayed retirement credits' and is exactly 8% per year (or 2/3% per month). However, the reduction from FRA back to 62 is calculated using 'actuarial reduction factors' which are approximately 5/9% per month for the first 36 months before FRA (about 6.67% per year) and 5/12% per month for months beyond that (about 5% per year). For someone with an FRA of 67, claiming at 62 results in a total reduction of about 30% from your FRA benefit amount. This is different from the straight 8% per year increase after FRA. The difference exists because they're based on different calculations - the early reduction is actuarially determined based on average lifespan, while the delayed credits are specifically designed as incentives to encourage later claiming.

0 coins

Thank you for such a detailed explanation! So if my FRA benefit would be $2,500, then at 62 I'd get about $1,750 (30% less), but at 70 I'd get $3,500 (40% more)? That's a huge difference from earliest to latest claiming age.

0 coins

I was TOTALLY confused about this too when I was deciding when to claim!!! the SSA website explains it but its super confusing. The thing that helped me understand was going to my local office and having someone show me the EXACT numbers for MY situation. Every time I tried calling I got disconnected after waiting FOREVER!!!

0 coins

I had the same experience trying to call SSA - the wait times are ridiculous! I eventually found this service called Claimyr that gets you through to a live SSA agent in minutes instead of hours. Check out their demo video at https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU - their website is claimyr.com. It saved me so much frustration when I needed to figure out my benefit calculation details. They connected me directly to an agent who pulled up my earnings record and gave me my exact benefit amounts at different ages.

0 coins

My sister and I are both retiring soon and we were just talking about this! She's taking her benefits at 62 even though they're reduced because she needs the money now. I'm waiting till 67 because I'm still working part time. Everybody's situation is different!

0 coins

That's a good point - it really does depend on individual circumstances. I'm trying to figure out if I should keep working a few more years or retire early. The benefit difference is significant!

0 coins

Another important factor to consider is that the reduction before FRA affects your benefit permanently. Some people mistakenly believe that if they claim at 62, their benefit will automatically increase to the full amount when they reach their FRA - but that's not the case. The reduction is permanent (except for any COLA increases that would apply to all beneficiaries). Also, if you're still working while collecting early benefits, you may be subject to the earnings test, which temporarily withholds benefits if you earn above certain thresholds ($22,320 in 2025 for those under FRA). Once you reach FRA, your benefit would be recalculated to give credit for months when benefits were withheld. Finally, the decision impacts survivor benefits as well. If you're married, waiting until 70 not only maximizes your retirement benefit but also potentially maximizes what your surviving spouse could receive if you pass away first.

0 coins

I didn't realize the reduction was permanent! And I definitely hadn't considered the survivor benefit angle - my spouse is 5 years younger than me, so that's an important factor. Thank you for pointing that out!

0 coins

i claimed at 62 and now i regret it so much!! wish i had waited. im getting almost $800 less each month than if i waited till my FRA. think carefully about your decision!!

0 coins

You know you can pay back all the benefits you've received and withdraw your application within 12 months of filing? Then its like you never filed and you can restart later. But you gotta pay back EVERYTHING you received.

0 coins

As a final note, the SSA provides calculators on their website that can show you your estimated benefit amounts at different claiming ages. These estimates are based on your actual earnings record. You can also schedule an appointment with an SSA representative who can walk you through your specific options. The decision of when to claim is highly personal and depends on factors like your health, family longevity, current financial needs, other income sources, and marital status. There's no one-size-fits-all answer, but understanding the exact percentage increases and reductions helps you make an informed choice.

0 coins

Thank you all for your helpful responses! This has given me a much clearer understanding of how the different rates work. I'll definitely use the SSA calculators and consider scheduling an appointment to discuss my specific situation. The difference between claiming at 62 versus 70 is much more significant than I realized.

0 coins

TaxRefund AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
6,679 users helped today