Social Security Family Maximum confusion with disabled adult child and child-in-care spousal benefits - smaller payments than expected
I'm really confused about our family benefit situation and hoping someone can clarify the Family Maximum rules. My husband (64) started collecting his reduced retirement benefits last year. I'm 61 and caring for our disabled son who's 26 and has been disabled since childhood. I recently applied for Child-in-Care spousal benefits on my husband's record, and we also filed for our son to receive Disabled Adult Child (DAC) benefits. Both applications were approved, but the monthly amounts are WAY lower than we expected! We thought each would be close to 50% of my husband's PIA, but they're significantly less. I think we're hitting the Family Maximum Benefit limit, but I'm confused about how this works. My questions are: 1) Is my husband's own retirement benefit counted as part of the Family Maximum cap? 2) If yes, is it his full PIA amount that counts toward the cap, or just his actual reduced benefit amount since he filed early? We're trying to budget for ongoing care expenses for our son, and the difference of several hundred dollars monthly is really significant for us. Any insights on how the Family Maximum works in this situation?
37 comments


Lucas Turner
Yes, the Family Maximum Benefit (FMB) is definitely what's affecting your benefits here. To answer your questions directly: 1) Yes, your husband's retirement benefit DOES count against the Family Maximum calculation 2) It's his actual reduced benefit amount that counts, not his PIA The FMB is typically between 150-180% of the worker's PIA. Since your husband took benefits early, his reduced amount counts toward this cap, but the cap itself is still calculated based on his PIA. This often creates a situation where auxiliary beneficiaries (you and your son) receive less than you might expect. Have you considered whether you might qualify for benefits on your own record instead? That wouldn't be subject to the family maximum on your husband's record.
0 coins
Eleanor Foster
•Thank you for the clear explanation. I do have my own work record, but my PIA would be significantly lower than my husband's. I was hoping the child-in-care benefit would be more substantial while we wait until I reach my FRA. So if I understand correctly, the cap is based on his PIA, but his actual reduced benefit counts against that cap, leaving less room for our benefits. That seems so unfair! Is there any way to appeal this calculation?
0 coins
Kai Rivera
had the SAME ISSUE with my grandkids!!! the family max is a KILLER and they dont explain it well at all!! the social security people never mentioned it to me until AFTER everything was approved and the checks started coming. so frustrating!!!
0 coins
Eleanor Foster
•It really is frustrating! Did you find any way to get a clearer explanation or increase the benefits? I feel like we're being penalized for my husband taking his retirement early, even though we had no choice with our son's care needs.
0 coins
Anna Stewart
I'd like to add a bit more technical detail on how the Family Maximum Benefit (FMB) calculation works, as it can be confusing. The FMB formula has four "bend points" and is calculated using the worker's Primary Insurance Amount (PIA). It's typically between 150-188% of the worker's PIA, depending on their earning history. When a worker files early, their own reduced benefit is counted first against the maximum. Then, any remaining amount in the "family pool" is divided proportionally among auxiliary beneficiaries (your child-in-care spousal benefit and your son's disabled adult child benefit). So yes, your husband's benefit counts against the maximum, and it's his actual reduced amount that's counted. This leaves less in the family benefit pool to be divided between you and your son. To verify all this is correct, you should request a detailed explanation of your benefit calculation from your local SSA office. They can provide a breakdown showing exactly how the FMB was applied in your specific situation.
0 coins
Layla Sanders
•wait i thought disabled children wernt subject to the family maximum?? i read that somewhere i think. or maybe thats only if the child was disabled before 22?? so confused by all these rules!!
0 coins
Anna Stewart
•That's a common misconception. Disabled Adult Children (DAC) benefits ARE subject to the Family Maximum just like other auxiliary benefits. You might be thinking of SSI (Supplemental Security Income), which is a different program and isn't affected by the Family Maximum. As long as the disability began before age 22 (which appears to be the case here), the son qualifies as a DAC on the parent's record, but these benefits are still subject to the FMB limits.
0 coins
Morgan Washington
The whole benefits system is DESIGNED to be confusing and shortchange families! I went through something similar when my sister's disability benefits were cut because my dad started collecting. We never got a straight answer from anyone at SS and spent hours on hold only to be told different things by different agents. The whole system seems rigged to pay out as little as possible to families.
0 coins
Eleanor Foster
•It really does feel that way sometimes! Each time I've called, I get slightly different explanations. One rep told me it was because of the child-in-care provision, another mentioned the family maximum, and a third just said it was "policy" without further details. So frustrating!
0 coins
Kaylee Cook
I dealt with a similar situation last year. One thing that helped me was calling SSA directly to get a detailed breakdown of the Family Maximum calculation. However, I spent 3 weeks trying to reach someone who could actually explain it properly! I finally had success using Claimyr (claimyr.com) to get through to an SSA agent quickly. Their service connected me to SSA without the usual 2+ hour wait. Totally worth checking out their video demo (https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU) to see how it works. The agent I reached was able to provide a complete breakdown of how our family maximum was calculated and even found a small error in my son's benefit amount that was later corrected. Regarding your situation, I'd specifically ask for a "PEBES query" which shows the breakdowns of the PIA and family maximum calculations. Sometimes seeing the actual numbers helps make sense of why the benefits are lower than expected.
0 coins
Eleanor Foster
•Thank you! I hadn't heard of the PEBES query before - I'll definitely ask for that. And I appreciate the Claimyr suggestion. I've been trying to get through on the phone for days with no luck. It's worth trying something different at this point because I need actual answers, not more confusion.
0 coins
Oliver Alexander
•the claimyr thing really works i used it last month when my payments stopped suddenly. got through in 15 minutes instead of waiting all day!
0 coins
Lara Woods
So Im in a slightly different but similar situation with disabled adult son and understanding the family maximum. Husband can file in 2 years and I'm wondering if we should delay his filing to maximize benefits for our son. Does anyone know if delaying the primary earner's benefits affects how much the disabled adult child would get, or is DAC benefit always 50% of PIA regardless of when primary files?
0 coins
Lucas Turner
•Great question, and something the original poster might want to consider too. The DAC benefit is based on 50% of the worker's PIA if the worker is alive (75% if deceased). However, if multiple people are collecting on one record, the Family Maximum will still apply. The key difference with delaying is that when the primary worker delays claiming past Full Retirement Age, they earn Delayed Retirement Credits which increase their benefit above their PIA. Importantly, these Delayed Retirement Credits do NOT increase the Family Maximum, which remains based on the worker's PIA. However, if the primary worker is receiving more, that leaves less of the family maximum "pool" for others. If maximizing total family benefits is your goal, you'd need to calculate whether the increased benefit from delaying would outweigh the reduction to auxiliary benefits due to the family maximum. This is definitely a situation where professional advice might help, as the calculations can get quite complex.
0 coins
Kai Rivera
Whenever I call social security its a nightmare!!! waited 3 hours last time before I hung up. Anybody found a way to actually talk to a real person there without wasting your whole day??
0 coins
Kaylee Cook
•As I mentioned above, I had good results with Claimyr (claimyr.com). They got me through to an agent in about 10 minutes when I was dealing with my family maximum issue. They have a video that shows how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU Before that, I tried calling right when the office opened, calling different field offices, and even trying the 800 number at weird times like 4:30pm. Nothing worked until I tried this service.
0 coins
Eleanor Foster
Quick update after speaking with SSA (finally got through!): The agent confirmed that my husband's reduced benefit is counting against the Family Maximum, which is why our son's DAC benefit and my child-in-care spousal benefit are both reduced. The agent explained that the Family Maximum is approximately 175% of my husband's PIA in our case. Since he took retirement 2 years early, his benefit is reduced to about 87% of his PIA. This means our son and I are splitting the remaining portion of the maximum (about 88% of PIA), and it's being divided proportionally between us. I also learned that if I were to wait until my FRA to claim regular spousal benefits (not child-in-care), my benefit would increase, but our son's would decrease further to stay within the maximum. The whole system seems designed to keep families from receiving full benefits! Thank you all for your help in understanding this complex issue.
0 coins
Anna Stewart
•Thanks for sharing this update! Your situation perfectly illustrates how the Family Maximum works. The 175% figure is typical, and you've now seen firsthand how it impacts multiple beneficiaries. One thing to consider for the future: when you reach your own Full Retirement Age, you might want to run calculations on whether claiming on your own record might be more advantageous than the spousal benefit, especially given the FMB constraints. If you've had significant earnings, your own benefit might provide more than the restricted spousal benefit after the family maximum is applied. Best of luck with everything!
0 coins
Layla Sanders
•glad u figured it out! the system is way too complicated, even the agents get confused sometimes. my aunt got 3 different answers from 3 different people at ssa about her widows benefits!!
0 coins
Chloe Martin
I'm going through something very similar right now with my disabled daughter and the family maximum calculations. Your update was really helpful - it's frustrating how the system works against families who need the most support. One thing I discovered that might help you: some field offices have benefit counselors who specialize in disability cases and family maximum situations. They can sometimes provide clearer explanations than the general phone agents. You might want to ask specifically to speak with someone who handles DAC cases when you call. Also, make sure you keep detailed records of all your conversations with SSA, including the date, time, and agent name if possible. I've found that having this documentation helps when you get conflicting information from different representatives. The whole system definitely seems designed to minimize payouts to families, but at least now you understand why your benefits are lower than expected. Hang in there!
0 coins
Miguel Diaz
•Thank you for the suggestion about asking for a benefit counselor who specializes in DAC cases - that's really helpful! I didn't know those existed. I'll definitely try that next time I need to call. You're absolutely right about keeping detailed records. I started doing that after getting different answers from different agents, and it's already been useful when I had to call back to clarify something. It's unfortunate that we have to become our own advocates just to understand what we're entitled to. I hope your situation with your daughter gets resolved smoothly. It's comforting to know others are dealing with similar challenges, even though I wouldn't wish this confusion on anyone!
0 coins
Freya Nielsen
I'm also dealing with a similar family maximum situation and wanted to share something that might help others here. After reading through all these responses, I realized I should mention that there's actually a difference between how the family maximum applies to retirement benefits versus disability benefits. If your husband had filed for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) instead of early retirement, the family maximum calculation would be different - typically higher at around 85% of his PIA or 150% of his PIA, whichever is less. Since he filed for early retirement instead, you're subject to the standard retirement family maximum formula which tends to be more restrictive. I know this doesn't help your current situation since he's already filed for retirement, but it might be useful information for others reading this thread who are still deciding when to file. The timing and type of benefit filing can really impact the total family benefits available. Also, Eleanor, have you looked into whether your son might qualify for any state disability programs or services that could help offset some of the financial impact of the lower-than-expected Social Security benefits? Sometimes there are additional resources available that can help bridge the gap.
0 coins
Olivia Martinez
•This is really helpful information about the difference between SSDI and retirement benefits regarding family maximums! I had no idea that disability benefits had a more favorable family maximum calculation. It makes me wonder if we should have explored whether my husband might have qualified for SSDI before filing for early retirement, though I know that ship has sailed now. Regarding state programs, we've looked into a few things but haven't found much that we qualify for given our income level. Most programs seem to have pretty strict income limits, and even with the reduced Social Security benefits, we're still over the thresholds. It's frustrating because the gap between "too much income" for assistance and "enough income" to comfortably manage care costs is pretty significant. Thank you for sharing this information though - it's definitely something for other families to consider before making filing decisions. The more I learn about all these rules and calculations, the more I realize how important it is to get professional advice before making any major Social Security decisions.
0 coins
Paolo Ricci
I'm new to this community but dealing with a very similar situation, so I wanted to jump in and thank everyone for these detailed explanations. My wife and I are about to face this exact scenario - she's considering filing for early retirement at 62, and we have a disabled adult child who would qualify for DAC benefits. Reading through all of these responses has been incredibly eye-opening. I had no idea that the primary worker's reduced benefit counts against the family maximum, leaving less for auxiliary beneficiaries. This is definitely going to change our planning strategy. @Eleanor Foster - I really appreciate you sharing your experience and the follow-up after speaking with SSA. That breakdown of how the 175% family maximum gets divided really helps me understand what we might be looking at. One question for the group: Has anyone found any good resources or calculators that can help estimate family maximum impacts before filing? It seems like this is such an important factor that more families should understand before making their Social Security timing decisions.
0 coins
Diego Vargas
•Welcome to the community! Your situation sounds very familiar to what many of us are dealing with. Regarding calculators for family maximum impacts - I wish I had better news, but I haven't found any really good online calculators that accurately handle the complex family maximum scenarios, especially when you factor in early retirement reductions. The Social Security Administration's own online calculators don't seem to account for these situations very well. What I ended up doing was creating a simple spreadsheet based on the information I gathered from calling SSA multiple times. I used the family maximum formula (which varies but is typically 150-188% of PIA) and then subtracted the primary worker's actual benefit amount to see what would be left for auxiliary beneficiaries. One suggestion: before your wife files, you might want to schedule an appointment at your local SSA field office specifically to discuss the family maximum implications. Bring a list of questions and ask them to walk through the calculations with you. Some offices are more helpful than others, but it's worth trying to get the numbers before you're locked into a decision. Also, definitely consider the timing carefully - once she files for early retirement, you can't undo that decision, and as several people here have noted, it really does impact the total family benefits available. Good luck with your planning!
0 coins
Lucas Adams
I'm dealing with a related situation and wanted to add something that might be helpful for families navigating these decisions. After reading through everyone's experiences, I realized there's another aspect to consider: the impact of Medicare enrollment timing on your overall financial picture. When your husband reaches 65, he'll need to enroll in Medicare Part A (which is free if he has enough work credits) and consider Part B. The Medicare Part B premiums can be significant - around $174/month for most people in 2024, but higher if your income exceeds certain thresholds. Since you're dealing with reduced Social Security benefits due to the family maximum, these additional healthcare costs become even more important to factor into your budget planning. Also, for families with disabled adult children, there are some Medicare considerations too. Your son may qualify for Medicare after receiving SSDI for 24 months, which could help with some healthcare costs even if it doesn't directly address the Social Security benefit shortfall. I mention this because when we're already dealing with lower-than-expected Social Security benefits, every additional expense or potential savings becomes more significant. Have you factored Medicare costs into your care expense budgeting? Sometimes families focus so much on the Social Security calculations that they overlook how Medicare timing and costs will affect their overall situation.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
•That's a really important point about Medicare costs that I hadn't fully considered! We're still a year away from my husband turning 65, but you're absolutely right that the Medicare Part B premiums will add another significant expense to our budget just when our Social Security benefits are already lower than expected due to the family maximum. I hadn't thought about the Medicare implications for our son either. He's been receiving DAC benefits, but I need to check if that means he's also receiving SSDI and would qualify for Medicare after 24 months. That could potentially help with some of his ongoing medical expenses, which would free up some of our budget for other care costs. Do you know if there are any income-based programs that can help with Medicare Part B premiums? Given that our Social Security benefits are reduced due to the family maximum, I'm wondering if we might qualify for any assistance programs that we wouldn't have qualified for at the full benefit amounts. Thanks for bringing up this angle - it's yet another layer of complexity to navigate, but definitely something we need to plan for!
0 coins
Zara Rashid
Yes, there are several programs that can help with Medicare costs, especially for families dealing with reduced Social Security benefits like yours due to the family maximum! The main programs to look into are: **Medicare Savings Programs (MSP)**: These state-run programs can help pay Medicare Part B premiums and sometimes deductibles/copays. There are different levels (QMB, SLMB, QI) with varying income limits. Since your benefits are reduced due to the family maximum, you might qualify even if you wouldn't have at full benefit amounts. **Extra Help/Low Income Subsidy (LIS)**: This helps with Medicare Part D prescription drug costs and can provide significant savings. **Medicare Part B Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount (IRMAA)**: This works the opposite way - higher-income beneficiaries pay MORE for Part B, but it means if your income is lower due to the benefit reductions, you won't hit these higher premium tiers. Regarding your son - if he's receiving DAC benefits, he should also be getting SSDI, which means he'll qualify for Medicare after 24 months of SSDI payments. This is separate from turning 65 and can be a huge help with medical costs. I'd recommend contacting your State Health Insurance Assistance Program (SHIP) - they provide free counseling on Medicare options and can help you navigate these programs. Each state has one, and they're really knowledgeable about how all these benefits interact. The timing is good to start researching this now since you have a year to plan before your husband turns 65!
0 coins
Aaron Lee
•This is incredibly helpful information, thank you so much! I had no idea about Medicare Savings Programs or that they might take into account our reduced Social Security benefits due to the family maximum. It's encouraging to know that the very thing that's causing us financial stress (the lower benefits) might actually help us qualify for other assistance programs. I'm definitely going to look into our state's SHIP program - having free counseling to help navigate all these interconnected programs sounds invaluable. And you're right about the timing being good to start planning now. Your point about my son potentially getting Medicare through his SSDI eligibility is really important too. I need to clarify with SSA whether his DAC benefits also mean he's receiving SSDI payments that would start that 24-month clock. If so, that could significantly help with his medical expenses, which would be a huge relief for our budget. It's amazing how many different programs and rules all interact with each other. Every time I think I understand one piece of the puzzle, I discover there are more layers to consider. Thank you for sharing this knowledge - it gives me hope that there might be more assistance available than I originally thought!
0 coins
Anastasia Kuznetsov
•This is such valuable information about Medicare assistance programs! I'm in a similar situation with reduced benefits due to family maximum, and I had no idea these programs existed. One thing I wanted to add - when you contact SHIP, make sure to bring documentation of your actual Social Security benefit amounts (not just the estimated amounts). I learned this the hard way when applying for other assistance programs. They need to see the real numbers after the family maximum reductions are applied, not what the benefits would be without those limits. Also, for anyone else reading this - some states have additional programs beyond the federal Medicare Savings Programs. It's worth asking SHIP about state-specific assistance too. Every little bit helps when you're dealing with these reduced benefits! @Zara Rashid - do you know if the Medicare Savings Program income limits are based on gross income or net income after Medicare premiums are deducted? That could make a difference for qualification.
0 coins
Jason Brewer
This entire thread has been so educational - thank you all for sharing your experiences with family maximum situations! As someone who's been working in disability advocacy for several years, I wanted to add a few additional resources that might help families dealing with these complex benefit calculations. First, many people don't know that you can request a "Manual Computation" from SSA if you believe there's been an error in how your family maximum was calculated. This is different from a standard appeal and specifically asks them to manually review the mathematical calculations rather than just the eligibility determinations. Second, for families with disabled adult children, it's worth connecting with your state's Developmental Disabilities Services agency. While they can't change your Social Security benefits, they often have information about other support programs, respite care services, or vocational programs that can help offset some of the financial burden of care costs. Finally, I'd recommend documenting everything - not just your calls with SSA, but also your family's care expenses. If you ever need to apply for other assistance programs or tax benefits, having detailed records of your actual costs versus your reduced Social Security income can be crucial for demonstrating financial need. The system definitely isn't designed with families in mind, but understanding all these interconnected programs and resources can help maximize the support available to you.
0 coins
Dmitry Sokolov
•Thank you for this incredibly helpful information! As someone new to navigating this system, I had no idea about the Manual Computation option. That could be really valuable if we suspect there might be calculation errors. Your point about documenting care expenses is spot on - I've been keeping receipts but not in any organized way. Having a systematic record could definitely help if we need to apply for other programs down the road. The suggestion about connecting with Developmental Disabilities Services is great too. We've been so focused on the Social Security side of things that we haven't really explored what other state resources might be available. Even if they can't change our SS benefits, additional support services could make a real difference in managing our son's care needs. Do you know if the Manual Computation request needs to be submitted within a certain timeframe after benefits start, or can it be requested at any time if you suspect calculation errors?
0 coins
Mei-Ling Chen
•You can request a Manual Computation at any time - there's no specific deadline like there is with formal appeals. However, it's generally better to request it sooner rather than later, especially if you suspect ongoing calculation errors that are affecting your monthly benefits. When you request it, be specific about what you think might be wrong. For example, if you believe they're using the wrong PIA amount, or if you think they miscalculated how your husband's reduced benefit counts against the family maximum, mention that specifically. The more detailed you can be about your concerns, the more thorough their review will be. One other tip - if you do request a Manual Computation and they find an error that results in higher benefits, they can provide retroactive payments back to when the error began. So even if some time has passed, it's still worth pursuing if you have legitimate concerns about the calculations. Also, don't be discouraged if the first person you speak with isn't familiar with Manual Computation requests - it's not something they handle every day. You might need to ask to speak with a supervisor or technical expert who deals with complex benefit calculations.
0 coins
Caesar Grant
I'm dealing with a very similar situation and wanted to thank everyone for sharing their experiences - this thread has been incredibly valuable! My husband is 63 and we're trying to decide whether he should file for early retirement benefits or wait, given that we have a disabled adult daughter who would qualify for DAC benefits. Reading through all these responses, it's clear that the timing of the primary worker's filing has a huge impact on total family benefits due to the family maximum rules. The fact that the reduced early retirement benefit counts against the maximum (leaving less for auxiliary beneficiaries) is something I never would have understood without this discussion. @Eleanor Foster - I'm curious about one thing from your experience: when you spoke with SSA and got that breakdown showing the 175% family maximum, did they provide that information in writing, or was it just verbal? I'm wondering if I should specifically request written documentation of these calculations before my husband files, so we have a clear understanding of what to expect. Also, has anyone here found that different SSA field offices provide more helpful explanations than others? I'm wondering if it's worth visiting multiple offices or if the quality of information is generally consistent across locations. This whole situation really highlights how important it is to understand these complex interactions before making irreversible filing decisions!
0 coins
Dmitry Popov
•Great question about getting the information in writing! I actually did request written documentation after my phone conversation, and they were able to mail me a detailed benefit computation statement that shows exactly how the family maximum was calculated and applied to our specific situation. It took about 2 weeks to receive it, but having those actual numbers on paper has been really helpful for our financial planning. Regarding different field offices - I've only dealt with one office in person, but from what others have shared here and my own phone experiences, there definitely seems to be variation in how knowledgeable different representatives are about complex family maximum scenarios. Some seem to understand these situations well, while others just give generic responses. If you have multiple offices within reasonable distance, it might be worth calling a few to see which one seems most familiar with DAC and family maximum issues before scheduling an in-person appointment. One thing I'd strongly recommend is creating a list of specific questions before you visit, including asking for that written computation breakdown upfront. Having everything documented before your husband files will help you make a truly informed decision about timing. The irreversible nature of these filing decisions really can't be overstated!
0 coins
Lucas Kowalski
I'm a newcomer to this community but unfortunately not new to dealing with Social Security's complex benefit calculations. Reading through everyone's experiences here has been both enlightening and frustrating - it's clear that so many families are blindsided by how the Family Maximum Benefit rules actually work in practice. What strikes me most is how the system seems designed to be opaque rather than transparent. The fact that multiple SSA representatives give different explanations for the same situation suggests either inadequate training or intentionally confusing policies. Either way, it places an unfair burden on families who are already dealing with significant care responsibilities. I wanted to add one resource that hasn't been mentioned yet: the National Organization of Social Security Claimants' Representatives (NOSSCR) maintains a directory of attorneys who specialize in Social Security issues. While most people think of SS attorneys only for disability denials, some also provide consultations for complex benefit calculations like family maximum situations. Given that these filing decisions are irreversible and can cost families thousands of dollars over time, a one-time consultation fee might be worth it for the peace of mind and accurate calculations. Thank you all for sharing your experiences so openly - it's helping families like mine make more informed decisions about our own timing strategies.
0 coins
Aisha Khan
•Thank you for mentioning NOSSCR - that's a resource I hadn't heard of before! You're absolutely right that the system seems intentionally opaque. I've been wondering if there's a strategic reason why SSA representatives seem to give such inconsistent information about family maximum calculations. Your point about considering a consultation with a Social Security attorney is really valuable. I've been hesitant about the cost, but when you put it in perspective of potentially losing thousands over years due to poor timing decisions, it makes a lot of sense. Do you know if these attorneys typically charge flat fees for consultations, or is it more of an hourly rate situation? I'm also curious - have you found that having professional representation changes how SSA staff interact with you? I've heard some people say that having an attorney involved gets you taken more seriously, but I'm not sure if that applies to benefit calculations or just disability appeals. This whole thread has really opened my eyes to how much advance planning and professional guidance might be necessary for what I naively thought would be straightforward benefit applications. The complexity is overwhelming!
0 coins