< Back to Social Security Administration

Sophia Clark

Is 67 too old for Social Security FRA? Burned out after 45 years working with no PTO

I seriously wonder if anyone else feels like the Full Retirement Age of 67 is completely unreasonable? I just hit 65 last month and I'm absolutely EXHAUSTED. Been in construction since I was 19, so that's over 45 years of physical labor with the last decade really taking a toll on my back and knees. I get zero paid time off as an independent contractor. At least I'm down to 3 days on-site and can handle paperwork from home the other days, but man, the thought of grinding through 2 more years just to avoid that early retirement penalty feels impossible some mornings. Checked my SS statement online and if I retire now I'd only get about $2,450/month versus $3,050 if I somehow make it to 67. Doesn't help that I took almost 3 years off back in the 90s when my mom got sick and I had to care for her. Those "zero earning years" are really hurting my benefit calculation. My wife's monthly benefit will be nearly $3,800 at her FRA since she worked for the state with steady income the whole time. Makes me question why I'm killing myself for these extra two years. Anyone else facing this decision? Is holding out for FRA really worth it?

I completely understand where you're coming from. Construction work is HARD on the body! I was in a similar situation last year - turned 65 and was just DONE physically. I ended up retiring at 65 and taking the reduced benefit. Here's what helped me decide: I calculated the breakeven point. If you take $2,450 now vs waiting for $3,050, it would take about 12 years of receiving the higher amount to make up for the 2 years of payments you missed. So if you don't think you'll live past 79, taking it early actually makes financial sense. Also, have you looked into spousal benefits? Since your wife has a higher benefit, you might be eligible for up to 50% of her FRA amount if that's more than your own benefit. Worth checking into!

0 coins

Sophia Clark

•

Thanks for breaking down the math like that. I hadn't thought about the breakeven point. My dad and his brothers all died before 75, so genetically speaking, waiting till 67 might not be the best bet. I'll definitely look into the spousal benefit option - though I think my own benefit is still higher than 50% of hers. Really appreciate the insight!

0 coins

Madison Allen

•

Take it NOW!!! I waited till 66 and regret EVERY MINUTE. That's a year of freedom I'll never get back. Life's too short and the government keeps pushing the age back. When Social Security started the average lifespan was barely over 65 anyway. Now they expect us to work until we drop dead. With your wife's higher benefit you guys will be fine. Enjoy your life!!!

0 coins

Joshua Wood

•

This isn't completely accurate. The original Social Security retirement age was 65 when it started in 1935, and the average life expectancy then was around 61, but that figure was heavily skewed by high infant mortality. For people who reached adulthood, many lived well into their 70s. The FRA increase to 67 was actually planned back in 1983 reforms.

0 coins

Justin Evans

•

Have you considered partial retirement? You could reduce your hours even further, maybe just 1-2 days a week, and file for Social Security now. Since you're already at FRA for spousal benefits (which is still 66 for your birth year), you could potentially file for spousal benefits only now (restricted application) and let your own benefit continue to grow until 67 if you were born before January 2, 1954. That way you get some income now while still maximizing your own benefit later.

0 coins

Sophia Clark

•

I appreciate the suggestion, but I'm not sure how partial retirement would work in my situation. Most jobs in my field are all-or-nothing contracts. And I was born in 1960, so I think the restricted application option isn't available to me anymore? The Social Security rules are so confusing sometimes.

0 coins

Emily Parker

•

I feel your pain! I had to stop working at 63 (I'm 64 now) because my body just couldn't take it anymore after 40+ years as a nurse. My benefit is about $600 less than what I'd get at my FRA of 66 and 8 months. What I did was take a part-time job that's much less physically demanding - 15 hours a week at a local library. It's below the earnings limit ($22,320 in 2025 if you're under FRA) so it doesn't affect my SS benefits, and it helps supplement my income without killing me physically. Could you maybe find something similar that uses your knowledge but isn't so hard on your body?

0 coins

Sophia Clark

•

That's actually not a bad idea. I do have a lot of knowledge about building codes and permits that might be valuable in a consulting role. Something to think about for sure. How are you finding the adjustment to working part-time after so many years of full-time work?

0 coins

Emily Parker

•

It's been wonderful honestly! I have enough structure to my week that I don't feel aimless, but enough free time to actually enjoy life. The earnings limit isn't as restrictive as people think - even if you earn over the limit, they only withhold $1 in benefits for every $2 you earn above the limit. And once you hit FRA, there's no limit at all.

0 coins

Ezra Collins

•

I tried calling the SSA to discuss these exact same options last month and spent THREE DAYS trying to get through. Kept getting disconnected or told the wait time was over 2 hours. Finally used a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that got me connected to a real person at SSA in under 20 minutes. They have a video showing how it works at https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU The agent I spoke with actually ran different scenarios for me - retirement now, retirement at 66, spousal benefits, etc. Super helpful once I actually got someone on the phone! They explained that with my specific earnings history, waiting until 66 (my FRA) would increase my monthly check by $410, which adds up over time.

0 coins

Sophia Clark

•

Thanks for the tip! I've been putting off calling because everyone says it's impossible to get through. I'll check out that service. Did the agent give you different calculations in writing or just over the phone?

0 coins

Ezra Collins

•

They gave me the information over the phone, but then I asked them to mail me the different benefit estimates in writing. Got the letter about a week later. It was really helpful to see the numbers for different retirement ages side by side.

0 coins

Consider this: you've already mentioned that physically you're struggling. Construction is brutal on the body. I've worked with many clients in similar situations, and here's what I typically suggest: 1. Get an exact calculation of your combined household income with different scenarios (you retire now + wife's benefit when she claims) 2. Look at your expenses - do you have mortgage/debt that needs to be paid before retiring? 3. Health insurance costs until Medicare kicks in (though at 65 you should already have Medicare) 4. Tax implications of different claiming strategies Many people fixate on maximizing their SS benefit, but if continuing to work is damaging your health or significantly reducing your quality of life, the extra amount may not be worth it. Remember, your benefit gets COLA adjustments regardless of when you claim.

0 coins

Sophia Clark

•

These are really good points. We've paid off our mortgage, and I'm on Medicare already. My wife plans to work until her FRA in 2 years. I think we could make it work financially if I retired now, but I've always been the 'responsible one' who worried about the future. Hard to break that mindset.

0 coins

That's common! Many of my clients who've worked hard their entire lives struggle with the psychological shift to retirement. But remember - taking care of your health IS being responsible. You've earned your retirement, and with your mortgage paid off and Medicare coverage, you're in a better position than many. The fact that your wife will continue working for 2 more years provides an additional safety net during your transition.

0 coins

Joshua Wood

•

i retired at 62 and never looked back! monthly check is smaller sure but i got 5 extra yrs of freedom and my health improved a ton once i stopped the physical work. no amount of money can buy those years back. you only live once man

0 coins

Justin Evans

•

While this works for some people, it's important to recognize that claiming at 62 results in a permanent reduction of 30% from your full retirement age benefit. That reduction lasts for your entire lifetime. For someone with longevity in their family, this could mean significantly less income over a 20-30 year retirement period. It's a highly personal decision based on health, finances, and expected longevity.

0 coins

Madison Allen

•

My neighbor was in construction too, waited til 67 to retire and had a heart attack 3 months later!!! Spent his last year in and out of hospitals. What good did those extra dollars do him? NONE. The system is rigged to make us work ourselves to death.

0 coins

I'm very sorry about your neighbor. While anecdotes like this are powerful, it's important to balance them with comprehensive planning. Each person's health situation, financial needs, and family longevity is different. That said, quality of life considerations should absolutely factor into retirement timing decisions. A balanced approach considers both financial security and well-being.

0 coins

One thing no one's mentioned yet - have you considered the impact on your spouse if something happened to you? If you claim early and pass away before her, her survivor benefit would be based on your reduced amount (though there are some special rules that might apply). If you think she might rely on your benefit as a survivor someday, waiting for a higher amount might be worth considering. On the other hand, if she'll always use her own higher benefit amount, then this is less of a concern. Just something else to factor into your decision.

0 coins

Sophia Clark

•

That's a really important point I hadn't thought about. Given the health issues in my family history, the survivor benefit could matter. Though as you said, her own benefit is substantially higher than mine would be even at FRA, so she'd probably continue on her own benefit if I passed first. But definitely something to consider in the overall picture.

0 coins

Social Security Administration AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today