Can I contribute to 401k to stay under SS earnings limit while collecting survivor benefits?
I'll be turning 62 next April and trying to figure out my best strategy with Social Security. I lost my wife to cancer in 2023 after 29 years together. She was always the primary earner (made about 2.5x what I did) since I scaled back my career when our daughter was young. I'm thinking about taking my own reduced retirement benefit at 62 while continuing to work part-time at my current job. My question is about the earnings test - can I contribute heavily to my 401k (planning to put in about 30% of my salary) to keep my income under the 2025 earnings limit? Then my plan would be to switch to my survivor benefits at my full retirement age of 67. Would this approach work or am I missing something about how SS counts income for the earnings test? My HR department wasn't sure about this when I asked them.
16 comments
Zoe Papadakis
Unfortunately, 401k contributions don't reduce your countable income for Social Security earnings test purposes. SSA looks at your gross wages before any deductions (including retirement contributions) when applying the annual earnings limit. For 2025, that limit for someone under FRA is projected to be around $22,750 (they adjust it yearly). Anything you earn above that will cause SSA to withhold $1 in benefits for every $2 you exceed the limit. Your overall strategy of taking your own benefit at 62 and then switching to survivor benefits at FRA is generally sound, especially since your wife was a higher earner. But the 401k contributions won't help you stay under the earnings limit.
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
•Oh no, that changes everything in my calculations. I was counting on those 401k contributions helping me stay under the limit. If they're using my gross wages, I'd be well over the limit even working part-time. Do you know if I can still make those 401k contributions even while collecting Social Security? Or should I just wait until FRA to claim anything?
0 coins
Jamal Carter
I'm in almost the EXACT same boat as you!! My husband passed in 2021 and I'm trying to figure out the whole SS mess. The Social Security office is IMPOSSIBLE to reach by phone - I've tried calling TWENTY times and either get disconnected or told the wait is over 2 hours!!! So frustrating!!! From what I was told by my financial advisor, they look at your earnings BEFORE any deductions for the earnings test. So your 401k contributions won't help keep you under the limit. It's so UNFAIR how they handle this stuff!!
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
•I had the same issue trying to reach SSA! Wasted hours upon hours. Finally used a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that got me connected to a real person at Social Security within 20 minutes. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU - saved me so much frustration! I needed to get my survivor benefit questions answered before making decisions.
0 coins
Mei Liu
I work with retirees on their Social Security planning, and I can clarify a few things here: 1. For the earnings test, SSA counts your gross wages or net self-employment income BEFORE any deductions like 401k contributions, taxes, etc. 2. Your strategy of taking your own benefit at 62 and switching to survivor benefits at FRA (67) can be smart in many cases, but only if your earnings won't cause most of your benefits to be withheld. 3. You should absolutely continue making 401k contributions regardless of Social Security - they're completely separate issues. 4. Consider that survivor benefits are reduced if taken before your FRA, but NOT reduced if taken at or after FRA. Meanwhile, your own retirement benefit is permanently reduced by about 30% if taken at 62. Have you calculated whether your survivor benefit at FRA would be significantly higher than your own retirement benefit at 62? That's the key calculation here.
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
•Thank you for the detailed explanation. Yes, I've looked at my statement online and my estimated retirement benefit at 62 would be about $1,640, while the survivor benefit at my FRA would be around $2,850. That's why I was thinking of the strategy to take mine early then switch. But if I can't control the earnings test with 401k contributions, I'm wondering if I should just wait on everything until I fully retire or reach FRA.
0 coins
Liam O'Sullivan
my husband died last year and i went thru all this. SS is SO CONFUSING! i just wanted to say that you should really try to talk to someone at SS directly because the rules are complicated and everyone's situation is different. I thought I understood everything from reading online but when I finally got through to them they told me something completely different about my options than what I thought
0 coins
Amara Chukwu
•This is such a great point! Social Security rules are incredibly complex, especially when it comes to survivor benefits combined with your own retirement. I've seen many people make costly mistakes by relying solely on general information. Each case really is unique. One thing worth mentioning: if you're still working, remember that while 401k contributions don't reduce your countable income for the earnings test, they DO reduce your taxable income for determining whether your Social Security benefits are subject to income tax. So there's still a tax advantage there, just not for the earnings limit purpose.
0 coins
Giovanni Conti
I think you need to run actual numbers. If your part-time job pays $35k, and the earnings limit is $22k (approx), you'd lose $6,500 in benefits ($1 for every $2 over). But if your benefit is $1,600/month, that's $19,200 annually, so you'd still come out ahead by about $12,700 even with the reduction. Plus you'd get 5 years of some benefits vs nothing. Everyone's quick to say "wait till FRA" but sometimes claiming early even with penalties makes financial sense depending on your specific numbers.
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
•That's a really interesting perspective - I hadn't thought about it that way. Even with the partial reduction due to the earnings test, I might still come out ahead financially in the short term. I need to sit down and calculate exactly how much I'd receive after penalties versus waiting. Thank you!
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
i got confused so I looked this up - if u start your own benefits at 62 and then switch to survivors later, your survivors benefit WONT be reduced. BUT if u take survivors benfits early and switch to your own later, your own benefit IS reduced. Social security is so complicated!!
0 coins
Zoe Papadakis
•That's correct. Survivor benefits reach their maximum at your FRA - they don't increase after that point (unlike retirement benefits which increase until age 70). That's why taking your own reduced benefit first, then switching to unreduced survivor benefits at FRA can be a good strategy for many widow(er)s. And for the original poster: one clarification - while 401k contributions won't help with the earnings test, if you have a job with variable hours or seasonal work, you could potentially manage your work schedule to stay under the earnings limit in certain years when you want to receive full benefits.
0 coins
Jamal Carter
Are you SURE you want to keep working? When my husband died I thought I needed to keep working but then realized life is SHORT. I ended up cutting back to minimal part-time (staying under the earnings limit) and it's been the best decision. Just something to consider - sometimes the financial "perfect" answer isn't the best life answer. Maybe take your benefit, work just enough to stay under the limit, and actually ENJOY these years! Just my two cents as someone who's been there.
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
•You raise a really good point that I've been thinking about a lot lately. After losing my wife, my priorities have definitely shifted. Maybe I don't need to maximize every dollar and should focus more on quality of life. Working just enough to stay under the limit might be the sweet spot - still keeping active and contributing to my 401k, but having more time to actually enjoy life. Thank you for sharing your perspective.
0 coins
Mei Liu
Since you mentioned health insurance: be aware that if you take Social Security at 62, you still won't be eligible for Medicare until 65. Make sure you factor your health insurance costs into your calculations for those 3 years if you're planning to reduce your work hours. Many people forget this important detail when planning early retirement with Social Security.
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
•That's a crucial point I'd overlooked. My employer health insurance is quite good, but if I reduce my hours too much, I might lose eligibility. I'll have to check with HR about what the minimum hours would be to maintain coverage. The cost of private health insurance for 3 years until Medicare eligibility could definitely change my calculations.
0 coins