Social Security Administration
CommunityGovernment Services


Ask the community...
I'm in a really frustrating situation with my SSI benefits right now. I discovered I had an overpayment and did the right thing by reporting it to SSA about 2 weeks ago. Instead of working with me, they immediately put my account on hold and told me I won't receive ANY payments until the entire overpayment (about $4,270) is paid back! I can barely survive without my monthly SSI, so I requested the standard 10% monthly payback option that I know they're supposed to offer. Here's where it gets ridiculous - the rep told me that since my account is already on hold and I'm not currently receiving payments, I CAN'T request a reduced payment plan! How does that make any sense??? It feels like I'm trapped in some kind of bureaucratic nightmare. I tried explaining that I NEED my benefits to live, and I'm willing to have them take 10% each month, but they just kept repeating the same thing. Has anyone dealt with this weird catch-22 situation before? What am I supposed to do if I can't get benefits until I pay back money I don't have, but can't set up a payment plan because my benefits are frozen?
I'm at my wits end with SSA regarding my son's SSI benefits. Since October, I've been reporting that he's paying his fair share of housing/utilities (about $475 monthly) instead of receiving 'in-kind support'. I've faxed documentation THREE times with receipts and proof of payment. His SSI payment should have increased once this change was processed, but it hasn't budged. Meanwhile, he works part-time (12 hrs weekly) at a grocery store. I've reported his wages faithfully every month since September - faxed paystubs, called SSA directly, even provided his employer's EIN so we could report electronically. I've documented EVERYTHING. I've tried reporting through the app and online, but it keeps saying "no record of working" even though I've reported his job multiple times. In December, I physically went to the SSA office, waited 3+ hours, and they acknowledged they had all my faxes and would fix everything. They essentially said "oops, our bad." Fast forward to today - I received a letter demanding BACK PAY for his October-December wages, but STILL nothing acknowledging he's paying fair share for housing! If they'd processed the fair share housing arrangement correctly, his SSI would have increased BEFORE the wage deductions, and we likely wouldn't owe anything. I can't get through on phones (2+ hour waits before disconnecting), local office no longer accepts walk-ins, and appointment wait times are ridiculous. How do I fix this mess when I can't even reach a human being? Has anyone successfully resolved this kind of SSI reporting nightmare?
Just a warning - even when you get this fixed, be prepared for a mess. When they finally fixed my brother's case, they issued back payments for the months they had incorrectly reduced his benefits, but then sent ANOTHER letter a month later claiming those back payments were issued in error!!! It took another 3 months to sort that out. Save EVERY letter they send you.
I'm dealing with a similar situation with my disabled nephew's SSI. The coordination between wage reporting and living arrangement changes is absolutely terrible at SSA. Here's what finally worked for us: 1. File Form SSA-561 (Request for Reconsideration) immediately - this stops collection while they review 2. Submit everything via certified mail with return receipt - faxes get lost constantly 3. In your reconsideration letter, explicitly state that the fair share arrangement should have been processed BEFORE applying wage deductions 4. Request a "chronological review" of all your submissions since October The key phrase to use is "failure to process living arrangement change resulted in incorrect overpayment calculation." Make them prove they processed your fair share documentation correctly before demanding repayment. Also, if you have any family members who are veterans, try contacting the VA - they sometimes have backdoor contacts at SSA that can expedite complex cases like this. It's worth a shot when you're dealing with this level of bureaucratic nightmare. Document everything and don't give up. The system is broken but your case is definitely fixable with persistence.
I just got laid off last week at age 64 (and a half) and trying to figure out the best timing between unemployment benefits and Social Security. My state allows collecting both, but I'm confused about WHEN to apply for each.Unemployment benefits start March 15th for me, but they're pathetically low ($375/week max) and only last 26 weeks. I was thinking about filing for SS with an April 1st start date.My questions:1) Should I wait until my unemployment is approved FIRST before applying for SS?2) Will starting SS now permanently reduce my benefit compared to waiting until FRA?3) If I DO find a good job in the next few months, I know I can withdraw my SS application within 12 months if I repay everything - but is this process complicated?My situation: I'm the lower earner (my husband is 62, still working full-time). He'll eventually get 3 different pensions plus his own SS when he retires in a few years. I'm not feeling super optimistic about finding another job at my age, which is why I'm considering SS now rather than waiting until 66+.Any advice on the timing between unemployment and SS would be so helpful!
Since it hasn't been mentioned yet - make sure you understand that Social Security benefits might be partially taxable depending on your combined income. If your provisional income (adjusted gross income + nontaxable interest + 1/2 of Social Security benefits) exceeds certain thresholds, up to 85% of your benefits could be subject to federal income tax.With your unemployment benefits, any part-time work, and your husband's income, you might hit these thresholds, so it's worth factoring that into your calculations.
Just want to add a perspective as someone who's been through this recently - I filed for SS at 64 after being laid off, similar to your situation. The key thing that helped me was creating a simple spreadsheet comparing my monthly cash flow under different scenarios (unemployment only vs unemployment + reduced SS vs waiting for FRA). Given that your husband is still working and has multiple pensions coming, you have more flexibility than someone who's completely on their own. The 12% reduction sounds scary, but if you need the income now and your husband will likely have good benefits later, it might be worth the peace of mind. Plus, unemployment benefits are temporary - only 26 weeks in most states. One thing I wish I'd known: even though you can withdraw your SS application within 12 months, it's not as simple as just changing your mind. You have to repay EVERYTHING including any Medicare premiums that were deducted, and the paperwork takes time. So really think through your decision before filing. Good luck with whatever you decide! Being laid off at our age is stressful enough without having to navigate all these government systems.
I've been holding off on claiming my Social Security until I hit 70 in about 3 months to maximize my benefit amount. My wife is currently 68 and hasn't filed for any benefits yet. Our plan was for her to claim a spousal benefit based on my record once I start collecting at 70. Here's where I'm confused - when my wife turns 70 next year, can she switch from the spousal benefit to her own retirement benefit if her benefit would be higher than the spousal amount (which is 50% of mine)? Or once she claims the spousal benefit, is she permanently stuck with that amount even if her own benefit would eventually be higher? I want to make sure we're maximizing our total household SS income and not making a mistake that could cost us thousands over the long run. Any insights from folks who've navigated this situation would be greatly appreciated!
Just to add some specific numbers that might help you visualize this situation: Let's say your Primary Insurance Amount (PIA) - the amount you'd get at your Full Retirement Age - is $3,000. At age 70, with delayed retirement credits, you'd receive approximately $3,720. If your wife's PIA is $2,400, at age 68 she would receive about $2,688 on her own record. The spousal benefit would be 50% of your PIA, so $1,500. In this scenario, when your wife files at age 68, she would automatically receive her own benefit of $2,688 since it's higher than the spousal benefit of $1,500. If she waited until 70, her own benefit would grow to about $2,976. Everyone's numbers are different, but this illustrates why many couples with similar earnings histories often find that spousal benefits aren't relevant - both spouses' own benefits are higher.
This numerical example is extremely helpful! Our numbers are somewhat similar to your example, with my benefit being higher but my wife also having a substantial benefit on her own record. Based on all the advice here, it sounds like we should calculate both scenarios: 1. Wife claims at 68 (getting her own benefit if it's higher than spousal) 2. Wife waits until 70 for maximum benefit Then we can see which option maximizes our lifetime benefits. Thanks everyone for all the helpful information!
One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is the impact of Medicare premiums on your decision. If your wife has higher income from waiting until 70, she might face higher Medicare Part B and Part D premiums due to IRMAA (Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount) thresholds. Also, don't forget about the "earnings test" if either of you plan to work at all before Full Retirement Age. Since your wife is already 68, this probably doesn't apply, but it's worth checking if she has any earned income. You might want to use the SSA's online calculators or consider getting a personalized benefit statement to run the exact numbers for your situation. Every couple's circumstances are unique, and small differences in birth dates, earnings history, and life expectancy can significantly impact the optimal claiming strategy.
I'm turning 67 next month and lost my spouse in 2008. I've been receiving a state teacher's pension ($3,250/month) and didn't apply for survivor benefits at 60 because the GPO calculation showed I'd get exactly $0 after the reduction. With this new GPO/WEP repeal miracle finally happening, I called SSA on December 23rd to schedule an appointment about survivor benefits, but my phone appointment isn't until February 14th! The question keeping me up at night: since I called BEFORE the repeal took effect in January 2025, is there any chance I could get retroactive benefits for January and February? Or does the actual application date in February mean I lose those two months? My neighbor said I should be entitled to payments from the date I called, but that sounds too good to be true. Anyone know how SSA handles this timing issue with the new repeal?
my aunt got widow benefits and she said they backpay from when u first become eligible not from when u apply so you should get money back to when u turned 60 maybe?
That's incorrect in this specific situation. While survivor benefits can indeed be paid retroactively (up to 6 months), the OP wasn't eligible for benefits before January 2025 because the GPO would have reduced her benefit to $0. She only becomes eligible starting January 2025 when the GPO repeal takes effect, so there's no possibility of getting benefits back to age 60.
I'm in a very similar situation - also a retired teacher with a pension, and I lost my husband in 2010. I've been following this GPO/WEP repeal closely because like you, I was told years ago that I'd get $0 in survivor benefits. Reading through all these responses, especially from Jamal who says he's with SSA, gives me hope that those of us who called before the effective date will be protected. I'm planning to call SSA next week to start my application process. Thank you for posting this - it's so helpful to see others going through the same thing. Please update us after your February appointment to let us know how it goes!
Mateo Sanchez
did u try calling ur congressperson? my aunt had a problem with SS and she called her congressmans office and they fixed it in like 2 days
0 coins
Carmen Vega
This is actually great advice that many people overlook. Congressional inquiries on behalf of constituents often get fast-tracked at SSA. The constituent services staff at your representative's office deal with these issues regularly and know exactly who to contact.
0 coins
CosmicCommander
I'm really sorry you're going through this - it's such a stressful situation to be in. Based on what others have shared here, it sounds like you have several good options to pursue simultaneously: 1. File the formal appeals (SSA-561 and SSA-632 forms) as soon as possible - these seem to be the most direct path to getting your benefits restored while you're dealing with the overpayment issue. 2. Try that Claimyr service that Ethan mentioned to actually get through to a Claims Specialist who has the authority to adjust your withholding rate. The regular phone reps clearly don't have the same level of knowledge about these policies. 3. Request the detailed breakdown of how they calculated your overpayment amount - if there are any errors, that could significantly reduce what you owe. 4. Consider reaching out to your congressional representative's office for help - it's free and they have direct contacts at SSA who can often resolve these issues quickly. The key thing seems to be that you absolutely DO have the right to a reduced payment plan, but you need to get to the right person who knows the proper procedures. Don't let them tell you otherwise - the policy is clearly written that you can request reduced withholding for financial hardship. Stay strong and keep advocating for yourself. This sounds like a bureaucratic mistake that can be fixed once you get to someone who knows what they're doing.
0 coins