

Ask the community...
WAIT! Everyone here is giving advice without asking a critical question: is your husband still working? If so, how much does he earn? Because if he claims before his FRA and earns above the earnings limit (about $21,240 for 2025), both HIS benefits AND any benefits paid on his record (including your spousal benefits) would be reduced by $1 for every $2 earned above that limit. This earnings test could significantly impact what you'd actually receive!
Yes, he's still working full-time and makes about $78,000 per year. But he's planning to work until his FRA (67) and then claim. Would the earnings test affect me if I claim spousal benefits at 62 while he's still working but hasn't filed yet?
The earnings test would only apply if your husband claims benefits before his FRA while still working. Since he plans to wait until his FRA to claim, the earnings test won't affect his benefits or any benefits paid on his record (including your spousal benefits). You can claim your spousal benefits at 62 (with the permanent reduction) while he continues working, and his earnings won't impact your benefit amount. The earnings test would only apply to you if YOU were working while collecting benefits early.
Hi Ana! I see you've gotten some great detailed advice here. Just wanted to add one more consideration that might help with your decision: have you thought about potentially going back to work part-time for a few years to build up some of your own work credits? Even earning just $7,180 per year (the 2025 amount for one work credit) for 4-5 years could help boost your own benefit calculation and give you more flexibility. Sometimes people find that even a small part-time job can significantly improve their Social Security picture, especially if those earnings replace some of those zero-earning years in your calculation. Plus, if you're healthy and able to work, the extra income could help you delay claiming until your FRA for that full 50% spousal benefit. Just another option to consider alongside all the excellent advice you've already received!
They are separate benefits, but the SSA systems treat them as choices within your overall record. When you apply for survivor benefits, clearly state that you want to KEEP your retirement benefits suspended. Get the representative to note this in your file. Also request written confirmation of this instruction. Without being explicit about this, there is a risk they could restart your retirement benefits. Document everything - the name of the representative, date, and confirmation numbers for all communications.
I'm so sorry for your loss, Lauren. You're dealing with a lot right now, and I want to add one important point that might help with your immediate financial concerns. Since you mentioned you're worried about managing financially during the survivor benefit application process - you may be eligible for a one-time lump sum death payment of $255 if you were living with your husband at the time of his death. This is separate from ongoing survivor benefits and can be processed much faster. You'll need to apply within 2 years of his death. It's not a huge amount, but every little bit helps when you're facing an overpayment situation. Also, regarding that overpayment - definitely explore the hardship waiver option given your changed circumstances. The loss of your husband's income combined with the suspended benefits could qualify you for relief. Document your current financial hardship thoroughly when you submit the waiver request.
Thank you for mentioning the $255 death payment - I had no idea that existed! Every bit does help right now. I'll make sure to apply for that when I go in for the survivor benefits. The hardship waiver is something I definitely need to explore too. Between losing his income and having my benefits suspended, we've gone from a tight but manageable budget to barely scraping by. I've been so focused on the big picture of which benefits to choose that I missed these immediate options. Really appreciate you pointing these out!
I went thru the same thing!! When my SSDI changed over i was SHOCKED it was the same amount, i always thought SSDI was more. My neighbor said her husband's check actually went DOWN but i think she's confused about something because everything i've read says the amount stays the same?? The whole system is so confusing lol.
Your neighbor might be confusing it with another situation. SSDI benefits convert to retirement benefits at exactly the same amount. The only way benefits would go down is if someone was receiving multiple benefits (like dependent benefits) and something changed with their eligibility. But the base benefit amount definitely stays the same through the conversion.
I'm in a similar situation - my FRA is coming up in a few months and I've been wondering the same thing! From what I've learned reading through these comments, it sounds like the key factor is whether you would have had higher earning years during those 8 years you were on SSDI. Since Social Security uses your highest 35 years of indexed earnings, if you were in your peak earning phase when you became disabled, you probably would have seen some increase in your retirement benefit. But the disability freeze protected you from having zero-income years hurt your calculation, which is actually a good thing. One thing that might help is looking at your old tax returns from right before you went on disability - that could give you an idea of what your trajectory was earnings-wise. If your salary was trending upward, you might have missed out on some higher benefit calculations. But honestly, the peace of mind from having SSDI during those years when you needed it was probably worth more than any potential difference in monthly benefits.
That's a really good point about looking at old tax returns! I hadn't thought of that approach. You're absolutely right that the peace of mind was worth it - I definitely needed the SSDI when my disability started. I was actually doing pretty well career-wise before everything happened, so there's a good chance I would have seen some increase in benefits if I'd been able to keep working. But like you said, having that financial security during a really difficult time was invaluable. Thanks for the perspective!
One more important thing: WEP can't reduce your Social Security by more than half of your pension amount. So with your $3,100 pension, the maximum WEP reduction would be $1,550. Also, if you have 30+ years of substantial earnings under Social Security, WEP doesn't apply at all. With 12 years, you get a partial exemption. And regarding the timing question - yes, waiting until your Full Retirement Age would avoid the early claiming reduction, which makes a significant difference. At 62, you'd get only about 70% of your PIA (Primary Insurance Amount), and then WEP would reduce that further.
This is such a helpful thread! I'm in a similar situation as a retired teacher from Ohio and was completely unaware of WEP until I started researching my benefits. One thing I'd add is that you might want to double-check your earnings record on ssa.gov to make sure all your Social Security-covered work years are properly recorded. I found two years missing from mine and had to submit W-2s to get them added, which improved my substantial earnings count for the WEP calculation. Also, Harper, since you mentioned having 12 years of substantial earnings, you might qualify for the WEP guarantee provision that limits how much they can reduce your benefit. Definitely worth getting the exact calculation from SSA!
That's really great advice about checking the earnings record! I just created my ssa.gov account and you're absolutely right - I'm missing one year from when I worked retail before teaching. Do you remember how long it took SSA to process the W-2s you submitted? I want to make sure my record is complete before I apply for benefits. Also wondering if those missing earnings years could potentially bump me up to having enough substantial earnings to reduce the WEP impact even more.
Mohammad Khaled
I just wanted to thank everyone for this incredibly detailed and helpful discussion! As someone who's been struggling to understand how the FAIR Act affects my situation as a FERS postal employee with 13 years service, this thread has been more informative than anything I've found on official government websites. The step-by-step guidance about requesting Form SSA-7050 first, then checking the online Social Security account, and finally calling SSA with all documentation ready seems like the perfect roadmap. It's also reassuring to learn that FERS employees like myself who paid into both systems during our postal careers are generally in a better position than CSRS employees. I'm especially grateful for the clarification about the 30-year substantial earnings threshold for WEP exemption. With my 13 USPS years plus 22 other years of SS-covered work, it sounds like I should be well above that threshold, assuming most years meet the substantial earnings amount for their respective years. I'll definitely follow the advice shared here and start with getting my complete earnings record before contacting SSA. It's encouraging to hear from people who have successfully navigated this process recently. This community is amazing - thank you all for sharing your knowledge and experiences!
0 coins
Lucas Bey
•I completely agree - this thread has been incredibly valuable! As someone new to understanding these benefits, I've learned so much from everyone's shared experiences. The clear action plan that's emerged (Form SSA-7050 → online account check → SSA call with documentation) makes what seemed like an overwhelming process much more manageable. It's also really helpful to understand that with 35 total years of SS coverage, you should be in excellent shape for WEP exemption. I'm bookmarking this discussion because the detailed explanations about FERS vs CSRS differences and the substantial earnings thresholds are so much clearer than anything I've found on government sites. Thank you for summarizing the key takeaways - it'll help other newcomers like me who might find this thread in the future!
0 coins
Maxwell St. Laurent
I'm a newer member here but wanted to share what I learned after going through a similar situation recently. As a FERS postal employee with 14 years of service plus other SS-covered work, I was initially confused about how the FAIR Act would affect me too. After following the excellent advice in this thread about getting Form SSA-7050 and speaking with SSA, I discovered that the key really is understanding whether your years meet the "substantial earnings" threshold. What surprised me was that some of my earlier working years from the 1990s and early 2000s actually did qualify as substantial earnings even though the dollar amounts seemed low - the thresholds were much lower back then. For someone with your work history (13 USPS + 22 other SS years), you're very likely already exempt from WEP or will see significant relief under the FAIR Act. The fact that you paid into Social Security during your entire postal career as a FERS employee puts you in a much better position than CSRS employees. One tip: when you request Form SSA-7050, also ask for a "WEP calculation worksheet" if one applies to your situation. This shows exactly how your benefits are being calculated and whether WEP is actually affecting you. In some cases, people think they're subject to WEP when they're actually not. The implementation is definitely happening in phases, but don't let that discourage you from getting your paperwork in order now. Having accurate information will make your retirement planning much more reliable. Good luck!
0 coins