Using Section 179 deduction - what happens to the profit that taxes aren't due on?
Hey tax folks! I'm running a small landscaping business and just purchased a new commercial mower for $15,800. My accountant mentioned I could take a Section 179 deduction for the full amount this year instead of depreciating it over several years. I understand this will reduce my taxable income by $15,800, but I'm confused about what happens to that "profit" I'm not paying taxes on. Does it just disappear? Or is it still considered part of my business assets somewhere? If I sell the mower in a few years, will I have to pay taxes on the sale price since I've already deducted the full purchase amount? This is my first year with major equipment purchases, and I want to make sure I understand the tax implications before filing. Any help would be appreciated!
18 comments


Natasha Kuznetsova
The Section 179 deduction essentially allows you to accelerate depreciation by taking it all at once instead of spreading it over the useful life of the equipment. What happens is that you're reducing your taxable income now rather than a little each year. When you take the full Section 179 deduction, your "basis" in the equipment becomes zero. This doesn't mean the profit disappears - it means you've gotten the tax benefit upfront. If you later sell the mower, you'd have to report the sale price as income (technically "recapture") because your basis is zero. So if you sell it for $8,000 in three years, that entire $8,000 would be taxable income. This is different from regular depreciation where you might still have some remaining basis when you sell it. The Section 179 deduction is great for cash flow now, but remember you're essentially trading future tax deductions for immediate ones.
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
•So does that mean it's not always better to take Section 179? Like if I think I'll sell the equipment for a good price in just a couple years, maybe regular depreciation would be better?
0 coins
Natasha Kuznetsova
•That's a great question! It really depends on your specific situation. If you expect your tax rate to be higher now than in future years, taking the full deduction immediately usually makes sense. If you anticipate selling the equipment soon for a significant amount, regular depreciation might be more advantageous since you'd have a higher remaining basis, resulting in less taxable income upon sale. Many business owners also consider their cash flow needs - the immediate tax savings from Section 179 can be valuable for reinvesting in your business now, even if it means potentially higher taxes later.
0 coins
Javier Mendoza
After reading through this thread, I wanted to share my experience with Section 179 deductions. Last year I was in a similar situation with my home inspection business when I purchased a thermal imaging camera and some other equipment. I was confused about all the tax implications and wasn't sure if I was making the right choice. I found this service called taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) that helped me analyze the different depreciation scenarios. You can upload your business documents and it breaks down whether Section 179 or regular depreciation makes more sense based on your specific situation. It showed me the multi-year impact of each option which really clarified things. The tool also explained the "recapture" concept that happens if you sell equipment after taking Section 179, which was super helpful since I hadn't considered that aspect before.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
•How accurate is this tool? I've been burned by online tax calculators before that gave me bad advice. Does it actually understand all the nuances of Section 179 vs regular depreciation?
0 coins
Malik Davis
•This sounds interesting but I'm skeptical about giving my financial info to a random website. Is it secure? And does it actually provide advice specific to your business or just general guidelines anyone could Google?
0 coins
Javier Mendoza
•The calculations were spot-on when I compared them with what my accountant later confirmed. It handles all the phase-out thresholds and correctly calculated my specific recapture exposure based on estimated future selling prices I entered. Regarding security, they use bank-level encryption and don't store your raw documents after analysis. It gives specific recommendations based on your actual numbers - in my case, it showed that Section 179 made sense for my camera but not for my computer equipment because of the different expected useful lives and my specific tax bracket situation.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
Just wanted to update after trying taxr.ai that was mentioned earlier. I was hesitant but decided to give it a shot with my brewery equipment purchases. Honestly, it was eye-opening! The analysis showed me that taking Section 179 on my fermentation tanks would save me about $4,300 in taxes this year, but I'd be better off using regular depreciation for the delivery van based on my expected usage and trade-in timing. The visualization of tax savings over a 7-year period really helped me understand the long-term impact of these decisions. It also flagged that I was getting close to the Section 179 deduction limit with all my purchases combined this year (something I hadn't realized). Definitely saved me from making a costly mistake!
0 coins
Isabella Santos
For anyone dealing with questions about Section 179 or other tax issues, I highly recommend getting direct answers from the IRS. I know that sounds crazy given how impossible it is to reach them by phone, but I used https://claimyr.com and it was a game-changer. I had been trying for weeks to get clarification on how Section 179 would affect my business vehicle deduction. After calling the standard IRS number and waiting on hold for 2+ hours (twice!), I gave up and tried Claimyr. They got me connected to an IRS agent in under 20 minutes! You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent was able to answer my specific questions about recapture rules if I use my vehicle partially for personal use after taking the Section 179 deduction. Saved me from making a potentially expensive mistake on my taxes.
0 coins
Oliver Schulz
•Wait, how does this actually work? They somehow get you to the front of the IRS phone queue? That seems impossible given how backed up the IRS phone lines are.
0 coins
Ravi Gupta
•Yeah right, I've heard about these "skip the line" services before and they're usually scams. I find it hard to believe anyone can magically get through to the IRS faster than everyone else. What's the catch? They probably charge an arm and a leg.
0 coins
Isabella Santos
•It works because they use automation to continuously dial and navigate the IRS phone system until they get through, then they call you and connect you. It's not skipping the line exactly - they're just handling the hold time for you. There's no magic trick - they're basically waiting on hold so you don't have to. I was skeptical too, but I was desperate after multiple failed attempts. When they called me, I was connected directly to an IRS representative who answered all my questions about Section 179 recapture rules. Honestly, the time saved was worth it for me since I could keep working instead of being stuck with my phone on speaker for hours.
0 coins
Ravi Gupta
I need to eat my words about Claimyr. After my skeptical comment, I decided to try it because I was completely stuck trying to reach someone at the IRS about my Section 179 question (specifically about leased vs purchased equipment eligibility). It actually worked! I got a call back in about 25 minutes and was connected with an IRS agent who cleared up my confusion. Turns out I was misinterpreting the rules about leased equipment and Section 179, which could have caused major issues on my return. I'm genuinely surprised and had to come back to admit it actually delivered what it promised. Saved me hours of frustration and potentially an audit headache. Sometimes being proven wrong is a good thing!
0 coins
GalacticGuru
One thing nobody has mentioned is that Section 179 doesn't have to be all-or-nothing. You can choose to take just a portion as Section 179 and depreciate the rest normally. This has helped me with tax planning in my small fabrication shop. For example, last year I bought a CNC machine for $32,000 but only took $20,000 as Section 179 and am depreciating the remaining $12,000. This gave me immediate tax savings while still leaving some depreciation deductions for future years. Might be worth considering in your situation.
0 coins
Oliver Schulz
•That's actually really helpful - I had no idea you could split it up like that! How do you decide what portion to take as Section 179 vs regular depreciation? Is there a formula or rule of thumb?
0 coins
GalacticGuru
•I basically look at my projected income for the year and figure out how much deduction I need to keep myself in a favorable tax bracket. If taking the full Section 179 would push me too far down or waste the deduction, I'll split it up. For most small businesses, it makes sense to take enough Section 179 to get your income to a target level, then save the rest for future years when you might need the deductions more. Your accountant should be able to model this with your specific numbers. It gives you more flexibility than the all-or-nothing approach most people think is required.
0 coins
Freya Pedersen
Just a warning from someone who made this mistake - remember that Section 179 requires the equipment to be used more than 50% for business. I took Section 179 on a truck that later became more of a personal vehicle, and got hit with a nasty recapture tax bill. Make sure that mower stays in business use!
0 coins
Omar Fawaz
•Oof, that's rough. How did the IRS find out about the usage change? Did you get audited or was there some kind of reporting requirement I should know about?
0 coins