Strange SunLife insurance accounts in Hong Kong - Need help with FBAR amendments and determining income for streamlined disclosure vs simple 6-year amendment
So I just realized something concerning about my partner's insurance accounts in Hong Kong that's giving me a major headache. For years, I thought these SunLife insurance accounts weren't reportable on FBAR because they seemed "locked in" and not like regular accounts with liquidity - basically not really "their" money in the traditional sense. Well, turns out I was completely wrong about this! Now I need to amend our FBARs and also our 8938 forms. We've been properly filing FBARs for all their regular HK bank accounts over the years, and we filed 8938 whenever those accounts exceeded the threshold amounts. What I'm struggling with now is figuring out whether there's been any reportable income from these SunLife insurance accounts. I need to determine if I should go the streamlined disclosure route or if I can just do a simple 6-year amendment to fix this mess. I've been researching online but getting conflicting information about how these types of foreign insurance products are treated for US tax purposes. Has anyone dealt with foreign life insurance accounts, specifically from Hong Kong? Any insights on whether policy growth is considered income even if not withdrawn? Really appreciate any help since I'm trying to get ahead of this before the IRS comes knocking!
18 comments


Ravi Sharma
This is a situation that requires careful handling but isn't as uncommon as you might think. First, you're correct that these insurance accounts should have been reported on FBAR (FinCEN 114) and potentially Form 8938 depending on the value. For determining whether there's been income, it depends on the specific type of SunLife policy. If these are cash value life insurance policies, they may generate what's called "passive income" even if no money was withdrawn. Under US tax rules, foreign insurance policies often don't qualify for the same tax-deferred treatment as US policies unless they meet specific requirements. If the policy has been accumulating cash value, that annual increase might be considered taxable phantom income under the PFIC rules (Passive Foreign Investment Company). Alternatively, if structured more like an annuity, it could fall under different reporting requirements. I'd recommend gathering all policy statements showing year-by-year growth and consulting with a tax professional who specializes in expat issues before deciding between streamlined procedures or simple FBAR amendments. The streamlined procedures offer protection from penalties but require a certification that the failure was non-willful.
0 coins
NebulaNomad
•Thanks for your response! This is really helpful. I'm still confused about how to determine if these policies fall under PFIC rules though. The documentation is all in Chinese, and while my partner can read it, the terminology doesn't translate well to US tax concepts. Is there a specific document or section we should look for that would indicate if it's generating passive income? Also, do you know if amending just the past 6 years of FBARs is sufficient, or do we need to go back further?
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
•For determining PFIC status, look for anything showing investment components within the policy - these SunLife products often have underlying mutual funds or investment vehicles. If your policy statements show how money is being allocated to different investments, that's a red flag for PFIC treatment. Even with Chinese documentation, look for graphs or charts showing growth components or investment allocations. For FBAR amendments, the statute of limitations is generally 6 years, so amending the last 6 years is typically sufficient unless there was willful non-compliance. However, if you're going the streamlined route, the current requirement is to file 3 years of amended tax returns and 6 years of FBARs.
0 coins
Freya Thomsen
I ran into almost this exact same situation with my wife's insurance policies from Taiwan! I spent weeks going back and forth with accountants trying to figure out the right approach, until I found https://taxr.ai which literally saved me thousands in accounting fees. Their system analyzed all the policy documents and gave me a clear determination on whether there was reportable income. What was super helpful is they have experience with Asian insurance products specifically and understood the unique aspects of these policies that most US accountants don't. I uploaded the policy statements (even the ones in Chinese) and their analysis broke down exactly which components needed reporting and which didn't. They were able to definitively tell me that I needed PFIC reporting for some policy components. They also provided a letter explaining their analysis that I included with my amendments which I think will help tremendously if I ever get questioned about it.
0 coins
Omar Fawaz
•That sounds promising. Did they help you decide between doing the streamlined disclosure vs. just amending previous FBARs? That's the part I'm struggling with most - determining if there's a material tax difference or just a reporting oversight.
0 coins
Chloe Martin
•I'm a bit skeptical about these online services handling something this complicated. Did they actually give you tax advice or just document analysis? And how did they handle the foreign language documents? I've got some insurance policies from Japan and I'm in a similar situation.
0 coins
Freya Thomsen
•For determining between streamlined vs. simple amendments, they helped me understand the risk factors of each approach based on my specific situation. In my case, they identified that some of my wife's policies had generated phantom income that should have been reported, which pushed me toward the streamlined program rather than just fixing the FBARs. Regarding the foreign language documents, I was skeptical too initially, but they have a system that can extract the numerical data and financial structures even from foreign language documents. They don't translate everything, but they focus on the financial data points that matter for US tax reporting. It's not just document review - they provide an analysis of your specific tax situation based on the documents. I uploaded policy statements, annual summaries, and some account details, and they were able to piece together the tax implications.
0 coins
Chloe Martin
I just wanted to follow up about my experience with taxr.ai after my skeptical question earlier. I decided to give them a try with my Japanese insurance policies since I was getting nowhere with my regular accountant. I'm genuinely impressed with how thorough their analysis was! They identified that two of my policies had investment components that qualified as PFICs, but the third was a pure term life policy with no reporting requirements beyond FBAR. They also caught that one policy had a small withdrawal in 2021 that counted as income (which I had completely missed). They recommended the streamlined procedure in my case due to the missed income, and provided all the documentation I needed for the submission. I was expecting some generic advice, but they actually customized everything to my specific policies and situation. Worth every penny for the peace of mind alone.
0 coins
Diego Rojas
Having gone through a similar issue with insurance policies in Singapore, I can tell you the IRS hotline is absolutely useless for these complex international questions. I spent 6+ hours on hold over multiple days trying to get clarification, only to be transferred between departments and ultimately given contradictory information. If you need to speak directly with the IRS about this (which I eventually did to confirm my approach), use https://claimyr.com instead of wasting days on hold. You can see how it works at https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c - they basically hold your place in the IRS queue and call you when an agent is available. I was skeptical but it actually worked - got a call back in about 2 hours when I had been on hold for 4+ hours on my own attempts. The agent I spoke with confirmed that for my case, I needed to report the inside buildup of the policies as phantom income, which pushed me toward the streamlined disclosure route.
0 coins
Anastasia Sokolov
•Wait, there's a service that will wait on hold with the IRS for you? That sounds too good to be true. Does it actually work for international issues? I've been dealing with my own foreign account problems and the thought of calling the IRS makes me want to cry.
0 coins
StarSeeker
•I don't get it - how does this service actually work? Do they have some special access to the IRS that regular people don't? And why would the IRS even give you accurate info on something this complex? They barely understand their own rules half the time.
0 coins
Diego Rojas
•Yes, it actually works for international issues! I initially called the International Taxpayer line at the IRS myself and waited over 3 hours before getting disconnected. With Claimyr, they navigated the phone tree and waited in the queue, then called me when they had an agent on the line. They don't have special access - they're just using technology to wait in the phone queue for you. It's basically a service that monitors the hold music and calls you when a human picks up. They can't help with the accuracy of information you get, but at least you don't waste half your day on hold just to ask your questions.
0 coins
StarSeeker
I need to eat my words from my skeptical comment. After my third attempt trying to call the IRS myself (disconnected after 1.5 hours on hold), I tried Claimyr out of desperation. Got a call back in about 90 minutes with an actual IRS international tax specialist on the line. The agent was able to clarify that in my specific situation, I needed to go the streamlined route because some of my foreign accounts had generated over $8,500 in unreported income over the years. She also explained exactly which forms I needed for the insurance accounts (8621 for the investment portions that are PFICs and 8938 for the reporting). Having an actual conversation with a knowledgeable IRS agent made all the difference - yes they have their limitations, but speaking to a human who could address my specific questions saved me from making a costly mistake in how I handled the amendments.
0 coins
Sean O'Donnell
Another thing to consider - I went through this with Malaysian insurance policies - is whether these accounts might be considered foreign grantor trusts requiring Form 3520/3520-A filings. Some Asian insurance products are structured in ways that trigger these requirements under US tax law. The penalties for missing these forms are MUCH higher than FBAR penalties ($10,000 minimum), so definitely figure this out before just amending FBARs. In my case, I had to file delinquent 3520s along with my streamlined disclosure.
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
•I hadn't even considered the trust angle! Do you know what specific features of your Malaysian policies triggered the 3520 requirements? Were they whole life policies with investment components or something else? This adds a whole new layer of complexity I need to look into.
0 coins
Sean O'Donnell
•My policies were whole life with investment components, but what triggered the 3520 requirements was the specific contractual structure. The policies were technically held in a separate account managed by trustees, even though I was the beneficiary. Some Asian insurance companies use trust structures for tax efficiency in their local markets, not realizing it creates a nightmare for US taxpayers. Look for any mention of "trust," "trustee," or separate legal entities in your policy documents. If your partner directly owns the policies in their name, you might be safe from 3520 requirements, but if there's any intermediary entity, that's a red flag.
0 coins
Zara Ahmed
Has anyone here dealt specifically with determining if the cash value growth in these policies should be reported annually as income? My accountant says yes, but my financial advisor in Hong Kong insists these shouldn't be taxable until withdrawal under Hong Kong-US tax treaties.
0 coins
Luca Esposito
•Unfortunately, your Hong Kong advisor is likely applying HK tax rules, not US ones. The US-HK tax agreements don't provide the protection they're suggesting. For US tax purposes, foreign life insurance policies rarely qualify for the same tax-deferred treatment as US policies. The annual growth (inside buildup) of cash value in foreign policies is generally taxable phantom income for US taxpayers unless the policy meets strict requirements under IRC 7702. Almost no foreign policies meet these requirements since they're designed for their local markets. Your accountant is probably right about reporting the growth.
0 coins