State tax implications for Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) - anyone know the rules?
I've been trying to diversify my portfolio and recently started looking into Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs). From what I understand, these are traded like stocks but the partnership itself doesn't pay taxes - instead, earnings and losses get passed to partners via K-1 forms rather than 1099-DIVs. I've been eyeing Energy Transfer (ET) as a potential MLP investment, but I'm confused about the state tax implications. Since MLPs can generate income across multiple states, it seems like this could create a filing nightmare for small investors. A few questions that I can't seem to find clear answers on: 1. If an MLP has a small loss or minimal income apportioned to my state (let's say Virginia), am I really expected to file state taxes there? Does anyone actually do this for just a few dollars of income or loss? 2. Many MLPs seem to structure distributions as return of capital, which lowers your cost basis but isn't immediately taxable until you sell or basis goes negative. Are these distributions treated like regular capital gains at the state level outside your home state? 3. For MLPs in IRAs - I understand there's a $1000 threshold for Unrelated Business Income that triggers taxes. Does the IRA custodian handle all the state filings too? What happens if you have multiple IRAs at different custodians that collectively exceed the threshold? 4. In an IRA, is return of capital considered Unrelated Business Income, or is it untaxed? Investment sites seem to discuss MLPs as if they're straightforward investments, but the tax implications, especially at the state level, seem incredibly complex for individual investors. Anyone have experience with this?
18 comments


Emma Swift
While MLPs can be attractive investments for their yield and tax-deferred distributions, you're right that the tax complexity is substantial - especially at the state level. From my experience working with clients who hold MLPs: 1. Technically, you're required to file in any state where the MLP operates and apportions income to you. In practice, many states have minimum filing thresholds (often around $1,000 of income), and many small investors don't file for minimal amounts. This is a compliance risk, but enforcement for small amounts is typically low. Still, you're legally obligated to file if required. 2. Return of capital distributions are generally treated similarly across federal and state taxes - they reduce your basis but aren't immediately taxable until you sell or basis goes negative. Most states follow federal treatment here, but there are exceptions. 3. For MLPs in IRAs, the custodian should handle filing Form 990-T for Unrelated Business Taxable Income (UBTI) exceeding $1,000. They typically handle both federal and state filings, but the multi-custodian issue is real - each custodian only knows about their own accounts, so you could exceed the threshold collectively. In that case, technically you would need to ensure proper filings. 4. Return of capital itself isn't UBTI, but if the MLP generates UBTI (operating income), that flows through regardless of how they classify distributions.
0 coins
Isabella Tucker
•Can you clarify something about point #1? If I own a tiny amount of an MLP that operates in 20 states, am I really expected to file 20 separate state tax returns? That seems insane for a small investor. Do people actually do this?
0 coins
Emma Swift
•While technically you might need to file in all states where the MLP operates, there are practical considerations that make this less burdensome. Many states have filing thresholds based on income amounts or minimum tax liabilities - if your portion of MLP income for a particular state falls below these thresholds, you may not need to file there. Most small investors with minimal MLP holdings typically focus on complying with their home state plus any states with significant income allocation. Some MLPs offer composite return filing services for partners, where they handle state tax filings on behalf of investors for an additional fee. This can greatly simplify the process if you're concerned about multi-state compliance.
0 coins
Jayden Hill
After dealing with the tax nightmare from owning MLPs for years, I found https://taxr.ai incredibly helpful for sorting out all the K-1 madness. I was in a similar situation - owned Energy Transfer and a couple other MLPs and got completely lost trying to figure out the state tax implications. The platform basically analyzed all my K-1s and identified which states actually required me to file based on my specific situation. Turns out I only needed to worry about 3 states rather than the 15+ where the MLPs operated because of various thresholds and exemptions. It saved me from either overfiling or potentially missing required filings. The tool was especially helpful with figuring out the return of capital adjustments to my basis and tracking those changes year over year. Before finding this, I was spending hours trying to reconcile everything manually.
0 coins
LordCommander
•How does it handle the IRA situation with UBTI? I have a few MLPs in my retirement accounts and I'm worried my custodian isn't properly calculating the state tax implications.
0 coins
Lucy Lam
•Does it actually do the state filings for you or just tell you which ones you need to file? Because knowing where to file is helpful but I still don't want to deal with 5+ state tax returns.
0 coins
Jayden Hill
•It doesn't directly file your taxes but it prepares detailed reports showing exactly where you need to file based on your K-1 data and the specific state thresholds. For your IRA question, it can analyze your MLP investments to determine if you're approaching the UBTI threshold across accounts, which helps you know if you need to contact your custodians about potential filings. For state returns, it generates the data you need to complete each required filing, which you can either handle yourself or provide to your tax preparer. This eliminated most of the confusion for me - instead of guessing which states needed attention, I had clear guidance on exactly where to file and what numbers to report.
0 coins
LordCommander
Just wanted to follow up about my experience with taxr.ai after the recommendation here. I was skeptical at first since I've been burned by tax software that claims to handle complex situations but falls short. I uploaded my K-1s from the MLPs in both my taxable and IRA accounts, and it actually identified that my combined UBTI across my Fidelity and Vanguard IRAs was going to exceed the $1,000 threshold, which neither custodian would have caught on their own. This let me proactively contact both to ensure the proper 990-T filings happened. It also clarified which of my distributions were actually return of capital vs. ordinary income, which helped me understand my true tax situation. For my taxable account MLPs, it narrowed down my state filing requirements to just 3 states where my allocated income exceeded the minimums. Definitely worth it for MLP investors.
0 coins
Aidan Hudson
If you're struggling to get through to the IRS about MLP taxation issues (which I was for MONTHS), I discovered a service called https://claimyr.com that actually got me connected to a real IRS agent after weeks of failed attempts. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c When I received K-1s showing negative income from MLPs in multiple states, I had specific questions about my filing obligations that weren't covered in any publication. I tried calling the IRS directly for weeks but kept getting disconnected or told to call back later. Claimyr got me through to an agent within a day, and they confirmed that while technically I needed to file in states with losses, there were practical thresholds where the IRS wouldn't be concerned about compliance. The agent also clarified how the UBTI rules work for MLPs in IRAs across multiple custodians, which was incredibly helpful for planning purposes.
0 coins
Zoe Wang
•How does this actually work? Doesn't the IRS just use a queue system? How can a third-party service get you through faster?
0 coins
Connor Richards
•This sounds like a scam. The IRS doesn't give priority access to people using third-party services. And even if you did get through, I doubt a phone rep would give you binding advice about multi-state MLP filing requirements.
0 coins
Aidan Hudson
•The service doesn't provide "priority access" - they use an automated system that calls the IRS repeatedly and navigates the phone tree until they get through, then they call you to connect you with the agent. It saves you from having to manually redial and go through the menu system dozens of times. The IRS agent obviously couldn't give official binding advice for every state's requirements, but they provided general guidance about federal reporting expectations and practical enforcement thresholds. They also directed me to specific IRS publications addressing UBTI in IRAs that helped clarify my situation. There's nothing magical about it - it's just a way to avoid spending hours on hold or getting disconnected repeatedly.
0 coins
Connor Richards
I have to admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After posting my skeptical comment, I decided to try it anyway because I was desperate to talk to someone about my MLP situation in my IRA. Not only did I get connected to an IRS agent within a couple hours (after trying for weeks on my own), but the agent was able to walk me through exactly how to handle the UBTI situation with my multiple IRAs. They confirmed that while each custodian is responsible for filing Form 990-T if UBTI exceeds $1,000 in their specific accounts, I needed to notify my custodians if my overall UBTI across all accounts exceeded the threshold. They also explained the practical reality of state filing requirements for small MLP investments, which saved me from potentially filing unnecessary returns. I'm still dealing with the complexities of MLPs, but at least now I have clear direction on how to proceed.
0 coins
Grace Durand
I've been investing in MLPs for about 5 years now and here's my practical approach to the state tax issue: 1) I only file state returns where my allocated income from the MLP exceeds $500. This is technically not compliant with every state's rules, but it's a reasonable threshold where the tax liability becomes meaningful enough to justify filing. 2) For states with small allocations, I maintain records in case of audit but don't file. So far, no issues. 3) For MLPs in IRAs, I specifically choose ones with historically low UBTI to avoid triggering the $1,000 threshold. Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) has been good for this. 4) I keep detailed basis records for return of capital distributions, as these will eventually matter when I sell. Not saying this is the "correct" approach legally, but it's worked for me as a practical compromise between full compliance and sanity.
0 coins
Steven Adams
•Which tax software do you use that can handle the multiple state filings for MLPs? I tried using TurboTax last year and it was a nightmare.
0 coins
Grace Durand
•I actually use a combination of H&R Block Premium for my home state and federal returns, then I use individual state's web filing systems for the few out-of-state returns I need to submit. Most tax software struggles with the complexity of MLP state allocations. For tracking basis adjustments from return of capital distributions, I maintain my own spreadsheet since no tax software I've found does this well across multiple years. It's not ideal, but it gives me more control and understanding of my tax situation than relying entirely on software that might not handle these edge cases correctly.
0 coins
Alice Fleming
For anyone considering MLPs, please know that while the tax complexity is real, it's manageable if you approach it systematically. A few tips from my experience: 1. Request the "investor tax package" from each MLP you own - most provide detailed state-by-state breakdowns of your allocations 2. Focus on your home state plus any states with significant operations by your MLPs 3. Keep excellent records of your basis adjustments from return of capital distributions 4. Consider using an accountant experienced with MLP investments rather than DIY software 5. For small investments, ETFs that hold MLPs like AMLP might be more tax-efficient as they issue 1099s instead of K-1s
0 coins
Hassan Khoury
•Doesn't using MLP ETFs defeat the tax advantages of MLPs though? I thought the whole point was the tax-deferred distributions and the structure that avoids double taxation.
0 coins