< Back to IRS

Santiago Martinez

Filing K1 for MLP (Energy Transfer) - Confused about partnership breakdown for Turbotax

I'm really lost this year with my Energy Transfer K1. Last year I thought I had it down, but now TurboTax is asking me different questions and I'm scared I'll mess everything up. From what I can tell, the K1 shows the total of all 3 partnerships for ET, and then the next page breaks down the specifics for each company (ET, USAC, SUN). What I've been assuming is that I need to enter these as three separate partnerships with their own K1 information based on that breakdown sheet. Basically ignoring the main K1 that shows everything added together. Each one should appear as its own Partnership in TurboTax. But now TurboTax is asking me some questions I don't remember from last year and I'm second-guessing myself. Am I supposed to be entering these as separate entities or combining them somehow? The documentation isn't very clear and I don't want to get hit with penalties for doing this wrong. I only have like 50 units of ET but the tax stuff is so complicated! Has anyone dealt with Energy Transfer MLPs before? Any guidance would be super appreciated!

You're on the right track! Energy Transfer (ET) is a Master Limited Partnership that owns interests in other partnerships (USAC and SUN), which is why your K-1 has that combined page followed by the breakdowns. Your assumption is correct - you should enter each partnership separately using the breakdown information. Don't use the combined totals page for your entries. Each entity needs to be reported individually in TurboTax with its own K-1 information. TurboTax might be asking additional questions this year because there could have been changes to how they handle MLP reporting or because your specific situation triggered different questions. The tax treatment of MLPs can get quite complex with things like passive activity limitations, at-risk limitations, and basis calculations. What specific questions is TurboTax asking that are confusing you? That might help narrow down what's throwing you off.

0 coins

Thanks for confirming I'm at least partially on the right track! The questions that threw me off were about "publicly traded partnerships" and something about "multiple activities." Then it asked if I had disposed of my entire interest in the partnership, which I haven't. Then there was another section asking about Section 751 gains that I don't remember from last year. I'm wondering if I need to check these boxes or if they're just asking because the software doesn't know what kind of K1 I'm entering yet?

0 coins

Yes, those questions are normal for MLP entries in TurboTax. Energy Transfer is indeed a publicly traded partnership, so you should select "yes" for that question. For the multiple activities question, you should also select "yes" since ET has multiple business activities across its structure, which is reflected in the breakdown you mentioned. For the question about disposing your entire interest, since you haven't sold all your units, select "no." This question appears because special tax rules apply when you completely exit an MLP investment. The Section 751 gain question relates to what's sometimes called "hot assets" that get special tax treatment when sold. If you haven't sold any units, this wouldn't apply to you. The software is just covering all possible MLP scenarios, which is why you're seeing questions that may not be relevant to your specific situation.

0 coins

Nick Kravitz

•

After struggling with MLP K-1s for years (I have ET, EPD, and MPLX), I discovered https://taxr.ai which has been a lifesaver for dealing with these complicated forms. Last tax season, I uploaded my Energy Transfer K-1 and it automatically detected all three partnerships and explained exactly how to enter them correctly in TurboTax. The site analyzed my K-1 and showed me which boxes needed special attention, especially for the basis calculations which are critical for MLPs. It even flagged that I had been calculating my basis incorrectly for years, potentially saving me from an audit. What I really liked is that it explained why each partnership needed to be entered separately and how the distributions affect my cost basis going forward. Makes tax time way less stressful!

0 coins

Hannah White

•

Does it work with other tax software too? I use H&R Block and have similar problems with my ET and EQT partnership K-1s every year.

0 coins

Michael Green

•

I'm a bit skeptical about using a third-party site with my tax info. How secure is it? Do you have to give them your entire return or just the K-1?

0 coins

Nick Kravitz

•

It absolutely works with H&R Block and pretty much any tax software. The instructions it gives are generic enough that you can apply them to whatever program you're using. The analysis breaks down each box and explains what it means regardless of which software you enter it into. You only need to upload the K-1 itself, not your entire return. The site uses bank-level encryption for uploads and doesn't store your documents after analysis (according to their privacy policy). I was concerned about that too initially, but the K-1 is already a document that was sent to the IRS anyway, so the sensitive information exposure is minimal compared to uploading a full tax return.

0 coins

Hannah White

•

I wanted to follow up after trying taxr.ai for my Energy Transfer and EQT K-1s! Holy crap, this saved me so much time and confusion. I've been doing my K-1s wrong for three years apparently! The breakdown for each partnership entity was super clear and it flagged that I needed to track my basis separately for each one. It also helped me understand why I was getting those passive activity loss limitations that were carrying over each year. For anyone struggling with MLPs on their taxes, definitely worth checking out. My H&R Block return is now showing a completely different (and larger) return amount after I fixed my entries!

0 coins

Mateo Silva

•

If you get stuck or need clarification directly from the IRS about MLP reporting (which I did last year), I recommend using https://claimyr.com to get through to an IRS agent. I spent 3 days trying to call them myself about my Energy Transfer K-1 issues and kept getting disconnected or waiting for hours. Claimyr held my place in line and called me when an agent was available. Saved me literally hours of hold time! You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The IRS agent I spoke with walked me through exactly how to report multiple partnerships from a single MLP K-1 and explained why my basis calculations were wrong for the previous year. They even helped me understand if I needed to file an amended return (thankfully I didn't).

0 coins

How long did it take for them to actually get you connected to someone? I'm filing kind of last minute and don't have days to wait...

0 coins

This sounds like a scam. Why would I pay a service to call the IRS when I can just call them myself? Has anyone else actually used this or is this just marketing?

0 coins

Mateo Silva

•

For me it took about 2 hours total, compared to the multiple days I spent getting disconnected when trying myself. They basically hold your place in the queue and call you when they're about to connect you. Much better than sitting on hold listening to that awful music for hours! I understand the skepticism - I felt the same way at first. But the service just automates the hold process. You still talk directly to the IRS yourself. They don't get involved in your tax situation at all. They just handle the horrible hold time problem and then connect you directly once there's an actual human on the line.

0 coins

I have to post a follow up - I was clearly wrong about Claimyr. After another frustrating day of trying to reach the IRS myself about my MLP questions (kept getting the "due to high call volume" message), I reluctantly tried the service. It actually worked exactly as described. They called me back about 90 minutes later when they had an IRS agent on the line. The agent confirmed that I needed to enter each partnership (ET, USAC, SUN) separately in my software, and explained how to handle the basis adjustments properly. I'm still annoyed I had to use a service to reach a government agency, but it definitely saved me hours of frustration and helped me get my MLP K-1 questions resolved.

0 coins

Cameron Black

•

Don't forget that your basis in these MLP units is SUPER important to track year after year. Energy Transfer (and most MLPs) typically distribute more cash than taxable income, which means part of your distribution is tax-free but reduces your basis. I learned this the hard way when I sold some ET units after 5 years and realized I hadn't been tracking my basis properly. I had to go back through 5 years of K-1s to recalculate everything. Make sure you're keeping a spreadsheet or some other record of your adjusted basis after each tax year. Your basis will typically go down each year due to those tax-free distributions, and can even go negative in some cases.

0 coins

What happens if your basis does go negative? I've had ET for about 7 years and I've never tracked the basis changes. Do I need to go back and fix previous tax returns or just start tracking now?

0 coins

Cameron Black

•

If your basis goes negative, those additional reductions actually become taxable as capital gains in the year they go below zero. The IRS considers this a "deemed sale" even though you haven't actually sold the units. You don't need to amend previous returns for not tracking basis - the reporting of basis adjustments on your tax returns was correct if you properly entered the K-1 information each year. What you do need to do is reconstruct what your current basis is by reviewing all your past K-1s, purchase records, and any sales you've made. Start with your original purchase price, then for each year, reduce the basis by the tax-free portion of distributions (usually shown in Box 19A of the K-1 as "distributions in excess of income") and increase it by any income allocated to you that you paid tax on. It's tedious work, but essential for when you eventually sell.

0 coins

Has anyone used the "MLP Basis Worksheet" that TurboTax provides for this? I found it last year and it seemed helpful, but I'm not sure if I'm filling it out correctly. It asks for previous year basis but I don't have that number handy.

0 coins

Ruby Garcia

•

The worksheet is helpful but you absolutely need your ending basis from the previous year to use it properly. If you used TurboTax last year too, you might be able to find that number in last year's return - look for Form 8949 or the Partnership section. If you can't find it, you'll need to recalculate from when you first purchased the MLP units. It's a pain but necessary to get accurate tax treatment, especially if you plan to sell any units in the future.

0 coins

Thanks for the tip. I managed to find last year's form and get the ending basis. The worksheet does make it easier to keep track year to year. I just wish TurboTax would automatically carry this information forward instead of making me hunt for it every time!

0 coins

Ev Luca

•

One more thing to add about Energy Transfer specifically - make sure you're looking at the correct year's K-1 form. ET has had some structural changes over the years, and the partnership breakdown format has evolved. For 2024, they should still be showing the three entities (ET, USAC, SUN) on the breakdown page like you mentioned. But I've noticed they sometimes release amended K-1s if there are corrections, so double-check that you have the most recent version before filing. Also, when you're entering each partnership separately in TurboTax, pay close attention to the EIN (Employer Identification Number) for each entity on the breakdown page. Make sure you're using the correct EIN for each partnership entry - this is how the IRS matches your return to what the partnerships reported about you. The complexity is definitely frustrating for what seems like it should be a straightforward investment, but you're handling it correctly by treating each as a separate partnership!

0 coins

Daryl Bright

•

This is really helpful advice about checking for amended K-1s! I actually didn't realize Energy Transfer sometimes issues corrections. Is there a specific place to check for these, or do they just mail out replacements? Also, regarding the EINs for each entity - I've been using the main ET EIN for all three partnerships because I wasn't sure where to find the individual ones. Are the separate EINs clearly labeled on the breakdown page, or do I need to look elsewhere on the form? I'm definitely feeling more confident about entering these as separate partnerships now, but want to make sure I'm using the right identification numbers for each one. Thanks for all the detailed guidance everyone!

0 coins

Sean Matthews

•

For amended K-1s, Energy Transfer typically sends them by mail if there are corrections, but you can also check their investor relations website under "Tax Information" for the most current versions. They usually post any amendments there with clear dates showing when they were issued. Regarding the EINs - you're right to be confused about this! On the breakdown page, each partnership entity should have its own EIN listed, but sometimes it's not super obvious. Look for a section that shows something like "Partnership EIN" or "Employer ID" for each of the three entities (ET, USAC, SUN). If you can't find separate EINs clearly listed, you might need to use the main ET EIN for all three entries, but definitely double-check the form carefully. If the EINs aren't clearly separated on your breakdown page, that might be one of those questions worth asking the IRS about directly, since using the wrong EIN could cause matching issues later. Better to get it right the first time than deal with notices later!

0 coins

Just wanted to add a quick note about the Section 199A deduction that might apply to your Energy Transfer K-1. MLPs like ET often qualify for the qualified business income (QBI) deduction, which can reduce your taxable income by up to 20% of the partnership income. When you're entering each partnership separately (ET, USAC, SUN), make sure you're looking for any Section 199A information on the K-1 breakdown pages. This is usually reported in Box 20 with various codes. TurboTax should pick this up automatically when you enter the K-1 information correctly, but it's worth double-checking since this deduction can be pretty significant. The deduction has income limitations and other complexities, but for most individual investors with moderate MLP holdings, it can provide meaningful tax savings. Just another reason to make sure you're entering all the partnership information accurately!

0 coins

This is a great point about the Section 199A deduction! I completely forgot about this when I was dealing with my ET K-1 last year. I think I might have missed out on some tax savings because I wasn't paying attention to Box 20. For someone new to MLP investing like me, can you clarify - does the 199A deduction apply to each partnership entity separately, or is it calculated on the combined income from all three (ET, USAC, SUN)? I want to make sure I'm not double-counting or missing anything when I enter these as separate partnerships in TurboTax. Also, are there any red flags I should watch for that might limit my ability to claim this deduction? I've heard there are income thresholds but I'm not sure exactly how they work with partnership income.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today