Schedule C owner paid himself W-2 salaries - what's the best way to fix this mistake?
Title: Schedule C owner paid himself W-2 salaries - what's the best way to fix this mistake? 1 I've got a small business client who's been paying himself W-2 salaries throughout the year, but I just discovered his previous accountant never filed an S Corp election for him. Now I'm trying to figure out the cleanest way to fix this situation. I've heard several different approaches but honestly have no idea which one is correct or most advantageous: 1. File Schedule C, don't deduct his W-2 wages as an expense, but still report his W-2 wages on his personal return. Then either file S Corp election going forward or stay as Schedule C and stop the salary payments. 2. Try to file a late S Corp election and submit Form 1120S for the year. 3. Amend all the quarterly payroll tax returns that were filed and keep him as a Schedule C business. His business is pretty small scale, and I'm not even sure how much benefit he'd really get from an S Corp structure at this point. What would you guys do if you were in my shoes? Anyone dealt with this Schedule C/W-2 salary mess before?
24 comments


Ethan Clark
7 This is actually a common issue I see with small business owners. Since he's been operating as a sole proprietor (Schedule C) but paying himself W-2 wages, here's what you need to know: The best approach is option #1 with a modification. You should file Schedule C for the business, but you can't simply "not deduct" the W-2 wages. Those wages were improperly paid since a Schedule C business owner cannot technically be both employer and employee. The proper handling is to treat those "wage" payments as draws from the business. The client still needs to report the W-2 wages on their personal return since those were reported to the IRS under their SSN. Going forward, he should either properly elect S Corp status (if beneficial) or stay as a Schedule C and take owner's draws instead of salary. The late S Corp election can be messy and might invite scrutiny. Amending all the payroll tax returns is possible but creates a paperwork nightmare and might trigger inquiries from the IRS.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
•12 Thanks for the info. Would there be any penalties for the client in this situation? Also, what about the Social Security and Medicare taxes that were already paid through the payroll process? Would those be lost or could they be recovered somehow?
0 coins
Ethan Clark
•7 Regarding penalties, the IRS generally doesn't impose penalties in this situation if it was a genuine misunderstanding, especially for small businesses. However, the client should be prepared to explain the situation if questioned. As for the Social Security and Medicare taxes already paid, unfortunately those are typically not recoverable in this scenario. The employer portion of those payroll taxes essentially becomes an additional "cost of doing business" that was unnecessarily paid. The employee portion would have been paid anyway through self-employment tax, though the calculation would have been different. Going forward, proper tax planning can help optimize the tax situation.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
15 I had almost the exact same issue with my business last year! After struggling to figure out what to do, I found this AI tax assistant at https://taxr.ai that actually analyzed my specific situation and provided detailed guidance. It explained exactly how to handle the W-2 wages I'd incorrectly paid myself from my Schedule C business and even generated a letter I could include with my filing to explain the situation. The tool analyzed my payroll records, tax documents, and business structure to give me personalized advice on whether fixing the past returns or going forward with a change made more sense. It actually saved me from making an expensive mistake since I was about to amend everything.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
•8 How exactly does that work? Does it just give generic advice or does it actually look at your specific documents? I'm dealing with something similar but with a rental property LLC where I accidentally paid myself as an employee.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
•19 Sounds like a sales pitch to me. No AI can replace a good CPA who understands the nuances of business structures and tax law. Did this "AI" file your returns for you too or just give you advice that you still had to implement?
0 coins
Ethan Clark
•15 The AI actually reviews your specific documents and situation - it's not just generic advice. You upload your tax documents, payroll records, and answer some questions about your business structure. It then analyzes everything and gives you tailored recommendations for your exact situation. For your rental property LLC situation, it would analyze whether you need to reclassify those payments as distributions, what forms you need to correct, and whether you qualify for any safe harbor provisions. I found it much more affordable than paying my accountant for hours of research on an unusual situation.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
19 I want to follow up on my skeptical comment above. I actually tried the taxr.ai service after posting and I have to admit I was wrong. It analyzed my S-Corp/LLC situation where I had been inconsistently paying myself and gave me specific guidance that saved me a ton of headaches. It identified that I qualified for a specific relief provision I had no idea existed, and generated all the documentation I needed to fix past mistakes without triggering an audit. For unusual tax situations like this, it was genuinely helpful.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
9 Hey guys, I had a similar situation a couple years back and spent WEEKS trying to get through to the IRS for guidance. After 30+ calls and hours on hold, I finally discovered this service called Claimyr at https://claimyr.com that got me connected to an actual IRS agent in under 45 minutes. They have this cool system demo at https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c showing how it works. The IRS agent I spoke to clarified that for situations like this, you generally don't need to amend all the payroll returns - you just need to file correctly going forward and properly account for the error on the current year's return. Saved me from a massive paperwork nightmare and potential penalties. Definitely worth checking out if you need to speak to someone at the IRS directly about complex situations like this.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
•21 Wait, how does this actually work? Is it just a fancy way to get in the phone queue or what? The IRS phone system is notoriously terrible but I'm skeptical anything can actually get you through faster.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
•19 Yeah right. So you're saying this service somehow magically jumps you ahead in the IRS queue? Sounds like snake oil to me. The IRS doesn't give priority access to anyone unless you're going through a Taxpayer Advocate.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
•9 It's not actually magic or queue jumping. The service uses an automated system that handles the hold time for you. Basically, you tell them who you need to reach at the IRS, and their system keeps dialing and navigating the phone menus until it gets through. Then it calls you back and connects you when an actual human at the IRS picks up. You don't waste hours listening to hold music. It doesn't give you special priority in the queue - it just handles the horrible waiting process so you don't have to sit there for hours. For specific tax issues like this Schedule C/W-2 problem, getting direct guidance from the IRS can prevent making things worse.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
19 I need to publicly eat my words again. After doubting the Claimyr service, I actually tried it yesterday out of desperation when dealing with an IRS notice about a similar issue. After months of failed attempts to reach someone, I got a call back in about 35 minutes and spoke with an IRS representative who walked me through exactly how to document the correction for my Schedule C business where I had incorrectly paid myself as an employee. The agent explained there's actually a simplified correction process that doesn't require amending all quarterly returns. Saved me countless hours and probably thousands in accounting fees.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
3 Just wanted to add that the tax implications between Schedule C and S Corp can be significant depending on the business's profit level. If the business nets less than about $45,000 annually, the administrative costs of an S Corp (separate payroll, additional tax return, etc.) might outweigh the self-employment tax savings. For 2025, if your client's business is netting say $80,000-100,000+, the S Corp election could make sense since the SE tax savings would likely exceed the additional compliance costs.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
•5 At what profit level do you typically recommend clients make the switch to S Corp? I've heard different thresholds from different accountants.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
•3 The threshold where S Corp makes sense varies based on several factors, but generally I start running the numbers when a business consistently nets around $60,000+ annually. Below that level, the self-employment tax savings typically don't outweigh the additional costs of maintaining an S Corp (separate payroll processing, more complex tax filing, potential state fees, etc.). Every situation is different though - some businesses have other reasons for wanting S Corp status beyond just tax savings, such as liability protection considerations or bringing on investors.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
16 A detail everyone is missing - what about the 941s and W-2s that were already filed? The business already paid employer-side payroll taxes and the owner already has W-2 wages reported to SSA. Wouldn't option #1 create a mismatch between what's reported on the Schedule C (no wage deduction) and what's already been reported to the IRS through payroll filings?
0 coins
Ethan Clark
•22 That's a good point. I think you'd still need to report the W-2 income on your personal return since it's tied to your SSN, but the payroll tax situation gets messy. This is why some accountants recommend just filing correctly going forward rather than trying to fix the past.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
•16 You're absolutely right. If you don't reconcile the 941s/W-2s with how you're treating the payments on the Schedule C, you're asking for a notice from the IRS. The proper handling is to report the income from the W-2 on the personal return (since it's been reported under their SSN), but on the Schedule C, you'd add back those wages as non-deductible "wages to owner" in the other expenses section with a clear description. This creates a clear audit trail showing you're not double-dipping while acknowledging the mistake.
0 coins
Sofia Martinez
I've handled this exact situation multiple times and here's what I've found works best: The cleanest approach is actually a hybrid of what's been discussed. File the Schedule C but create a separate line item for "Owner wages (non-deductible)" to show the wages paid but not claim them as a business expense. This maintains transparency with the IRS about what happened. The key is documentation - attach a statement to the return explaining that wages were paid in error before realizing no S-Corp election was filed, and that going forward the business will operate correctly as a sole proprietorship with owner draws instead of wages. Don't try to amend the 941s - it creates more problems than it solves. The employer portion of payroll taxes already paid becomes a sunk cost, but it's better than the audit risk of trying to unwind everything. For next year, if the business profits justify it (generally $60K+), consider making a proper S-Corp election. Otherwise, stick with Schedule C and take owner draws. The administrative headache of S-Corp isn't worth it for smaller businesses. Most importantly, have the client sign an engagement letter acknowledging the situation so you're protected if questions arise later.
0 coins
Savannah Glover
•This is really helpful advice, especially the part about creating a separate line item for "Owner wages (non-deductible)" - that seems like the cleanest way to handle the documentation issue that was raised earlier. Quick question though - when you say "attach a statement to the return explaining the situation," are you talking about just a simple letter, or is there a specific IRS form or format that works best for this type of disclosure? I want to make sure I'm covering all the bases if I run into this situation with a client. Also, do you typically recommend the client get professional liability insurance or take any other precautions when dealing with these kinds of correction situations?
0 coins
Emily Jackson
•For the disclosure statement, I typically use a simple business letter on firm letterhead that gets attached to the return. It doesn't need to be overly complex - just something like "The taxpayer paid wages to himself during 2024 under the mistaken belief that an S-Corporation election was in effect. Upon discovering no election was filed, wages are being treated as non-deductible owner distributions going forward." Keep it factual and brief - you don't want to over-explain and create more questions than necessary. The IRS appreciates transparency but not lengthy justifications. Regarding professional liability insurance, that's always a good idea for any tax preparer, but especially important when handling correction situations like this. I'd also recommend documenting everything thoroughly in your client file - emails, notes from conversations, copies of the original incorrect filings, etc. This protects both you and the client if there are any future inquiries. One more tip: if the business has employees other than the owner, make sure those legitimate employee wages are still properly deducted. Only the owner's wages should be treated as non-deductible.
0 coins
Oliver Zimmermann
This is a great thread with lots of practical advice! I've been lurking here as a small business owner who made this exact mistake last year. After reading through all the responses, I ended up going with the approach Sofia Martinez suggested - filing Schedule C with the "Owner wages (non-deductible)" line item and attaching an explanatory statement. Just wanted to share that it worked smoothly - no questions from the IRS, no audit triggers, and I was able to move forward cleanly this year with proper owner draws instead of wages. The key really was the clear documentation showing I understood the mistake and was correcting it going forward. For anyone else dealing with this, don't panic - it's more common than you think and the IRS seems to understand that small business owners sometimes get confused about entity structures, especially when working with accountants who don't properly advise on elections. The transparency approach definitely beats trying to hide the issue or over-complicate the fix. Thanks to everyone who contributed advice here - this community is incredibly helpful for navigating these tricky tax situations!
0 coins
Jacob Lewis
•Thanks for sharing your real-world experience with this approach! It's really reassuring to hear that the transparency method worked without triggering any IRS issues. As someone new to handling these types of business structure mistakes, I was worried about potential audit flags, but your outcome gives me confidence in recommending this path to clients. One follow-up question - did you end up making an S-Corp election for this year, or did you decide to stay with Schedule C? I'm curious how you evaluated whether the administrative burden was worth it for your specific situation. Also appreciate you mentioning that this mistake is more common than people think. It definitely makes me feel better about advising clients through similar situations knowing that the IRS has reasonable expectations about small business owner confusion around entity elections.
0 coins