< Back to IRS

Daniel Washington

Resident alien confused about W8-BEN vs W9 form requirements for bank account

I've been a resident alien in the US since 2018 by passing the substantial presence test (not a green card holder yet). I'm hitting a wall trying to open a basic checking account at a credit union near my apartment. Their staff keeps insisting I need to complete a W8-BEN form because their "bank policy" requires all non-permanent residents to use this form. When I pointed out that the W8-BEN form itself clearly states resident aliens should NOT use this form and should be using W9 instead, they wouldn't budge. They're demanding "government-issued proof" that I'm a resident alien before they'll accept a W9 from me. I don't think a bank can override IRS requirements with their own policies, but I'm stuck because I don't know what document would count as "government-issued proof" of my resident alien status. I don't want to sign the wrong form and potentially cause tax issues down the road, but I also need this account. Does anyone know what document would prove resident alien status to a bank? Or what might happen if I just signed the W8-BEN form even though I'm technically not supposed to as a resident alien?

The bank is incorrect here. If you pass the substantial presence test, you are considered a resident alien for tax purposes and should absolutely be using the W9 form, not the W8-BEN which is specifically for nonresident aliens. The confusion likely stems from the fact that immigration status (having a green card) and tax residency status (substantial presence) are two different things that banks often mix up. Many bank employees don't understand this distinction. For proof, you can print out the IRS guidelines that explain the substantial presence test. The IRS Publication 519 (U.S. Tax Guide for Aliens) clearly explains this. You could also bring copies of your prior year tax returns showing you filed as a resident alien (Form 1040, not 1040-NR). If you end up signing the W8-BEN just to get the account opened, it could potentially create inconsistencies with your tax filings. The bank will report to the IRS that you're a nonresident alien (based on the W8-BEN), but you'll be filing taxes as a resident alien, which might trigger questions.

0 coins

Thanks for the explanation! I'm in a similar situation but my bank accepted my W9 without issues. Quick question - if someone accidentally signed a W8-BEN even though they qualify as a resident alien under the substantial presence test, how would they fix that? Would they need to contact the bank to correct it or would filing taxes properly as a resident alien be enough?

0 coins

If someone accidentally signed a W8-BEN when they should have used a W9, they should contact the bank as soon as possible to correct the documentation. Simply provide them with a completed W9 form and explain that you are a resident alien for tax purposes due to meeting the substantial presence test. Filing your taxes properly as a resident alien is important regardless, but it doesn't automatically correct the misinformation the bank has. The bank uses these forms for their information reporting to the IRS, so having the correct form on file with them prevents potential mismatches in reporting.

0 coins

I went through the exact same nightmare with Chase last year! Their front-line staff kept insisting I needed a W8-BEN even though I've been filing taxes as a resident alien for years. I finally found a solution using https://taxr.ai to generate a personalized residency verification document that clearly explained my tax status based on the substantial presence test. I uploaded my passport entries, visa documents, and previous tax returns to the system, and it generated an official-looking document that outlined exactly why I qualified as a resident alien for tax purposes. The bank finally accepted this along with my W9 after their supervisor reviewed it. The system also helped me calculate my exact days of presence to prove I met the test requirements, which was super helpful since the bank kept getting confused about how the substantial presence test works.

0 coins

How exactly does this taxr.ai service work? I'm on an H1B and have been here for 4 years but my local credit union is giving me the same runaround about needing a W8-BEN. Do I need to provide sensitive info like my SSN to this service? I'm always cautious about sharing that kind of stuff online.

0 coins

I'm skeptical about this. Wouldn't an official IRS document or publication be more authoritative than something generated by a third-party service? I've had bank employees reject even government documents because they "don't match their training." Did the bank actually accept this without pushback?

0 coins

The service basically analyzes your immigration documents and travel history to create a detailed substantial presence test calculation. It shows exactly how many days you've been present in the US across multiple calendar years with a clear explanation of how the test works. Regarding sensitive information, you do need to provide enough details to verify your residency status, but they use bank-level encryption and you can block out parts of documents that aren't relevant to proving your dates of presence. The final report doesn't display your full SSN. The reason banks often accept it is because it presents the information in a clear, professional format specifically designed for financial institutions, rather than generic IRS publications that bank employees may not understand how to interpret. My banker actually thanked me for providing something straightforward they could add to their records.

0 coins

Just wanted to update everyone - I tried taxr.ai after seeing the recommendation here and it worked perfectly! I was really impressed with how thorough the system was. It created a complete analysis of my presence in the US over the past 3 years with specific calculations showing exactly how I qualified under the substantial presence test. When I brought the document to my credit union along with IRS Publication 519, the branch manager actually took copies of both for their records and said this was exactly what they needed to justify accepting my W9. They mentioned they'd had several similar cases and this documentation would help them update their internal procedures. The best part was getting confirmation that I was right all along about which form to use! Worth every penny to avoid the headache of trying to correct tax documentation later.

0 coins

I used to work at a bank and saw this confusion all the time. The real solution I found was using https://claimyr.com to get direct access to an IRS agent who could clarify this. Most people don't realize you can get official verbal confirmation from the IRS to give to your bank! I had a client in your exact situation, and after struggling with our compliance department, we called the IRS together using Claimyr (check out how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c). We bypassed the normal 2+ hour wait times and got an IRS rep on the line in 15 minutes who confirmed that substantial presence test qualifiers should use W9, not W8-BEN. Our compliance department accepted this verbal confirmation, and we made notes in the customer's file. The bank can even call with you if they're being stubborn about it.

0 coins

How does this actually work? Do they somehow get you priority in the IRS phone queue? I've literally never been able to get through to a human at the IRS no matter what time of day I call.

0 coins

This sounds extremely suspicious. There's no way to "skip the line" with a government agency like the IRS. They're notoriously understaffed and overwhelmed. Sounds like you're either making this up or promoting a scam service that will just take people's money for nothing.

0 coins

The service uses a callback system that continually redials and navigates the IRS phone tree until it gets through to a representative. It's not about "skipping the line" - they're just automating the frustrating process of calling, getting disconnected, and calling again that most of us give up on after a few tries. When they reach a human, you get an immediate call connecting you to that IRS representative. It's basically like having someone sit and redial for hours so you don't have to. There's nothing suspicious about it - they're just solving the problem of the IRS being chronically understaffed.

0 coins

I can't believe I'm saying this, but I tried Claimyr after posting my skeptical comment, and it actually worked! After three weeks of getting nowhere with my bank and the IRS phone line constantly hanging up on me, I decided to give it a shot. The service connected me with an IRS representative in about 20 minutes. I explained my situation, and the agent clearly confirmed that as a resident alien under the substantial presence test, I should be using Form W9, not W8-BEN. She even explained that this is a common confusion point for financial institutions. I recorded the call (with permission) and took detailed notes of the agent's ID number and our conversation. When I presented this to my bank along with a printout of the substantial presence test guidelines, they finally accepted my W9. The branch manager actually apologized for the confusion!

0 coins

Not sure if this helps, but I had a similar situation and found a workaround. Some banks are more familiar with these issues than others. I tried a different branch of the same bank and the manager there was much more knowledgeable. He immediately understood the substantial presence test and accepted my W9 without question. If you have the option, try a different branch or a different bank altogether. In my experience, the bigger national banks have better training on these issues than smaller local ones.

0 coins

I'm actually going to try this approach tomorrow! There's another branch about 20 minutes away that's much larger than the one I've been dealing with. Did you bring any specific documentation with you when you went to the other branch? I'm thinking of printing out the relevant sections from IRS Publication 519 just in case.

0 coins

I brought a copy of my previous year's tax return (with sensitive info blacked out) showing I filed Form 1040 as a resident, plus I printed out the substantial presence test page from the IRS website. I also prepared a simple calculation showing how many days I was present in the US for the last three years to demonstrate I clearly passed the test. The visual proof seemed to help a lot since it made it obvious I wasn't just making claims without evidence.

0 coins

Something important to consider - even if you sign the W8-BEN under pressure from the bank, it doesn't actually change your tax status. Your actual status is determined by the substantial presence test, not by what form a bank has on file. The main issue would be that the bank might withhold taxes at the higher nonresident rate on any interest your account earns. But honestly, with current interest rates being so low, we're talking about a tiny amount of money for most checking accounts. If this is your only option to get the account opened, you could sign the W8-BEN temporarily, then once the account is established, go back with your documentation about resident status and ask them to update your information.

0 coins

This is actually not great advice. Signing a form you know contains incorrect information is never recommended, even if it seems like a small issue. The W8-BEN contains a certification under penalties of perjury that the information is correct. Better to keep pushing for the right form or try another bank.

0 coins

I went through this exact same situation last year with Wells Fargo. The key thing that finally worked for me was bringing a letter from a CPA along with my documentation. I had my tax preparer write a brief letter on their letterhead explaining that I qualify as a resident alien under the substantial presence test and should be using Form W9, not W8-BEN. The letter referenced my previous tax filings and included the specific IRS code sections. The bank's compliance officer accepted this professional third-party verification much more readily than when I tried to explain it myself. It cost me about $50 to have the CPA write the letter, but it saved me weeks of back-and-forth with the bank staff. If you have a tax preparer or CPA, this might be worth trying. Banks seem more willing to accept explanations from tax professionals than from customers, even when we're providing the same information.

0 coins

That's a really smart approach! I hadn't thought about getting a CPA involved, but it makes perfect sense that banks would trust a tax professional's explanation over a customer's. $50 seems totally reasonable to avoid all this hassle. Do you think any CPA would be willing to write this kind of letter, or should I specifically look for one who has experience with immigration-related tax issues? I'm wondering if a general tax preparer would be familiar enough with the substantial presence test to write an authoritative letter.

0 coins

I had this exact same problem with Bank of America about 6 months ago! What finally worked for me was escalating to their corporate customer service line rather than dealing with the local branch staff. I called the main customer service number and explained that the branch was requiring me to use the wrong tax form (W8-BEN instead of W9) despite my status as a resident alien under the substantial presence test. The corporate representative was much more knowledgeable about tax compliance requirements and was able to send guidance directly to the branch manager. Within 48 hours, the branch called me back and apologized for the confusion. They had received clarification from their compliance department that resident aliens should indeed use Form W9, regardless of immigration status. I was able to open my account the next day with no issues. Sometimes the front-line staff just aren't trained on these nuances, but the corporate level has access to better resources and expertise. It might be worth trying this route before switching banks or paying for third-party services.

0 coins

This is excellent advice! I wish I had thought to escalate to corporate customer service earlier. It makes total sense that they would have better training on tax compliance issues than branch-level staff. I'm definitely going to try this approach if the other branch location doesn't work out tomorrow. It's frustrating that we have to jump through so many hoops for something that should be straightforward, but at least there are multiple potential solutions here. Thanks for sharing your experience - it gives me hope that this can actually get resolved without having to switch banks entirely!

0 coins

I work in bank compliance and see this issue frequently. The confusion stems from banks conflating immigration status with tax residency status - they're completely different things. Your credit union staff is incorrectly applying immigration-based policies to tax form selection. As a resident alien under the substantial presence test, you absolutely should be using Form W9, not W8-BEN. The W8-BEN form literally states it's for nonresident aliens only. Here's what I'd recommend: bring a copy of IRS Publication 519 highlighting the substantial presence test section, along with your substantial presence calculation showing your days in the US. Also bring a copy of your most recent tax return (with sensitive info redacted) showing you filed as a resident using Form 1040. If they still refuse, ask to speak with their compliance officer or BSA (Bank Secrecy Act) officer - they should have better training on tax form requirements. You can also file a complaint with their primary regulator (NCUA for credit unions) if they continue to insist on incorrect documentation. Don't sign the W8-BEN - it contains a perjury clause certifying the information is correct when you know it's not. Stand your ground on this one.

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful - thank you for the professional perspective! It's reassuring to hear from someone who works in bank compliance that I'm absolutely right about this. I've been second-guessing myself because the bank staff seemed so confident in their position. I really appreciate the specific guidance about asking for the compliance officer or BSA officer. I didn't know those roles existed at credit unions, but it makes sense that they would have specialized training on these requirements. The fact that there's actually a regulatory complaint option (NCUA) gives me confidence that I have recourse if they continue to be unreasonable. I'm definitely not signing that W8-BEN form - the perjury aspect is exactly what's been worrying me the most about this whole situation. I'll try the other branch first with all the documentation you mentioned, and if that doesn't work, I'll escalate to their compliance team. Thanks again for confirming I'm on the right track!

0 coins

As someone who went through a similar ordeal with multiple banks, I can confirm that this is unfortunately a widespread training issue in the banking industry. The key thing to remember is that you're 100% correct - resident aliens under the substantial presence test should absolutely be using Form W9, not W8-BEN. I found success by being very prepared and persistent. Print out the relevant pages from IRS Publication 519, calculate your exact days of presence for the substantial presence test, and bring copies of previous tax returns showing you filed as a resident (Form 1040, not 1040-NR). The most effective approach for me was asking immediately to speak with a manager or compliance officer rather than trying to educate front-line staff. Say something like "I need to speak with someone who handles tax compliance issues because your staff is asking me to sign a form that would be perjury given my actual tax status." If all else fails, try a different bank entirely. Some institutions just have better training on these issues. Credit unions and smaller banks sometimes struggle more with non-standard situations than larger national banks that see more diversity in their customer base. Don't give up - you're right about this, and there are banks out there that will handle it correctly from the start.

0 coins

This is such valuable advice, especially the suggestion to immediately ask for a manager or compliance officer rather than trying to educate front-line staff. I've been making the mistake of trying to explain the substantial presence test to tellers who clearly aren't trained on these nuances. Your point about using language like "perjury" is brilliant - that should get their attention quickly since banks are very sensitive to compliance issues. I'm definitely going to use that approach when I visit the other branch tomorrow. It's frustrating that this is such a widespread training issue, but at least knowing that gives me confidence that the problem is with the bank's procedures, not with my understanding of the tax requirements. I really appreciate you sharing your experience - it helps to know that persistence pays off and there are banks out there that handle this correctly from the start.

0 coins

I'm dealing with this exact same issue right now! My local bank keeps insisting I need a W8-BEN even though I've been filing as a resident alien for the past 3 years. Reading through all these responses is incredibly helpful - I had no idea this was such a widespread problem. The suggestion about asking immediately for a compliance officer really resonates with me. I've been wasting time trying to educate the front desk staff when I should be talking to someone with actual training on tax form requirements. One thing I'm curious about - for those who successfully resolved this, did you find that the bank staff seemed genuinely surprised to learn they were wrong, or did it feel more like they knew but were just following some rigid internal policy? I'm trying to figure out if this is an ignorance issue or a stubbornness issue at my bank. Also, has anyone had experience with this at smaller community banks vs. larger national banks? I'm wondering if I should just cut my losses and go straight to a bigger institution that might have better training protocols.

0 coins

I've encountered both scenarios in my experience! At smaller institutions, it's often genuine surprise - the staff simply haven't dealt with enough resident alien cases to understand the distinction between immigration status and tax residency. They're usually apologetic once they realize their mistake. At larger banks, it sometimes feels more like rigid policy adherence. The front-line staff may have been trained with oversimplified rules like "no green card = W8-BEN" and they're afraid to deviate even when presented with evidence. That's why escalating to compliance officers works better at bigger institutions - they have the authority to override standard procedures. In my experience, mid-size regional banks often strike the best balance. They're large enough to have proper compliance training but small enough that managers can make decisions quickly without layers of bureaucracy. If your community bank keeps being stubborn, I'd definitely try a regional bank before going to a massive national institution where you might get lost in their system. The key is finding someone who understands that tax residency and immigration status are completely separate issues. Once you find that person, the problem usually resolves quickly!

0 coins

This is such a frustrating but unfortunately common issue! I went through something very similar with my credit union last year. What finally worked for me was bringing a complete "resident alien documentation package" to my appointment. Here's what I included: (1) A printed copy of IRS Publication 519 with the substantial presence test section highlighted, (2) A detailed calculation showing my exact days of presence in the US for the past 3 years with supporting documentation like passport stamps or I-94 records, (3) Copies of my previous tax returns showing I filed Form 1040 as a resident alien (with sensitive info redacted), and (4) A simple one-page summary I wrote explaining why the W8-BEN form doesn't apply to my situation. The key was being extremely organized and professional about it. I scheduled a formal appointment with a branch manager rather than just walking in, and I framed it as "I need help ensuring I'm using the correct tax forms to stay compliant with IRS requirements" rather than "your staff is wrong." Most importantly, I emphasized the legal liability aspect - that signing a W8-BEN when I'm actually a resident alien would be making a false statement under penalties of perjury. That got their attention immediately since banks are very risk-averse when it comes to compliance issues. The whole process took about 30 minutes once I sat down with the right person, and they actually thanked me for being so thorough with my documentation. Don't give up - you're absolutely correct about which form to use!

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of systematic approach I needed! I love the idea of creating a complete documentation package and framing it as ensuring compliance rather than pointing out their mistakes. The professional presentation aspect makes so much sense - it probably helps the bank staff save face while still correcting the issue. Your point about emphasizing the perjury aspect is particularly smart. I hadn't thought about how that would immediately shift their focus to risk management rather than just following their standard procedures. Banks definitely don't want to be in a position where they're encouraging customers to make false statements to the IRS. I'm going to follow your template for my documentation package. The one-page summary explaining why W8-BEN doesn't apply is a great idea - it shows I understand both forms rather than just insisting on one over the other. Scheduling a formal appointment instead of just walking in is also brilliant advice. Thank you for sharing such a detailed and successful approach. It gives me a clear roadmap to follow, and I feel much more confident about resolving this now!

0 coins

I'm a tax professional and see this confusion regularly with my clients. The bank staff is absolutely wrong - as a resident alien under the substantial presence test, you should be using Form W9, not W8-BEN. This is a clear-cut case where immigration status and tax residency are being conflated. What I recommend for my clients in this situation is to bring three key documents: (1) IRS Publication 519 with the substantial presence test section highlighted, (2) your substantial presence calculation showing exact days present in the US for the past three years, and (3) a copy of your most recent Form 1040 tax return (with personal details redacted) proving you file as a resident alien. The critical point to emphasize is that signing W8-BEN when you're actually a tax resident would constitute a false statement under penalties of perjury. Banks become very cooperative once you frame it as a compliance risk issue rather than just a paperwork preference. If the front-line staff continues to resist, immediately ask to speak with their compliance officer or BSA officer. These roles exist specifically to handle tax form and regulatory compliance issues, and they should have proper training on the distinction between immigration status and tax residency. Don't compromise on this - you're 100% correct about which form applies to your situation.

0 coins

Thank you for this professional perspective! As someone new to navigating these tax residency issues, it's incredibly reassuring to hear from a tax professional that confirms what I suspected - this really is a clear-cut situation that the bank is handling incorrectly. I really appreciate the specific three-document approach you've outlined. Having a tax professional's recommended "toolkit" gives me confidence that I'm bringing the right materials. The emphasis on framing this as a compliance risk rather than a paperwork preference is particularly insightful - I can see how that would immediately shift the bank's perspective from "customer complaint" to "regulatory issue that needs proper handling." Your point about asking specifically for the compliance officer or BSA officer is invaluable. I didn't even know these roles existed at banks, but it makes perfect sense that they would have specialized training on exactly these kinds of tax form distinctions. One quick question - when you mention the substantial presence calculation, do you recommend showing the actual mathematical formula (days in current year + 1/3 of prior year + 1/6 of year before) or is it sufficient to just show the total qualifying days? I want to make sure I'm presenting this in the most clear and authoritative way possible. Thanks again for taking the time to provide such detailed guidance!

0 coins

For the substantial presence calculation, I recommend showing both the formula and your specific numbers. Create a simple table showing: Year 1 (current): [X days] × 1 = [X], Year 2 (prior): [Y days] × 1/3 = [Y/3], Year 3 (two years ago): [Z days] × 1/6 = [Z/6], then Total = [sum]. This demonstrates you understand exactly how the test works rather than just claiming you qualify. Banks appreciate seeing the actual math because it shows you've done your homework and aren't just guessing about your status. Include the 183-day threshold explanation too - it makes the calculation crystal clear for bank staff who may not be familiar with the formula.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today