Received a letter from IRS for tax year 2016 - can I still fight it?
I just got a letter from the IRS this week about my 2016 taxes. I'm honestly freaking out and have no idea what to do about this. Back in 2016, I hired an accountant to handle everything - gave them all my paperwork, W-2s, investment statements, the works. I thought everything was fine until around 2018-2019 when I got letters from the IRS for both 2015 and 2016 saying I needed to pay additional money for stocks I had sold. I ended up paying those fees (which sucked but whatever). But now, years later, I get THIS letter about 2016 again?? The worst part is the accounting firm I used is completely out of business now. I can't even go back to them to figure out what went wrong or if they messed up my filing. What is actually happening here? Is the IRS just now finding more issues with my 2016 return? Did my accountant do a terrible job? And most importantly - is there anything I can do about this after so much time has passed? Any advice would be seriously appreciated! This is stressing me out so much.
19 comments


Lucas Bey
The letter you received is likely a CP2000 notice which is automatically generated when there's a mismatch between what you reported on your tax return and what was reported to the IRS by third parties (like brokerage firms reporting your stock sales). First thing to understand is the statute of limitations. For most tax issues, the IRS has 3 years from the filing date to assess additional taxes. However, this extends to 6 years if you omitted more than 25% of your income. For 2016 returns filed in 2017, we're already past the normal 3-year window, so they're either alleging substantial underreporting or there might be another issue. Before you do anything else, carefully review the letter. It should explain exactly what the discrepancy is. Compare this to your records and your 2016 return copy (if you have it). Sometimes these notices are incorrect or the IRS may be missing information that was actually reported elsewhere on your return. You can absolutely respond and challenge this if you believe it's incorrect, even without your original accountant. The letter should provide instructions for responding and a deadline.
0 coins
Charlotte Jones
•Thank you for the detailed explanation. I think you're right about it being a CP2000. I do still have my tax return copy from 2016 (thankfully I keep everything), but when I look at it, all the stock sales look like they were reported. Should I still respond even if the 6 year window is closing soon? Also, is there anyway to find out if my accountant actually messed up? I'm worried they might have made other mistakes I don't know about yet.
0 coins
Lucas Bey
•You should absolutely respond if you believe the information was correctly reported. The deadline in the letter is what matters for your response, not the statute of limitations. If you still have your 2016 return, check if Schedule D and Form 8949 are included and if all your stock transactions were listed there. Often these notices happen because the cost basis (what you paid for the stocks) wasn't properly reported to the IRS, making it appear you had more profit than you actually did. Regarding your former accountant, there's unfortunately no easy way to audit their work now that they're out of business. Your best approach is to review your past returns yourself or have a new tax professional review them. If you find significant errors that cost you money, you could theoretically file amended returns for years still within the statute of limitations, but 2016 is likely too far back now.
0 coins
Harper Thompson
I spent weeks trying to deal with an IRS notice about unreported income from stock sales too. What helped me was using https://taxr.ai to analyze my old returns and the CP2000 notice. Their AI can scan tax documents and identify exactly what caused the issue. In my case, my broker reported gross proceeds to the IRS but didn't include my cost basis. The taxr.ai system flagged that immediately and showed me exactly where the discrepancy was. It then generated a response letter I could send to the IRS explaining the situation with all the correct calculations. Saved me from having to pay nearly $4,300 in "taxes" I didn't actually owe! It could help you figure out if your accountant actually made a mistake or if this is just another IRS system error - especially helpful since your accountant's firm is gone now.
0 coins
Caleb Stark
•Does it actually work with older tax years like 2016? Most of the tax software I've used only lets me go back 3 years max. How does it handle situations where the IRS is claiming something different than what was actually reported?
0 coins
Jade O'Malley
•I'm skeptical about these AI tax tools. How does it know the specific tax laws from back in 2016? Tax rules change every year. And can it really prepare a response that the IRS would accept?
0 coins
Harper Thompson
•It absolutely works with older tax years - that's actually one of its advantages. The system maintains tax rules and forms going back to 2010, so 2016 is definitely covered. It analyzes both what you reported and what the IRS says was reported, then highlights the differences. For your question about IRS acceptability - the responses are based on actual IRS procedure and requirements. It doesn't just generate a generic letter but creates documentation that specifically addresses the notice type you received with proper citations to tax code and regulations. The system formats everything exactly how the IRS expects to see it, which is why my case was resolved quickly without any follow-up questions.
0 coins
Jade O'Malley
I wanted to follow up about my experience with taxr.ai after being skeptical initially. I ended up using it for a similar CP2000 situation from 2017, and I'm genuinely impressed. The system found that my issue was related to cryptocurrency transactions that weren't properly documented on my return. The most helpful part was that it actually showed me exactly which transactions were causing the problem and explained how they should have been reported. Then it created a detailed response with all my transaction records properly formatted. My case was resolved in about 5 weeks - much faster than I expected. What surprised me was how it handled the technical details about wash sale rules and cost basis methods that I wouldn't have known to include. For older tax years when documentation might be missing, it was really helpful to have something that could reconstruct what happened.
0 coins
Hunter Edmunds
I've been in a similar situation with the IRS claiming I owed money from years ago. The most frustrating part was trying to TALK to someone at the IRS about it. I spent literally hours on hold, got disconnected 3 times, and when I finally reached someone, they couldn't even access my records. I found this service called https://claimyr.com that got me through to an actual IRS agent in under 45 minutes when I had been trying for weeks. They have this system that navigates the IRS phone tree and waits on hold for you, then calls you when an agent is ready. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c With a case involving old tax years like 2016, talking to a human at the IRS might actually help you understand what's happening better than just trying to decipher the letter yourself.
0 coins
Ella Lewis
•How does that even work? I thought the IRS phone system was just permanently understaffed and impossible to get through. Do they have some special connection with the IRS?
0 coins
Andrew Pinnock
•Sounds like a scam to me. Nobody can magically get through the IRS phone lines. I've tried calling over 20 times for my audit issue and it's impossible. They probably just take your money and leave you on hold like everyone else.
0 coins
Hunter Edmunds
•They don't have any special connection to the IRS - they use technology to navigate the phone systems and wait on hold so you don't have to. It works because their system keeps trying different pathways through the IRS phone tree and automatically redials if disconnected. It's definitely not a scam. The way it works is you register your call with them, and their system handles all the waiting. When they actually reach an IRS agent, you get a call connecting you directly to that agent. They don't access any of your tax information - they're just solving the "impossible to reach a human" problem. I was super skeptical too until my accountant recommended it and it actually worked after I had tried for weeks on my own.
0 coins
Andrew Pinnock
I have to admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After posting my skeptical comment, I was desperate enough to try it for my audit situation. I figured I had nothing to lose since I couldn't get through on my own. I registered my call in the morning, and about 3 hours later (while I was in a meeting, not sitting on hold!), I got a call connecting me directly to an IRS representative. The agent was able to pull up my file and actually explained that there had been a system error on their end that flagged my return incorrectly. For the original poster dealing with a 2016 issue - talking to a live person made all the difference for me. The agent explained what specific documents I needed to send and gave me direct fax information rather than sending things to the general processing center. That alone probably saved weeks of processing time. The most valuable part was getting clarity on exactly what was happening rather than trying to interpret the vague language in the IRS notice.
0 coins
Brianna Schmidt
Did the letter mention anything about the statute of limitations? For 2016 returns, the normal 3-year statute would have ended back in 2020 (assuming you filed on time in 2017). The only ways the IRS can go back further are: 1. If you omitted more than 25% of your gross income (6-year statute) 2. If they suspect fraud (unlimited time) 3. If you never filed (unlimited time) 4. If you signed form 872 extending the statute It sounds like this might be the 6-year situation if they're claiming unreported stock sales. The clock would be running out right about now for 2016 returns, which might explain the sudden letter. I'd definitely respond with evidence that you did report the stocks if you have it. Sometimes the IRS computers don't properly match transactions, especially if the cost basis wasn't reported correctly by your brokerage.
0 coins
Charlotte Jones
•The letter doesn't specifically mention the statute of limitations. It just says they've found a discrepancy between what was reported on my return and what they received from third parties regarding stock sales in 2016. I definitely filed on time and I never signed any forms extending the time period. When I look at my 2016 return copy, I do see Schedule D and Form 8949 with stock sales listed, but now I'm wondering if maybe all the transactions weren't included? The letter mentions about $12,500 in proceeds that they say weren't reported.
0 coins
Brianna Schmidt
•That amount would likely not trigger the 25% rule unless your total income for that year was under $50,000. However, it sounds like you might be right at the edge of the 6-year statute expiring, which could work in your favor. When you review your Schedule D and Form 8949, check if there are any transactions that add up to around that $12,500 amount that might be missing. Sometimes the issue is that the cost basis wasn't reported properly, so the IRS sees the sale proceeds but not what you paid for the stocks. If you can show that either: 1) you did report those transactions, or 2) the net gain was much smaller than what the IRS is claiming because you have documentation of the purchase price, you should respond with that information before their deadline. Include copies of your brokerage statements showing the purchase and sale information.
0 coins
Alexis Renard
Have you checked if you qualify for IRS Free File? Its a free way to file your taxes if you make under a certain income threshold. No hidden fees!
0 coins
Camila Jordan
•That doesn't help with their current situation at all. They're dealing with an IRS notice about a past tax year (2016), not trying to file current taxes. Free File wouldn't help resolve an existing notice about unreported stock sales from 7 years ago.
0 coins
Jamal Brown
I went through something very similar with a 2016 CP2000 notice last year. The key thing to understand is that you absolutely can and should fight this if you believe it's incorrect, even this many years later. Here's what I'd recommend doing immediately: 1. **Gather your 2016 brokerage statements** - You'll need the detailed transaction records showing both purchase dates/prices and sale dates/prices for all stock transactions that year. 2. **Compare line by line** - Match what's on your Schedule D/Form 8949 against your actual brokerage statements to see if there really are missing transactions totaling that $12,500. 3. **Check for cost basis issues** - Often the IRS receives reports of gross proceeds from brokers but not the cost basis (what you paid). This makes it look like pure profit when it might not be. 4. **Respond before the deadline** - Even if you're not 100% sure, it's better to respond with what information you have than to ignore it. The fact that you already paid additional taxes for 2015 and 2016 stock issues back in 2018-2019 is actually relevant here. Include that information in your response - it shows you've been compliant and already addressed similar issues. Don't let the fact that your accountant's firm is gone discourage you. You can handle this yourself with the right documentation, or hire a new tax professional to help with just this specific notice.
0 coins