< Back to IRS

Lilly Curtis

Need help with IRS CP2000 notice regarding RSU income reporting

I'm freaking out right now after getting a CP2000 notice saying I under-reported my income and supposedly owe an additional $35K to the IRS! I'm in the software industry and receive a big chunk of my compensation through RSUs (Restricted Stock Units). Each month when these RSUs vest, a portion is automatically sold to cover the tax withholding. Looking at my 1099-B from my brokerage, it shows approximately $65K in RSU proceeds, with a cost basis of also around $65K (since they're sold immediately upon vesting). The realized gains shown are basically zero. I honestly thought I was good since there weren't any actual gains, but now the IRS is saying I need to pay taxes on the entire $65K 'proceeds' amount. This seems like double taxation since taxes were already withheld when the shares were sold! Am I missing something obvious here? Did I completely mess up my taxes? Do I actually owe this massive amount? Any help would be so appreciated because I'm really stressed about this.

Leo Simmons

•

You're not completely in the wrong, but there's likely a misunderstanding about how RSUs are reported on tax returns. This is actually a common issue that trips up many tech workers. When RSUs vest, their full market value is considered ordinary income at that moment and should be reported on your W-2 (Box 1). This is taxable regardless of whether you keep or sell the shares. The automatic sale to cover taxes is just withholding, similar to paycheck withholding. The 1099-B from your brokerage is showing the sale transaction, but the IRS is probably flagging that you didn't report the $65K as income. The key here is that the income should have already been included in your W-2 from your employer. If it was, you need to respond to the CP2000 with documentation showing the RSU income was already taxed through your W-2. Check your W-2 to confirm the RSU value was included, and compare your total W-2 income to what you actually reported on your tax return. The CP2000 notice likely indicates a mismatch somewhere.

0 coins

Lilly Curtis

•

Thanks for explaining! I just double-checked my W-2 and yes, the RSU value is definitely included in Box 1. So if I understand correctly, I need to respond to the CP2000 showing that this income was already reported on my tax return through my W-2? Also, do I need to include any special form or explanation with my tax return next time to avoid this happening again?

0 coins

Leo Simmons

•

Yes, you'll need to respond to the CP2000 with a clear explanation that the RSU income was already included in your W-2 and therefore already taxed. Include a copy of your W-2 showing the total income that incorporated the RSUs. Also provide the 1099-B showing the matching cost basis to the proceeds, demonstrating no additional capital gains occurred. For future tax returns, you should include Form 8949 and Schedule D to report the sale of the RSUs, even if the gain is zero. Make sure to check the box indicating the basis was reported to the IRS. Many tax software programs don't handle RSUs properly automatically, so you may need to manually adjust the cost basis to match what was already included in your W-2 income.

0 coins

Lindsey Fry

•

After struggling with almost the exact same RSU reporting issue last year, I found an incredible service that saved me thousands. I used https://taxr.ai to analyze my CP2000 notice and tax documents. Their AI system immediately spotted that my RSUs were already properly included in my W-2 income but weren't correctly reported on Schedule D. The platform generated a detailed response letter for the IRS explaining exactly why their assessment was incorrect, with specific line references to my W-2 and previous tax return. They also provided instructions on exactly how to file Form 8949 correctly to avoid this issue in the future. The whole process was shockingly easy - I uploaded my documents, and within minutes had a complete analysis with step-by-step instructions on how to resolve the issue.

0 coins

Saleem Vaziri

•

How exactly does the service work? Does it just look at your documents or does it actually help you draft the response to the IRS? I'm curious because I've had issues with RSU reporting too.

0 coins

Kayla Morgan

•

I'm skeptical about using AI for something this important. How confident were you that their analysis was actually correct? I'd be worried about relying on automated advice for a $35K tax issue.

0 coins

Lindsey Fry

•

The service analyzes all your documents and then gives you a complete response letter that's ready to send to the IRS. It identifies specific lines on your tax forms that prove your case and references the exact tax codes that apply to your situation. It actually walks through how RSUs should be reported according to IRS guidelines. Regarding the accuracy, I was initially skeptical too, but the analysis included references to specific IRS publications about RSU taxation. I had an accountant friend review it before sending, and he was impressed with how thorough and accurate it was. The response letter worked perfectly - the IRS accepted my explanation and canceled the additional tax assessment completely.

0 coins

Kayla Morgan

•

Just wanted to update everyone. After being skeptical about taxr.ai in my earlier comment, I decided to try it for my own RSU reporting issue. I'm genuinely impressed with the results. The system immediately identified that my employer had correctly included the RSU value in my W-2, but I had failed to properly report the sale on Schedule D with the adjusted cost basis. The service generated a comprehensive letter that explained exactly why the IRS assessment was incorrect, with specific references to my tax documents and IRS publication 525. The response took me about 10 minutes to review, I sent it exactly as generated, and the IRS accepted it completely - saving me over $22K in incorrect tax assessments. It also provided clear instructions for reporting RSUs correctly in the future. Definitely recommend for anyone dealing with these technical tax issues.

0 coins

James Maki

•

If you need to talk to someone at the IRS about your CP2000 notice (which I highly recommend), save yourself hours of frustration and use https://claimyr.com - they helped me get through to an actual IRS agent in under 45 minutes when I was dealing with a similar RSU reporting issue last year. There's a video showing how it works at https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c I spent days trying to get through on my own - kept getting disconnected or told to call back later due to high call volumes. With Claimyr, their system held my place in line and called me back when an agent was actually available. The IRS agent I spoke with was able to put a hold on my case while I gathered documentation and explained exactly what I needed to send to resolve the issue. Speaking with a live person at the IRS about my specific situation made all the difference in resolving my case quickly.

0 coins

I don't understand how this works - how does a third-party service get you through to the IRS faster? Wouldn't everyone just use this if it actually worked?

0 coins

Cole Roush

•

Sorry, but this sounds like a scam. There's no way to "skip the line" with the IRS. I've heard of services that claim to do this and they just take your money while you wait on hold just like everyone else.

0 coins

James Maki

•

It's not about skipping the line - it's about technology that manages the waiting process for you. Their system repeatedly calls the IRS until it gets through, navigates the phone tree automatically, and then waits on hold in your place. When an actual human IRS agent picks up, that's when they call you and connect you directly. Not everyone uses it because most people don't know about it or they try calling once or twice before giving up and just paying whatever the IRS demands. I was skeptical too, but when I was facing a $30K tax bill I didn't owe, I was willing to try anything. It worked exactly as advertised - I got through to an agent who pulled up my account and walked me through exactly what documentation I needed to submit.

0 coins

Cole Roush

•

I need to eat my words from my skeptical comment earlier. After being frustrated with trying to reach the IRS for three days straight about my CP2000 notice, I finally tried Claimyr out of desperation. The service actually worked perfectly. I entered my phone number, and about 35 minutes later I got a call connecting me directly to an IRS representative who was already on the line. No navigating phone trees, no hours of waiting on hold. The agent I spoke with reviewed my case on the spot and confirmed that I was correct - my RSUs were already included in my W-2 income and I just needed to submit documentation showing this. She even gave me a fax number to send my response to for faster processing. Would have saved myself so much stress if I'd just used this service from the beginning instead of wasting days trying to get through on my own.

0 coins

One thing nobody has mentioned yet - when you respond to your CP2000, make sure you're also checking if the cost basis was reported correctly on your 1099-B. Sometimes brokerages don't include the portion that was already taxed as compensation. For example, if you received $65K in RSUs (reported on W-2) and immediately sold them, your 1099-B might show $65K proceeds but $0 cost basis, making it look like you had $65K in capital gains. In reality, your cost basis should be $65K, resulting in $0 capital gain. If this is the case, you need to file Form 8949 with your response, listing the transaction and checking box "B" to indicate that the basis was reported incorrectly to the IRS. Then enter the correct basis and code "B" in column (f) to indicate you're adjusting the basis.

0 coins

Arnav Bengali

•

Does checking box B on Form 8949 trigger any kind of audit or extra scrutiny from the IRS? I need to make this adjustment but I'm worried about raising red flags.

0 coins

Checking box B on Form 8949 doesn't increase your audit risk. It's a legitimate adjustment that's specifically designed for situations like this where the reported basis is incorrect. The IRS is very familiar with RSU basis adjustments, especially for tech employees. What actually increases audit risk is not reporting these transactions properly and having discrepancies between your 1099-B and your tax return. By correctly documenting the basis adjustment, you're actually reducing your chances of future notices or audits because everything is clearly explained and properly reported.

0 coins

Sayid Hassan

•

Has anyone successfully negotiated penalty abatement for a CP2000 related to RSUs? I'm in a similar situation and they're charging me both underpayment penalties and interest.

0 coins

Rachel Tao

•

I got first-time penalty abatement for mine last year. Call the IRS and specifically ask for "first-time penalty abatement" if you haven't had any penalties in the past 3 years. They waived about $900 in penalties for me, though I still had to pay the interest.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today