Need help understanding IRC Section 338(h)(10) election for post-acquisition accounting
So I've been thrown into the deep end with this IRC Section 338(h)(10) situation and I'm pretty lost. I'm working with the seller after they've completed a sale, and I'm struggling with how to properly handle the stepped-up basis at FMV for the assets. From what I understand, Section 338(h)(10) treats the stock sale as an asset sale for tax purposes, giving the buyer that stepped-up basis. But I'm stuck on the accounting mechanics. I think I need to: 1) Remove the accumulated depreciation and amortization through retained earnings? (Not sure if this is right) 2) Adjust the value of the assets to FMV through additional paid-in capital? (Also not confident) Has anyone dealt with this specific tax code section before? The transaction closed last month, and I'm trying to get everything properly recorded before we wrap up the books. Any insights or experiences would be super helpful right now.
19 comments

Astrid Bergström
I've worked with several 338(h)(10) elections during my career. Let me clarify a few things that might help you out. For the seller's side accounting after a 338(h)(10) election, you're essentially recording a deemed asset sale rather than a stock sale. Your approach needs some adjustment though. Here's what typically happens: For the seller (since you mentioned that's who you're representing): You'll need to record the deemed asset sale by removing the book value of assets and recognizing gain/loss based on the difference between FMV and book value. This doesn't flow through additional paid-in capital - it's an income statement event. The removal of accumulated depreciation is part of removing the book value of the assets, but this flows through the income statement as part of calculating gain/loss, not directly to retained earnings. Remember that the 338(h)(10) election creates a deemed liquidation of the target into the selling consolidated group. The tax consequences can be complex depending on your specific situation.
0 coins
Ravi Patel
AuthorThanks for the response! So if I understand correctly, I'm overthinking this. It's basically just recording the sale of assets at FMV, removing the book value (including accumulated depreciation), and recognizing gain/loss through the income statement - not through equity accounts? Does this mean I should be recording journal entries that debit cash (for proceeds), credit the various asset accounts (to remove them), debit accumulated depreciation (to remove it), and then either debit or credit a gain/loss account for the difference?
0 coins
Astrid Bergström
That's exactly right. You're recording a sale transaction, not an equity transaction. The journal entries would be as you described: debit cash (or whatever consideration was received), credit the asset accounts, debit accumulated depreciation, and either debit or credit a gain/loss account for the difference. The tricky part is that under 338(h)(10), this is all deemed to happen even though physically you sold stock. The tax treatment follows the deemed asset sale treatment, which is why this election is often made - it gives the buyer a stepped-up basis while often not creating significantly more tax burden for the seller compared to a regular stock sale. Remember that there could be different gain/loss recognition for different asset classes, and you might need to allocate the purchase price among the various assets according to the purchase agreement and Section 1060 rules.
0 coins
PixelPrincess
After reading this thread, I wanted to share my experience with taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) when I was dealing with a similar IRC Section 338(h)(10) issue last year. My company went through an acquisition with this election, and the accounting treatment had me totally confused. I uploaded our transaction documents to taxr.ai, and their system actually spotted some details in the purchase agreement that affected the tax treatment that our regular accountant missed. The thing that helped most was their analysis of how to properly allocate the purchase price across different asset classes according to Section 1060 - which is crucial for a proper 338(h)(10) treatment. They provided a detailed walkthrough of the exact journal entries needed, which saved me from making some serious mistakes with the gain recognition. It was seriously helpful for this niche tax area.
0 coins
Omar Farouk
How does taxr.ai handle the confidentiality of sensitive acquisition documents? I'm dealing with a similar situation but very concerned about uploading our purchase agreement and financial statements to a third-party service.
0 coins
Chloe Martin
Did you find it actually understood the mechanics of the deemed liquidation part of 338(h)(10)? That's where I'm currently stuck - our tax advisors and accountants are giving me conflicting information about how to record the deemed distribution of assets.
0 coins
PixelPrincess
They use bank-level encryption and their privacy policy states they don't use your documents for anything other than providing you the analysis. I was initially concerned about that too, but their system allows you to redact sensitive information before uploading while keeping the relevant tax parts visible. Regarding the deemed liquidation mechanics, yes - that was actually the most helpful part. They explained the entire sequence including the deemed distribution of assets and the timing of recognition events. It provided a clear step-by-step approach that reconciled what my tax advisors were saying with what our accountants were suggesting. The analysis showed exactly where the misunderstanding was happening between the two groups.
0 coins
Chloe Martin
I wanted to follow up about my experience with taxr.ai. After asking about it in my reply above, I decided to give it a try with our 338(h)(10) election documentation. I'm honestly amazed at how well it worked for our situation. We had been stuck for weeks because our CPA firm was treating it as a regular stock sale with some tax adjustments, while our in-house team knew we needed to account for the deemed asset sale aspects. The taxr.ai analysis broke down exactly how to handle the deemed liquidation events in order. The most valuable part was the explanation of how to allocate the consideration across our different asset classes according to the residual method, along with the specific journal entries showing the impact on our deferred tax accounts. Saved us from what would have been a major reporting error. If you're struggling with complex tax code sections like 338(h)(10), it's definitely worth checking out.
0 coins
Diego Fernández
For those struggling with the IRS guidance on 338(h)(10) elections, I found that calling the IRS directly was the best way to get clarity. Of course, that's easier said than done - I spent DAYS trying to get through to someone knowledgeable about corporate transactions. Finally tried Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) after seeing it mentioned in another tax forum. Their service actually got me connected to an IRS agent specializing in corporate transactions within about 30 minutes, which was shocking after my previous attempts. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent walked me through the entire 338(h)(10) process and confirmed the proper treatment for our specific situation. Having that direct guidance from the source gave us the confidence to proceed with our accounting treatment.
0 coins
Anastasia Kuznetsov
Wait, so this service somehow gets you past the IRS phone queue? How does that even work? I've literally tried calling the IRS business line about 20 times over the past month about an unrelated issue and can't get through.
0 coins
Sean Fitzgerald
This sounds too good to be true. The IRS is notoriously difficult to reach by phone. And even if you get through, what are the chances you'll reach someone who actually understands something as complex as Section 338(h)(10) elections? Most agents I've spoken with for basic questions barely understand standard deductions.
0 coins
Diego Fernández
It uses an automated calling system that navigates the IRS phone tree and holds your place in line. When it finally reaches an agent, it calls you to connect. It's basically just solving the hold time problem - instead of you waiting on hold for hours, their system does it for you. You're right that not every IRS agent will understand complex corporate transactions. When I got connected, I specifically asked if the agent had experience with corporate reorganizations and Section 338 elections. The first person transferred me to someone in their business tax department who was knowledgeable. There's definitely some luck involved with who you get, but at least you're not wasting hours just trying to reach anyone.
0 coins
Sean Fitzgerald
I need to follow up on my skeptical comment above about Claimyr. I ended up trying it for our 338(h)(10) question because we were desperate for IRS guidance on a specific aspect of our transaction. I'm actually shocked to report it worked exactly as described. After the service got me through to an IRS representative, I was able to get transferred to the Business & Specialty Tax Line where I spoke with someone who clearly understood these elections. They confirmed our understanding of the deemed asset sale treatment and provided specific guidance on reporting requirements for Form 8883. The most valuable outcome was getting clarification on the treatment of contingent consideration in our transaction, which none of our advisors had been able to give us a definitive answer on. Saved us a ton of uncertainty and potentially costly mistakes.
0 coins
Zara Khan
One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is the Form 8883 that needs to be filed with both the seller's and buyer's tax returns. This form allocates the consideration among the asset classes, and both parties need to use consistent allocation. In my experience, the trickiest part of a 338(h)(10) election is getting agreement between buyer and seller on the allocation of purchase price. The buyer typically wants to allocate more to assets with faster depreciation/amortization schedules (like equipment or intangibles), while the seller often prefers allocation to assets with favorable capital gains treatment. Has your purchase agreement specified the allocation, or is that still being negotiated?
0 coins
Ravi Patel
AuthorThe purchase agreement has a preliminary allocation, but it's subject to adjustment based on the final closing balance sheet. I didn't realize both parties needed to file Form 8883 with consistent allocations - that's really helpful to know. Since you've dealt with this before, any tips on how to handle allocation disputes if they come up? The buyer is pushing for more allocation to equipment and certain intangibles as you mentioned.
0 coins
Zara Khan
Allocation disputes are common with 338(h)(10) transactions. The best approach is to reference the purchase agreement's dispute resolution mechanism. Most well-drafted agreements will include a process for resolving allocation disagreements. If your agreement doesn't specify a process, I recommend getting both tax teams together early to work through it. You can often reach compromise by quantifying the tax benefit/detriment to each side and finding middle ground. Sometimes it helps to bring in an independent valuation specialist to provide objective analysis. Remember that the IRS can challenge allocations that don't reflect FMV, so having support for your positions is important regardless of what's negotiated. Documentation of how you arrived at the values is crucial in case of audit.
0 coins
MoonlightSonata
Has anyone used Crypto Software for handling the accounting side of 338(h)(10) elections? Our company just implemented it and I'm trying to determine if it's worth setting up a specialized template for this transaction type.
0 coins
Mateo Gonzalez
I haven't used Crypto specifically, but we used CCH Axcess for our last 338(h)(10) transaction. It had a decent workflow for handling the deemed asset sale and guiding through the Form 8883 preparation. The key was setting up the right asset classes at the beginning. One tip regardless of software - create a separate tracking spreadsheet for the transaction that shows both book and tax basis by asset. This helps tremendously with the future tax return preparation and tracking basis differences going forward.
0 coins
Jamal Thompson
This is a really helpful thread! I'm dealing with a similar 338(h)(10) election situation and wanted to add one consideration that hasn't been mentioned yet - the timing of when you recognize the deemed asset sale. The election creates a deemed sale at the close of the acquisition date, so make sure you're not accidentally spreading the gain/loss recognition over multiple periods. Everything should hit your books as of the closing date, even if you're doing the accounting work weeks later like Ravi mentioned. Also, don't forget about any depreciation recapture implications. If you have assets with accumulated depreciation (like equipment or buildings), part of your gain might be subject to depreciation recapture at ordinary income rates rather than capital gains rates. This can significantly impact the tax consequences and should factor into your journal entries. One more thing - if your transaction involved any installment consideration or earnouts, the accounting gets even more complex under 338(h)(10). You'll need to determine the fair value of those contingent payments as part of the deemed sale price. Has anyone dealt with earnout provisions in these elections?
0 coins