NSOs and SecFi tax implications - unexpected tax bill after option purchase
I'm currently dealing with a massive tax headache from using SecFi to buy my NSOs and hoping someone can offer advice. I've already talked to other tech friends, my accountant, and former coworkers, but I'm still confused and struggling. Here's what happened: In 2022, I used SecFi to finance purchasing my NSOs from the startup I had left. The options were priced at $6.75/share, and supposedly the taxes ($115k) were included in the wire transfer SecFi sent to my former company. When I specifically asked SecFi about tax implications, they told me that since these were NSOs, the taxes were already covered in the transaction to my previous employer. SecFi also provided additional funding expecting my previous company's IPO, which did happen. After they took their cut, I got some money back that's now all going toward this unexpected 2022 tax bill. My issue is that my former employer used a Fair Market Value (FMV) of $67/share (minus the $6.75/share I paid) and reported this as wages on a 2022 W-2. I moved in 2023 and never received this W-2. Based on what SecFi told me about taxes being "handled," I wasn't expecting one anyway. Last month, I got a letter from the IRS saying I omitted over $270k in wages from my 2022 tax return. After discussing with my accountant, I now owe an additional $31k in taxes for 2022! So I used SecFi to purchase NSO options from my former employer and am nearly net negative because I'm being taxed on both the option price AND the Fair Market Value. Has anyone else been through this? Is this normal? I understand SecFi will claim they can't provide tax advice, but it feels deceptive that they didn't make it clear NSOs are taxed on both option value and FMV, and that I should have expected a W-2. My current accountant isn't familiar with these situations, so any advice or recommendations would be super helpful! I'm looking for a new accountant too, but need to respond to the IRS soon. Thanks!
23 comments


Luis Johnson
This is unfortunately a common misunderstanding with NSOs. When you exercise NSOs, the spread between what you paid ($6.75/share) and the Fair Market Value ($67/share) is considered compensation income and is subject to income tax. Your former employer correctly reported this as wages on a W-2. The "taxes paid" as part of the SecFi transaction were likely just the withholding required at the time of exercise, but this often doesn't cover your full tax liability, especially if you're in a high tax bracket or have other income sources. The withholding is typically only at a flat 22% federal rate for supplemental wages, while your actual tax rate could be higher. You should gather all documentation from both SecFi and your former employer showing exactly what was paid and withheld. The W-2 should show the income and any federal/state taxes that were withheld. If taxes were withheld but not credited to your return (because you didn't include the W-2), you may be able to get some of that $31k back. Going forward, whenever you exercise NSOs, always expect to receive a W-2 from the company, even if you're no longer employed there. The tax treatment of NSOs is very different from ISOs or RSUs, and it sounds like that wasn't clearly communicated to you.
0 coins
Jasmine Hernandez
•Thanks for the explanation! When you say the "taxes paid" were likely just withholding, that makes sense. But the confusing part is that SecFi specifically told me the taxes were covered in full. Should I have received some documentation about the withholding percentage they used? Also, do you know if there's any recourse with SecFi since they gave me incorrect information about the tax implications? I literally asked them directly and they assured me everything was handled.
0 coins
Luis Johnson
•The withholding information should appear on the W-2 your former employer issued. It will show exactly how much was withheld for federal and state taxes. If you don't have the W-2, request a duplicate from your former employer immediately or get a wage and income transcript from the IRS. Regarding recourse with SecFi, it's tricky because financial platforms typically have disclaimers stating they don't provide tax advice, even if individual representatives give informal guidance. Check your service agreement - there's likely language absolving them of tax liability. However, if you have written communication where they explicitly stated all tax obligations were fully covered (not just withholding), you might have a case to push back. I'd recommend consulting with a tax attorney who specializes in equity compensation before proceeding with any claims against them.
0 coins
Ellie Kim
After facing similar equity tax nightmares, I stumbled across taxr.ai which completely changed how I handle these situations. Their system specifically analyzes equity documents, SecFi agreements, and can even review past tax filings to identify where the miscommunication happened. I used them when I had issues with my NSO exercise last year and found out my company had actually misreported my exercise cost basis. The taxr.ai system spotted the discrepancy immediately in my paperwork when my accountant missed it completely. You upload your SecFi documents, W-2s, and any communications about the taxes being "covered" to https://taxr.ai and their AI analyzes everything to explain exactly what happened. The best part was they showed me what specific questions to ask both SecFi and my former employer to resolve the situation. I ended up saving nearly $20k because they found withholding that actually HAD been paid but wasn't properly credited.
0 coins
Fiona Sand
•I'm in a similar situation with Carta stock options and confused about the tax implications. Does taxr.ai help explain what I should expect BEFORE I exercise options? I'm nervous about ending up with a huge surprise tax bill like the OP.
0 coins
Mohammad Khaled
•This sounds too good to be true. How exactly does their AI know tax law better than a human accountant who specializes in this? I've worked with equity comp specialists who charge $500/hr and still miss things. What makes this service different from just going to a top-tier accountant?
0 coins
Ellie Kim
•They absolutely can help before you exercise options. You can upload your option grant agreements and they'll give you a full breakdown of the tax implications under different exercise scenarios. They'll show you exactly what taxes to expect at exercise time and when you eventually sell the shares. What makes them different from human accountants is they've trained their system on thousands of equity documents and tax cases specifically related to startup equity. Most accountants, even good ones, only see a handful of these cases each year. Their system can spot patterns and compare your documents to similar cases they've analyzed before. They're not replacing accountants - they're giving you information to work more effectively with them. Many users actually share the taxr.ai analysis with their accountants to help them understand the specifics of equity transactions.
0 coins
Fiona Sand
I just wanted to follow up and say I tried taxr.ai after seeing it mentioned here. I was skeptical at first but decided to give it a shot with my Carta options situation. The analysis was incredibly detailed and helped me understand exactly what would happen tax-wise under different exercise scenarios. I uploaded my option grant documents, some emails with our HR about the equity, and my previous year's tax return. Within about an hour, I got back a complete breakdown showing what my tax liability would be if I exercised now versus waiting until later, including AMT implications I hadn't even considered. What surprised me most was discovering that my company's 409A valuation had some unusual vesting acceleration provisions that would have created a much higher tax liability than I was expecting! Going to use this info when talking to my accountant next week, but already feeling way more prepared. Definitely recommend if you're dealing with stock options.
0 coins
Alina Rosenthal
I had almost the exact same situation with SecFi and NSOs back in 2021. Spent MONTHS trying to get someone at the IRS to understand my situation. I kept calling the general number and getting nowhere - just endless holds and transfers until I'd eventually get disconnected. After the fifth failed attempt, I found Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). They have this system where they actually wait on hold with the IRS for you and then call you once they have an agent on the line. I was super skeptical but watched their demo video (https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c) and decided to try it. They got me through to an IRS specialist who actually understood equity compensation within a few hours. The agent helped me figure out that part of the taxes HAD been withheld by my former employer but weren't properly applied to my account. Managed to reduce my bill by almost half! Would have never gotten this resolved without getting to the right person at the IRS.
0 coins
Finnegan Gunn
•How does this actually work? Do they just sit on hold for you and then call you? Seems like something I could just do myself with two phones or something.
0 coins
Miguel Harvey
•Yeah right. The IRS barely answers their own phones, let alone would work with some third-party service. This sounds like a scam to get desperate people to hand over personal info. Has anyone verified this is even legitimate?
0 coins
Alina Rosenthal
•It's much more practical than using two phones. They have technology that keeps your place in line and notifies you when an agent picks up. I tried the multiple phone approach before and still wasted hours because I couldn't focus on anything else while waiting. This is definitely legitimate. The service doesn't access your personal tax information - they simply establish the phone connection with the IRS and then bridge you in when a human answers. You're the one who speaks directly with the IRS agent, providing all your information yourself. I was skeptical too, but they're actually mentioned in several news articles about tax season solutions. They don't claim to have any special relationship with the IRS - they've just built technology to solve the hold time problem.
0 coins
Miguel Harvey
I have to eat my words and share a follow-up about Claimyr. After expressing skepticism, I decided to try it anyway because I've been trying to reach the IRS about my own equity compensation issue for THREE WEEKS without success. Used Claimyr yesterday afternoon, and I'm still shocked at how well it worked. They got me connected to an IRS agent in about 2.5 hours (which is lightning fast compared to my previous attempts). The connection was clear, and I was able to get my questions about NSO reporting requirements answered by a knowledgeable agent. My situation was similar to the original poster - had equity from a former employer where the taxes weren't properly accounted for. The IRS agent confirmed I needed to file an amended return but also explained exactly how to document the withholding that had already occurred so I wouldn't be double-taxed. I was definitely wrong about this being some kind of scam. The service did exactly what it promised without ever having access to my personal information.
0 coins
Ashley Simian
Something important that nobody has mentioned yet - check if there was state tax withholding too. When I went through this with NSOs, my company withheld federal tax but completely missed state tax withholding, which was a huge hit in California. Also, did you actually confirm the exact amount that SecFi sent to your former employer? There should be a detailed transaction statement showing exactly what portion was for the options purchase price, what was for federal withholding, what was for state withholding, and what was for any other fees. In my experience, the "taxes covered" language from these financing companies usually just means they included the mandatory withholding amount in the financing, not that they handled your full tax liability. The mandatory withholding is often way less than what you actually owe.
0 coins
Jasmine Hernandez
•That's an excellent point about state taxes! I'm in New York, so the state tax hit would be significant. I requested the transaction statement from SecFi, but they've been slow to respond. Do you know if there's a standard withholding percentage for equity transactions like this? Also, did you have any luck negotiating with the IRS on penalties? I'm worried about the late payment penalties on top of everything else.
0 coins
Ashley Simian
•For supplemental wages (which is how NSO exercises are classified), federal withholding is typically 22% (or 37% for amounts over $1 million). State withholding varies greatly - New York is around 9-10% depending on your income level, but companies sometimes apply a flat rate. Regarding IRS penalties, you absolutely can request abatement, especially for a first-time issue. File Form 843 and explain that you relied on information from SecFi that the taxes were "covered" and that you didn't receive the W-2 due to your move. Include any documentation of SecFi's statements about taxes being handled. The IRS has a "first-time abatement" policy that often waives penalties for taxpayers with good prior compliance history. If you've filed and paid on time for the past 3 years, emphasize this in your request.
0 coins
Oliver Cheng
Has anyone used a specific tax professional who specializes in startup equity? My regular CPA is completely lost with my RSUs and NSOs.
0 coins
Taylor To
•I work with Daniel Johnson at Equity Tax Partners in San Francisco. He exclusively handles tech equity compensation issues. Not cheap ($450/hr) but worth it when you're dealing with six-figure tax implications. He saved me from a massive ISO/AMT mistake last year.
0 coins
Ella Cofer
Important question: when did you leave your company compared to when you exercised the options? If there was a significant gap (like more than 3 months), there might be an issue with the 409A valuation they used for the FMV. Companies are supposed to use updated valuations, and if they used an outdated one, you might have grounds to dispute the valuation with the IRS.
0 coins
Jasmine Hernandez
•I left in May 2022 and exercised in November 2022, so about a 6-month gap. The company went public in early 2023, so the $67 FMV they used was probably based on the pre-IPO valuation round. Is there any way to challenge this retroactively? The company is now trading at about $45/share, which is actually lower than the FMV they used for tax purposes.
0 coins
Ella Cofer
•That 6-month gap is significant! Companies are typically expected to update their 409A valuations at least every 12 months or after major events (funding rounds, significant business changes). Since they went public shortly after, there was likely a pre-IPO valuation round that increased the 409A significantly. You might have grounds to challenge the valuation, especially since the current trading price is lower than the FMV used. This is complex territory though - you'll need a tax attorney with securities experience. They can help you file a formal dispute with both the IRS and your former employer. Document everything: the exercise date, your termination date, the 409A valuation they used, when that valuation was performed, and the post-IPO trading history. The fact that the stock is trading below the valuation used for your tax basis is meaningful evidence that the valuation might have been inflated.
0 coins
Isabella Russo
This is a really complex situation that highlights why equity compensation taxation is so tricky. Based on what you've described, it sounds like there were multiple communication failures between SecFi, your former employer, and potentially even your accountant. One thing that stands out is that you mentioned SecFi told you taxes were "covered" but then your former employer reported wages on a W-2. This suggests there might have been withholding taxes paid (which SecFi may have included in their financing) but the W-2 income wasn't properly accounted for on your tax return. A few immediate steps I'd recommend: 1. Get a wage and income transcript from the IRS for 2022 - this will show exactly what was reported and any withholding credits you might be entitled to 2. Request detailed documentation from SecFi showing exactly what taxes were withheld and paid on your behalf 3. File an amended return (Form 1040X) to properly report the W-2 income, which should also credit any withholding that was already paid The good news is that if taxes were actually withheld but not credited to your account, you might not owe as much as you think. The bad news is that NSO exercises almost always result in a significant tax liability that goes beyond just withholding. Going forward, always assume you'll get a W-2 for NSO exercises and that additional taxes beyond withholding will be owed. These financing companies are in the business of providing capital, not tax advice, regardless of what their reps might say informally.
0 coins
Freya Nielsen
•This is exactly the kind of comprehensive breakdown I needed to see! The wage and income transcript suggestion is brilliant - I had no idea that existed. I've been trying to piece together what actually happened with the withholding, but getting that official IRS record should show me exactly what was reported and credited to my account. I'm definitely going to request that detailed documentation from SecFi. They've been giving me the runaround when I ask for specifics about what taxes were actually paid versus just "handled." Your point about them being in the capital business, not tax advice, really hits home. I should have been more skeptical when they made those assurances. One quick question - do you know roughly how long it takes to get the wage and income transcript from the IRS? I need to respond to their letter soon and want to make sure I have all the facts before I file that amended return.
0 coins