Is the proposed IRS budget cut a disaster waiting to happen?
I just read about this new bill that would slash IRS funding to increase aid to Israel, and as someone who works with taxes regularly, I'm seriously concerned. We've barely got a functional tax administration system as it is. The people cheering for IRS cuts have clearly never had to deal with them on a professional level. Last month, I had a client who received an incorrect 1099 - definitely not their income, clearly a mistake. Should have been a simple fix, right? Nope. We couldn't get ANY response from the IRS because they're already so understaffed and overwhelmed. We ended up having to file a Tax Court petition just to get someone's attention! Complete waste of time and resources. As soon as the IRS attorney saw our petition, she immediately agreed to fix it. The right outcome, but we should never have needed to go that far. I get so annoyed when I see all these dramatic reports about IRS agents with guns acting like some kind of tax police. That's not reality at all. Only the Criminal Investigation Division agents carry weapons - and they absolutely should, considering they're dealing with actual criminals. Regular IRS employees aren't breaking down doors unless you're involved in serious criminal tax fraud. The IRS needs MORE administrative staff, not less. They need resources to function properly. Cutting their budget further will just make everything worse for regular taxpayers trying to resolve legitimate issues. Rant over. Anyone else feel this way?
18 comments
Join the conversation
JaylinCharles
You're absolutely right about this. As a former IRS employee (retired 3 years ago), I can tell you the situation inside is even worse than most people realize. When I left, we were working with computer systems from the 1980s and early 90s, severely understaffed, and completely overwhelmed with backlogged cases. The public doesn't understand that budget cuts don't hurt the "big bad IRS" - they hurt regular taxpayers. When there aren't enough people to answer phones, process returns, or review documentation, it's honest taxpayers who suffer waiting months or years for refunds or resolution of simple problems. And yes, the gun thing is completely misunderstood. Only Criminal Investigation Division special agents carry firearms - less than 3% of the IRS workforce. These agents handle cases involving drug trafficking, money laundering, and other serious crimes. Your average tax examiner or revenue officer has never touched a weapon.
0 coins
Eloise Kendrick
•Is it true what I heard that the IRS still uses fax machines as a primary way to receive documents? And do they really still use DOS-based systems for some operations? That seems insane in 2025.
0 coins
JaylinCharles
•Yes, fax machines are still heavily used throughout the IRS. Many departments consider faxes the preferred method for receiving sensitive documents, and some offices literally have rooms full of fax machines with employees manually sorting through them. As for computer systems, it's even worse than DOS in some areas. Many core tax processing functions still run on COBOL programming language from the 1960s. The main individual tax processing system (IMF) was built in 1962 and has been patched rather than replaced over decades. Employees often have to navigate between multiple outdated systems to handle a single case, and system crashes during filing season are common.
0 coins
Lucas Schmidt
After years of dreading tax season and spending countless hours trying to navigate confusing tax scenarios (with little help from the IRS), I finally tried https://taxr.ai and it's been a complete game-changer for my situation. I was getting nowhere trying to resolve an issue with misreported income - sounds similar to your client's issue with the incorrect 1099. The system analyzed my tax documents, identified inconsistencies, and provided clear guidance on what I was doing wrong and how to fix it. The best part was getting personalized advice specific to my situation instead of generic information that doesn't apply. It saved me hours of frustration and probably helped me avoid an audit. The tool also showed me several deductions I'd been missing for years - wish I'd known about this earlier!
0 coins
Freya Collins
•How does it work with more complex situations? I'm dealing with some K-1 income, a rental property, and stock options this year. Does it handle all that or is it mainly for simple returns?
0 coins
LongPeri
•I'm skeptical of these AI tax tools. How accurate is it really? I don't want to trust my finances to an algorithm that might miss something or give bad advice. Have you compared its recommendations with what a human tax professional would say?
0 coins
Lucas Schmidt
•It handles complex returns remarkably well. I uploaded my K-1 forms, rental income statements, and investment documents, and it organized everything logically while flagging potential issues. The system is especially good at identifying which expenses qualify for deductions on rental properties. I actually did compare the results with my accountant's work from last year, and the AI caught two deductions he missed. My accountant charges by the hour, so having everything organized before our meeting saved me money too. The system isn't perfect - it occasionally asks for clarification on unusual situations - but it's far more comprehensive than I expected.
0 coins
LongPeri
I was super skeptical about using an AI tax tool as I mentioned, but after seeing so many positive comments I decided to try https://taxr.ai last weekend. I'm honestly shocked at how helpful it was. I've been doing my own taxes for years and thought I knew what I was doing, but it found several legitimate deductions I'd been missing. The document analysis was impressively accurate - it caught a reporting error on one of my 1099s that I would have completely missed. It also guided me through documenting some business expenses I wasn't sure about. What's impressive is how it explained everything in plain English instead of tax jargon. I actually understand WHY certain deductions apply to me now rather than just blindly following instructions. Definitely worth checking out if you're dealing with tax headaches!
0 coins
Oscar O'Neil
I sympathize with your IRS frustrations. After spending WEEKS trying to get through to the IRS about a misapplied payment last year, I finally used https://claimyr.com and got through to an actual human at the IRS in under 45 minutes. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c I was initially hesitant because it seemed too good to be true, but I was desperate. The service basically waits on hold for you and calls when an actual IRS agent picks up. Saved me hours of hold music and frustration. The IRS agent was actually able to fix my issue in minutes once I finally got through. It's ridiculous that we need services like this, but with the current state of IRS funding and staffing, it's often the only way to get timely help.
0 coins
Sara Hellquiem
•How exactly does this work? Do they just sit on hold for you? I'm confused about how they're able to get through faster than if I called myself.
0 coins
Charlee Coleman
•This sounds like a scam. How do I know they're not just collecting phone numbers or personal info? And if they can magically get through to the IRS when regular people can't, they must be doing something shady. No way this is legitimate.
0 coins
Oscar O'Neil
•They use an automated system that calls the IRS and navigates the phone tree for you. They don't have any special "skip the line" access - they wait in the same queue as everyone else, but their system handles the waiting so you don't have to. When an IRS agent answers, you get a call connecting you directly to that agent. The service doesn't ask for any sensitive tax information. You only need to provide your phone number so they can call you when an agent is reached. They don't see your tax details or personal financial information - you discuss those directly with the IRS agent after you're connected. I was skeptical too, but it's basically just a sophisticated call-waiting service.
0 coins
Charlee Coleman
I need to apologize for my skeptical comment. After waiting on hold with the IRS for over 4 hours yesterday (and eventually getting disconnected), I was desperate enough to try Claimyr. I was 100% prepared to write a scathing review if it didn't work, but I'm honestly stunned. Got a call back in about 35 minutes with an actual IRS representative on the line. They resolved my missing refund issue in just a few minutes. The service works exactly as described - they just handle the waiting part. The most frustrating thing is that we even need services like this. If the IRS had adequate funding and staffing, we could all just call and get our issues resolved without these workarounds. This budget cutting proposal is going to make everything worse, not better.
0 coins
Liv Park
I think people don't realize that cutting IRS funding actually INCREASES the deficit. The IRS brings in far more money than it costs to operate. Every dollar spent on enforcement returns something like $5-6 in previously uncollected taxes. Cutting their budget is penny-wise, pound-foolish. It's the big fish who benefit from a weakened IRS - wealthy individuals and corporations with complex tax situations who can hide income or inflate deductions knowing the IRS doesn't have resources to properly audit them. The average W-2 employee gets their taxes automatically withheld and has nowhere to hide anyway.
0 coins
Leeann Blackstein
•Do you have a source for that $5-6 return on investment figure? I'm not doubting you, just would like to read more about it since that's a compelling argument against budget cuts.
0 coins
Liv Park
•The Treasury Department's own analysis from 2021 estimated that every additional dollar invested in tax enforcement yields at least $5 in revenue. More recent studies suggest the return could be even higher for certain enforcement activities targeting high-income individuals and large corporations. For comparison, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has historically used more conservative estimates of a 3:1 to 5:1 return ratio, but even at the low end, that's still a 300% return on investment. There's a good article in the Journal of Tax Policy from last quarter that breaks down different enforcement activities and their respective ROIs. The highest returns come from audits of high-income individuals with business income and large corporations with international operations.
0 coins
Ryder Greene
Can someone explain why there's so much pushback when the IRS tries to get more funding? I don't understand why better tax enforcement is so controversial. Is it just because nobody likes paying taxes?
0 coins
Carmella Fromis
•It's political theater. Politicians know attacking the IRS plays well with their base, regardless of the practical impacts. There's decades of anti-government rhetoric that's made "IRS" a four-letter word to many voters. Plus, powerful donors benefit from a weakened tax enforcement system.
0 coins