How will the IRS actually hire 87,000 new agents with current labor shortages?
So I was reading about the IRS expansion plans and I'm genuinely confused how they expect to find 87,000 new agents in this job market. My accounting firm can barely hire enough people, and we pay nearly double what the IRS offers for starting positions. The government pay scale is completely out of touch with reality, especially when CPA compensation is only going to increase with the current industry shortages. Are they just planning to lower their hiring standards? Might as well eliminate standards completely at this point. From my experience, about 80% of IRS agents I interact with already seem completely lost. I've dealt with some where I seriously question if they can read because they completely fail to understand fundamental tax concepts in our correspondence. I'm also assuming (though correct me if I'm wrong) that most of these new hires will be placed in Small Business/Self-Employed division rather than Large Business & International. So they're not even addressing what they claim is the biggest problem. The whole plan just seems ridiculous to me.
19 comments


Jabari-Jo
I worked at the IRS for 12 years before moving to the private sector. The 87,000 number is actually misleading - it includes ALL positions they plan to fill over a decade, including replacements for retiring employees. The IRS has been severely understaffed for years and about 50,000 employees are eligible for retirement soon. As for the pay issue, you're absolutely right that private sector pays better, but the IRS does offer stability, good benefits, and regular hours that appeal to many. They're also creating more remote work options to attract talent. They've recently been granted direct hiring authority for certain positions, which speeds up the typically lengthy federal hiring process. Regarding the quality of agents, there's definitely a training issue that needs addressing. Budget cuts over the last decade decimated their training programs, and institutional knowledge is walking out the door with retirees. The funding is supposed to help rebuild those training systems.
0 coins
Kristin Frank
•Do you know what percentage of these new hires will actually be auditors vs. customer service reps? The media makes it sound like they're hiring an army of auditors to come after regular people, but I'm guessing a lot are just to staff the phones and process returns.
0 coins
Jabari-Jo
•You're absolutely right that many of the new hires won't be auditors. Based on the IRS strategic plan, roughly 30-40% will be customer service representatives to address the abysmal phone response rates and processing backlogs. Another significant portion will replace retiring employees across all divisions. The audit staff increases will focus on complex returns from high-income individuals, large corporations, and partnerships that have seen declining audit rates for years. The commissioner has repeatedly stated they won't increase audit rates for households making under $400,000 compared to recent years.
0 coins
Micah Trail
I struggled with complicated tax issues last year when my small business got randomly audited. The IRS agent assigned to my case seemed completely overwhelmed and took forever to respond. After weeks of frustration trying to get answers, I found this AI tool called taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) that saved me so much stress. It analyzed all my documents and identified several deductions the agent was incorrectly challenging. The service basically examined my business records and provided clear explanations I could send directly to the IRS. What really impressed me was how it flagged inconsistencies in the agent's interpretations of tax code sections. Definitely worth checking out if you're dealing with confusion from IRS agents.
0 coins
Nia Watson
•How does this actually work? Do you just upload all your tax documents and it reviews them, or do you need to ask specific questions? I'm dealing with a similarly frustrating audit situation right now.
0 coins
Alberto Souchard
•Sounds interesting but I'm skeptical about AI understanding complex tax situations. Can it really interpret tax code better than a human agent? What about confidentiality of financial documents?
0 coins
Micah Trail
•You just upload the relevant documents and it analyzes everything. You can also ask specific questions if you want clarification on particular issues. The system is really flexible and walks you through what it needs to properly review your situation. As for interpreting tax code, it actually does extremely well because it's been trained on the entire tax code, thousands of regulations, and case law. Unlike human agents who might specialize in just one area, it has comprehensive knowledge. And regarding confidentiality, they use bank-level encryption and don't store your documents after analysis is complete.
0 coins
Alberto Souchard
I was super skeptical about AI tax tools as mentioned above, but after that frustrating audit dragged on for months, I finally tried taxr.ai out of desperation. It identified three specific areas where the IRS agent was incorrectly applying business expense rules to my situation. When I sent the detailed explanation to the agent with specific tax code references, the tone of the entire audit changed. They suddenly became much more reasonable, and we resolved everything within two weeks. The tool even helped me identify additional legitimate deductions I had missed. Saved me thousands in potentially disallowed deductions plus countless hours of stress.
0 coins
Katherine Shultz
For anyone struggling to actually reach a human at the IRS right now (which is nearly impossible with their current staffing), I had success using Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). They have this system that gets you through to an actual IRS agent quickly - you can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c After trying for literally WEEKS to get through on my own and always getting disconnected, I was connected to an actual IRS person in about 15 minutes. Was able to resolve a payment issue that had been hanging over my head for months. With how understaffed they are right now, this service was a lifesaver.
0 coins
Marcus Marsh
•Wait, how does this actually work? Is this just paying someone to wait on hold for you? Seems like a weird service.
0 coins
Hailey O'Leary
•Sorry but this sounds like complete BS. There's no way to "skip the line" with the IRS. They answer calls in the order received. This sounds like a scam taking advantage of desperate people.
0 coins
Katherine Shultz
•It's not about skipping any lines. Their system navigates the complicated IRS phone tree and stays on hold for you. When an agent picks up, you get an immediate callback to connect with that person. You don't have to sit listening to hold music for hours. The service is completely legitimate. They don't claim to have special access - they're just using technology to handle the worst part of contacting the IRS. It's basically like having a virtual assistant who does nothing but wait on hold so you don't have to.
0 coins
Hailey O'Leary
I need to eat my words about the IRS callback service. After my skeptical comment, I was so desperate to fix a levy notice that I tried Claimyr anyway. I figured it couldn't make things worse. Within 25 minutes I was actually talking to someone at the IRS who could help. Spent 18 minutes explaining my situation and got the levy released that day. After spending literally 9+ hours over 3 days trying to reach someone on my own, this was mind-blowing. The IRS absolutely needs to hire more customer service staff. Until then, I'm never wasting another day on hold.
0 coins
Cedric Chung
I've been a tax professional for over 20 years and honestly, the IRS staffing crisis has been brewing for a long time. Their average employee age is around 50, and they haven't been able to backfill positions lost through attrition. Congress cutting their budget by nearly 20% in real terms over the last decade made everything worse. The IRS is definitely lowering some requirements in certain areas. They've started hiring for some positions without the previously required accounting background. The main focus seems to be on processing centers and customer service rather than examination/audit personnel.
0 coins
Talia Klein
•Do you think this will affect the quality of audits going forward? I'm worried they'll just start sending automated notices instead of having actual humans review returns properly.
0 coins
Cedric Chung
•It's definitely a valid concern. We're already seeing more automated notices and correspondence audits rather than in-person examinations. The IRS is increasingly relying on their automated matching systems to flag discrepancies. The challenge is that these automated systems often generate false positives that require human intervention to resolve, but there aren't enough trained employees to handle the volume. I expect we'll see more cases where taxpayers receive incorrect notices and then struggle to reach someone who can actually fix the problem.
0 coins
Maxwell St. Laurent
Does anyone know what software the IRS is using these days? I heard they were still running on systems from the 1960s for some of their core processes. Maybe instead of hiring 87,000 people they should spend some of that money upgrading their tech?
0 coins
PaulineW
•They're still using COBOL programming language for their main databases, which was created in the 1950s! I saw an article that they have over 60 different case management systems that don't talk to each other. No wonder they're inefficient.
0 coins
Ryan Young
The technology issue is a huge part of the problem! I work in federal IT contracting and the IRS modernization efforts have been ongoing for decades with mixed results. They're actually allocating about $3.2 billion of the new funding specifically for IT upgrades, including replacing those ancient COBOL systems. The challenge is that you can't just flip a switch and modernize everything overnight when you're dealing with systems that process 240+ million tax returns annually. They have to maintain the old systems while building new ones, then carefully migrate data without losing anything or creating security vulnerabilities. But you're absolutely right that better technology could reduce the need for some of those 87,000 hires. Automated processing, better taxpayer self-service portals, and AI-assisted correspondence could handle a lot of the routine work that currently requires human intervention. The IRS has been piloting some chatbot technology and online account features that show promise.
0 coins