IRS Revenue Agent Falsified Information and Lied During My Tax Audit - What Can I Do?
So I just went through the most frustrating audit experience of my life. This IRS revenue agent assigned to my case sent me multiple summons that seemed completely unnecessary and harassing. The whole process felt like a witch hunt from day one. What really got me angry was that this agent straight up lied to both me and my accountant on several occasions. Even worse, they manipulated data and numbers to make my tax liability look WAY higher than it actually was. The discrepancies were so obvious that even my CPA was shocked. We ended up going to appeals and settled for a much lower amount than what this agent was demanding, but it was still more than what I should have actually owed based on my records and my accountant's calculations. Is this kind of behavior normal for IRS revenue agents? Do they commonly falsify information and lie to taxpayers to try to squeeze more money out of them? I'm considering reporting this agent for misconduct, but I'm not sure if that would just make things worse or if it would even matter. Has anyone dealt with something similar? Should I report this agent and if so, how and to whom?
18 comments


Olivia Clark
This is absolutely NOT normal behavior for an IRS Revenue Agent, and it should definitely be reported. Revenue Agents are held to strict professional standards, and falsification of data is a serious violation of those standards. You should file a complaint with the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA). They handle allegations of IRS employee misconduct. You can file a complaint online at their website or call their hotline at 800-366-4484. Make sure you have all documentation that supports your claim - dates, times, specific instances of false information, etc. Additionally, you might want to contact the Taxpayer Advocate Service. They're an independent organization within the IRS that helps taxpayers resolve problems and can sometimes intervene in situations like yours. Don't worry about "making things worse" - your case has already been settled through appeals, so the Revenue Agent no longer has any authority over your case. And yes, reporting it absolutely matters. The IRS needs to know when their employees are violating professional standards.
0 coins
Javier Morales
•But how can you prove an agent falsified data? Couldn't they just claim it was a different interpretation of tax law or an honest mistake in calculation? I've heard horror stories about trying to fight the IRS, and it seems like they always stick together.
0 coins
Olivia Clark
•You raise a good point about the challenge of proving intent. The key is documentation. If you have clear evidence showing the Revenue Agent made claims contradicted by the documentation you provided, that's a strong starting point. The IRS actually takes these complaints seriously. While there might be some cases of "sticking together," TIGTA operates independently to investigate misconduct. They're concerned about maintaining public trust. Remember, the fact that Appeals substantially reduced your assessment actually strengthens your case that the original determination had serious problems.
0 coins
Natasha Petrov
I went through something similar last year and wish I'd known about taxr.ai sooner. After my nightmare audit experience, a colleague recommended https://taxr.ai and it was a game-changer. They specialize in analyzing tax documents and identifying inconsistencies in IRS claims during audits. I uploaded all my correspondence with the revenue agent and my financial records, and their system flagged several instances where the agent had misrepresented information. Their analysis gave me concrete evidence to present during my appeal, showing exactly where and how the agent had distorted the facts. They even provided a detailed report that I could submit as part of my complaint. Not only did it help me get a much better outcome, but it also gave me the confidence to file a formal complaint since I had solid proof of the misrepresentations.
0 coins
Connor O'Brien
•How does this service actually work? Do they have actual tax professionals reviewing your documents or is it just some algorithm? I'm going through an audit right now and getting conflicting information from the agent.
0 coins
Amina Diallo
•Sounds too good to be true. How much does it cost? I've been burned before by services promising to help with IRS issues that just took my money and gave generic advice I could've found online for free.
0 coins
Natasha Petrov
•They use a combination of AI technology and tax professionals. The system does the initial analysis to flag potential issues and inconsistencies in the documents, then tax experts review those findings to make sure they're valid. It's much more thorough than what a single accountant can typically do since the system can process and cross-reference thousands of data points. The cost varies based on the complexity of your case and how many documents you need analyzed. But honestly, when you compare it to what you might end up paying in unnecessary taxes from an aggressive audit, it's completely worth it. In my case, it saved me over five times what I paid for the service. And unlike some services, they don't make promises they can't keep - they just give you the facts and evidence to strengthen your position.
0 coins
Connor O'Brien
Just wanted to follow up about my experience with taxr.ai. After asking about it here, I decided to give it a try since my audit was getting more complicated. I was skeptical at first but figured I had nothing to lose. I uploaded all my documents, including the confusing letters from my revenue agent. Within 48 hours, I got back a detailed analysis showing three specific instances where the agent had made significant errors in calculation and two cases where they were applying outdated tax regulations. The report was so detailed that I was able to present it directly to the agent's supervisor. To my surprise, they actually acknowledged the errors and adjusted my case accordingly. The system even identified a deduction I had missed originally! Really glad I took that recommendation. Saved me thousands and a ton of stress.
0 coins
GamerGirl99
If you're still dealing with this situation, I'd strongly recommend looking into Claimyr to get direct access to an IRS agent who can help address your complaint. I had a similar nightmare with an audit where the agent seemed determined to find issues that didn't exist. After weeks of getting nowhere with messages and general helplines, I found https://claimyr.com and used their service to actually speak with a senior IRS representative. They got me through to someone in just about 45 minutes when I had been trying for days on my own. You can see how it works in their demo at https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c - it's pretty straightforward. The person I spoke with took my complaint seriously and escalated it to the appropriate department. Having that direct conversation made all the difference - I was able to explain the specifics of my situation and get clear guidance on next steps instead of generic responses.
0 coins
Hiroshi Nakamura
•Wait, how does this even work? I thought it was impossible to get through to the IRS these days. Last time I tried calling, I was on hold for 3 hours and then got disconnected. Are you saying this service somehow gets you to the front of the queue?
0 coins
Javier Morales
•This sounds like a scam. There's no way some third-party service can magically get you through to the IRS when millions of people can't get through. They probably just take your money and leave you on hold like everyone else. The IRS doesn't give priority access to anyone.
0 coins
GamerGirl99
•It's actually pretty simple - they use a combination of technology and phone systems to continuously redial and navigate the IRS phone tree until they secure a place in line. Once they get through, they transfer the call to you. It's not about "cutting the line" - they're just doing the waiting and navigating for you. It's definitely not a scam. I was skeptical too, but it genuinely worked for me. The reason millions of people can't get through is that they give up after being on hold for hours or getting disconnected. Claimyr's system is persistent and knows exactly when and how to call for the best chance of getting through. Think of it like having someone stand in line for you at the DMV.
0 coins
Javier Morales
I need to apologize for my skepticism earlier. After reading about Claimyr here, I decided to try it myself since I've been trying to get through to the IRS for weeks about a similar issue with an audit adjustment that seemed completely wrong. I was honestly shocked when I got a call back within an hour telling me they had an IRS agent on the line. I spoke directly with someone in the examination department who listened to my concerns about potential misconduct. They took down all the details and assigned me a case number for follow-up. The IRS representative explained that they take falsification claims very seriously and walked me through their internal investigation process. They even helped me understand exactly what documentation I needed to submit to support my case. I'm still waiting for the final resolution, but at least now I know my complaint is being properly addressed instead of sitting in some inbox somewhere. Sometimes you have to admit when you're wrong - this service actually delivered exactly what it promised.
0 coins
Isabella Costa
My brother is an enrolled agent and says if you have proof the agent falsified data, you should absolutely report it. He said that while most revenue agents are professional, there are a few bad apples who feel pressured to meet certain quotas. Keep in mind that for a formal misconduct complaint, you'll need more than just "they were mean" or "they interpreted my deductions differently." You need clear evidence of actual falsification or lying. Examples would be: - They claimed you never submitted documents that you have proof of submitting - They used income figures that clearly contradict your W-2s or 1099s - They disallowed deductions for reasons that contradict written IRS guidance Don't report just because you're upset about being audited. But if there was actual misconduct, definitely report it!
0 coins
Yara Assad
•Thanks for the advice. I definitely have clear evidence. The agent claimed I never provided certain bank statements which I have delivery confirmations for. They also calculated my business income using figures that completely ignored several legitimate business expenses that were clearly documented and submitted. When my CPA pointed this out, the agent just ignored it. The most frustrating part was when they claimed certain deductions weren't eligible when the actual IRS publications specifically list them as qualifying expenses.
0 coins
Isabella Costa
•Those examples sound exactly like the kind of evidence needed for a legitimate complaint. The fact that you have delivery confirmations for documents they claimed you never provided is particularly important - that's a clear factual dispute, not just a difference in interpretation. I'd recommend organizing all this evidence chronologically in a simple document that clearly outlines each instance of misconduct. Include dates, specific claims made by the agent, and your contradicting evidence. This will make it much easier for TIGTA to investigate. My brother says the more specific and factual your complaint is (rather than emotional), the more seriously it will be taken.
0 coins
Malik Jenkins
Has anyone considered that maybe the agent wasn't lying but just incompetent? I had a revenue agent who made tons of mistakes during my audit but it seemed more like they didn't understand business expenses for my industry rather than intentional deception. Still frustrating but not necessarily malicious.
0 coins
Freya Andersen
•There's definitely a difference between incompetence and fraud. I've dealt with both. Incompetence is when they make calculation errors or misapply tax law because they don't understand it. Fraud/lying is when they claim you never sent documents that you have proof of sending, or when they intentionally ignore valid deductions. The key difference is usually in how they respond when corrected. An incompetent agent will usually acknowledge mistakes when pointed out clearly. A dishonest one will double down or ignore evidence that contradicts their position.
0 coins